Jump to content



  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kipperthefrog

  1. remember this thread?




    Thanks to you and others like you on lucasforums, I have seen the light!


    I was raised by a catholic family that did not know better. now I have seen a different view point. I have since came to read and watch people like Richard Dawkins and I have been enlightened.


    If you ever read this, Thank you for helping me find the way to the world of critical thinking!



  2. I made this thread. I think it is important enough to move it to a more heavily populated discussion forum, but I don't know if I am allowed to repost the same thread elsewhere in these forums.




    can you move this to another forum or link to this thread from a more populated forum?


    Thank you.

  3. Sign the petitions and spread the word! We can fight this. Look what we have done with SOPA and PIPA!
  4. They are trying to pass an anti privacy bill! they want to make "big Brother" a reality! please sign the petition and spread the word! Whatch this video and see this site! http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/183656/privacy-is-awesome-campaign-hopes-to-derail-cybersecurity-bill-cispa/ http://www.privacyisawesome.com/
  5. well if you ever see this, you made great posts!

  6. I read in Sam Harris: Letter to a christian nation that one guy will oppose the vaccine because it will encourage pre-marital sex by making it less risky.
  7. goodbye skinwalker. you have really opened my eyes.

  8. I haven't seen you post since 2009. where have you been?

  9. one guy posted: http://gamepolitics.com/2010/07/12/california-submitting-arguments-schwarzenegger-v-ema-today
  10. how is everything in Australia? are most people unhappy with the censorship?

  11. @ Lynk Former I was thinking about how "custom officers" can snoop through laptops at airports and all the censorship goin on. does it worry you any? you think it is likely that they will create more censorship? outlay all nudity eventually? anything like that?
  12. no, i just say that consenting adults know what they are doing regardless of bodyshape. there is no evidence that it does harm, and there is no absolute definition of "too small". your argument above is fallacious in 2 ways: 1st its an ad homineim: attack the person rather than the argument. 2nd, it s a red herring. you can't compete with the argument at hand and can't provide evidence that it encourages pedophilia, so you create a distraction argument. they will ban other things. all they need is an excuse. it doesnt have to be the same excuse. they can use whatever excuse they find.
  13. where will they draw the line between a and b size? when people get in trouble, they woill probably use it as an excuse to ban nude women all together. ever hear of the bandwagon effect? also, i still have yet to see proof that A size chests will encourage pedophilia.
  14. even if it don t lead down a slippery slope, what is the Empirical data that drew them to the conclusion that small breast porno will encourage pedophilia like they claim. it's just an excuse.
  15. they'll have their excuses to ban more things, wait and see.
  16. yea, but where will they draw the line? they will use the chilling effect I sited above.
  17. I noticed that their clasification board made vague comments about what constitutes "too small". seems like they are using the "chilling effect" to make people afraid to get porno since cops can say anything is "too small". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilling_effect_%28term%29
  18. thank you Avery. it appears that most people are in denial. I don't live in Australia, but who knows how many other countries will follow suit? If they can filter the internet, they can filter anything that disagrees with the government. Once we loose our freedom, it is hard to get it back.
  19. so who is to say what breast size is too small? if a guy gets caught with an old lover' guide movie and an Agent says "her breasts looks too small" , then what? a court decides if the questioned movie is acceptable or not? face it. there are no absolute breast sizes. its a gradient. there is size A for example, Size B and any size in between. before you know it they will arrest people for depictions of B size breasts although it not officially illegal, but they will be deemed too small. everyone else will have to stay away from small breasts porn for fear cops can justify calling it obscene. the bar will get raised up to size b to size C untill no women pics at all.
  20. can you clarify this? what do you mean "Maybe it won't work, but it's not a bad idea to cut into fueling pedophilia?"
  21. it is a slippery slope. one they get a foot hold in small breasts, they can say slightly bigger sizes are un acceptable.
  22. whats that got to do with anything? if anything human laziness will allow them to ban more stuff with little resistance.
  23. vid 1 vid 2 "EA’s measure would tie online game-play to codes that come with select new titles, meaning that purchasers of used games, which feature Online Pass, would need to shell out $10.00 for a new code in order to play online." ~gamepolitics.com This will hurt the used game industry and your ability to buy and trade used games with cost effectiveness. you wont get as much for your used games you turn in, and those who buy the game used won't be able to play online features unless you fork over an extra 10 bucks. Online passes will only benefit EA. This is their attempt to line their pockets and discourage the trade of used games. They act like they will "enhance online services" but you will actually get the same services you would get regardless. They just want to make you pay an extra 10 bucks to get features that already come with games. EA can't stand stores making money off used games. watch vids for more details. He explains it better. Please spread the word to every forum, blog and site you know. If EA's experiment works, This will become the standard of all games. boycott games that feature online passes.
  • Create New...