What really pisses me off about this is the fact that people are bad mouthing the graphics and whatnot.
Take it from me it is a BAD idea to judge a game on graphics alone. About 6 years ago when I was 11 I saw Monkey Island 1 & 2 at a store and I didnt buy it. Why? Because the graphics "were'nt as good as Monkey Island 3"(I had the demo). A few months later I bought Flight of the Amazon Queen (An adventure game inspired by MI) and soon found out that Monkey Island was the main insiration behind it and I also realised my mistake. Since then I was on the look for Monkey Island. The second time I saw it was in the LucasArts Archives Volume 3 alonside The Dig and Full Throttle. I should have bought it but I had no money so that was another oppurtunity slipped away. The third time however I was lucky. The Monkey Island Bounty Pack. I had the money, I bought it and it was fun. It really ****s me when someone judges a game on graphics. I dont know what the problem is. The graphics are excellent by my count. And it looks like it will play well.
So remember what I said about judging by graphics. DONT. I did and I regretted it.
You also need to consider that, although it isnt an extreme hardcore adventure title, niether was Quest for Glory. It was an adventure game with RPG elements (You had a health bar, you had to fight and other stuff, whilst still retaining the puzzle solving and inventory like in all adventure games). So just because FT2 isnt full of the stuff old gamers desire doesnt mean its gonna suck.
Oh and for the record, The Dig didnt suck ass.