Jump to content

Home

insert witty revolution-esque title here.


VanLingo

Are the mods doing their job?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Are the mods doing their job?

    • No! They lock and delete all the wrong threads!
      1
    • Yes! They work very hard to please everyone.
      0
    • No comment.
      0
    • Mods? We have mods?
      0


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 196
  • Created
  • Last Reply

yes, I will. and I dont want an army to fight the mods, I just want the admin or something to do something about mods who are hypcrites. I've been said I was banned for my Japan thing, flaming, harrassing, which is it? All of those said by different people. Please, do, tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a thread for questions about the forums that arent worth a whole thread. here's two.

 

1. Whats the worst a sig can be before you get banned?

 

2. What do you do if you ban someone with 300 posts in a temp-ban. Do u make thier sig say- Banned? since they dont have enough posts for a title?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was nver warned for the Japan thing, it was closed rather quickly once I started rambling, and please tell my specific instances where I flamed and another when I harrassed. The hyprocrites are...Lynk and Jed. Maybe more, but I cant tihnk of them off the top of my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.) There is no set limit on how bad we allow, if it's highly offensive then we will first ask that it be changed without banning, unless it is explicit porn...then it's a direct out ban.

 

 

2.) The custom title always reads banned when people get banned. Even if they only have 1 post. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You call us hypcrites yet you are one yourself. And not that I say that out of the blue. I refer to the "rules should apply to mods aswell" thread where you called me a jerk without even knowing me. Lukely for you I´m not that vindicatory.

 

First of all I advice you to have a look at SkinWalker´s post a bit up and read it over a few times. He explained very will that discussion about people´s believe can pull em slightly over the edge when they are not supposed to. It isn´t always ment and people shouldn´t take everything that serious what happens around here. This is not a point to say you or the other´s behaviour was good/bad but just something people should keep in mind.

 

As for the reason you were banned. In some cases your bevahiour was completely uncalled for. You tried to put TK on his place when all he was doing was his job. A thing you shouldn´t be doing. Secondly you followed Lynk to "his" section and harassed him over there what was completely unacceptable.

 

I don´t have any problems with you as you make really good posts towards the Battlefront community. But its just your behaviour that has to tuned a bit. Chill, don´t take everything so personal, try to be friends with people and you´ll do just fine. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For starters, I never harrassed Lynk, if you call what I posted to him harrassment, then I saw when you posted, 'Noob, Kill Yourself' harrassment ,and would say you should be banned. and I never said you were a jerk. I said if I got to know you, you probably would be one, simply because of the people you hang out with. (I may have called u a jerk, if I did, please quote it and post it here.)

 

and I was never wanred about the spy on japan for me thing. If I was warned by way of pm, I would have glsdly edited it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by yaebginn

and when/if they get unbanned, do they now have a cutsom title despite their lack of posts?

 

and I find insanesiths sig offensive.

 

oh, and I wanted my title to be 'Rubber Banned' but it makes ****** when I try to type banned, whats the deal?

When they get unbanned their title will exactly be the same as it was before the ban.

 

Noted.

 

Banned is a forbidden word as custom title. I think there are more but I have no idea what they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by yaebginn

I was nver warned for the Japan thing, it was closed rather quickly once I started rambling, and please tell my specific instances where I flamed and another when I harrassed. The hyprocrites are...Lynk and Jed. Maybe more, but I cant tihnk of them off the top of my head.

when you followed lynk over the rsn, you were there for no other reason than to harrass him. Your constant anti-japanese comments and paranoid delusions are harrassment especially on a forum with high international users and are rather trollish, namely that stint on the old lady ninja in disguise. And your argument in the jar-jar thread just proves how obsessed you are with opposing people and provoking arguments that should not even take place.

 

 

posted by you yaeb

I am against ET because he acts like a jerk.

 

http://www.lucasforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=133546

 

 

posted by you yaeb

Pad, I dnt know you, if I got to know you, I probably wouldnt like you either, but you never know

that's not very nice

 

 

 

I'll gather some more if you want. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by yaebginn

For starters, I never harrassed Lynk, if you call what I posted to him harrassment, then I saw when you posted, 'Noob, Kill Yourself' harrassment ,and would say you should be banned. and I never said you were a jerk. I said if I got to know you, you probably would be one, simply because of the people you hang out with. (I may have called u a jerk, if I did, please quote it and post it here.)

 

and I was never wanred about the spy on japan for me thing. If I was warned by way of pm, I would have glsdly edited it out.

 

First, that pic was to get you to just shut up because you were acting like an idiot. Apparently, you're the only one who took in in offence. However, a lot of people found many of your posts offensive.

 

And, I doubt you would have edited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by yaebginn

I was never wanred about the spy on japan for me thing. If I was warned by way of pm, I would have glsdly edited it out.

yes you were, lynk posted a warning directly in the thread.

Originally posted by Lynk Former

yaebginn, you start screwing around with me here and I'll ban you. Understood?

 

sounds like a warning to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by InsaneSith

what exactly is offensive about it?

After reviewing it I agree. You say it´s offensive to you which makes me think about your age. People "can" join LF when they are 13 and last time I checked that´s right in puberty where such thoughts are generated every split second.

 

Also note that such text can be found on various websites that are publicly viewable. Are you going on crusade to make them take it away. I think not. Personally I think you said that just to provoke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I made my sig, 'Mods R Gay,' you'd be offended and make me chnage it, I'll continue once you confirm or deny this statement. oh, and it doesnt matter about age, I am offended to see someone say that sex was in anyway meant for babies to have it. (and if its not meant that way, then I can say that my idea says that mods are happy)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by yaebginn

I am offended to see someone say that sex was in anyway meant for babies to have it.

 

.....what? :eyeraise:

 

Mods R Gay would be insulting someone. Saying sex is not JUST for babies isn't insulting anyone, it's telling the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by yaebginn

I am offended to see someone say that sex was in anyway meant for babies to have it. (and if its not meant that way, then I can say that my idea says that mods are happy)

.... you are very thick headed, the point was that sex isn't just meant to procreate anymore, but more about pleasure and enjoyment.

 

Originally posted by ZBomber

Mods R Gay would be insulting someone.

only if used in a negative fashion, which going by previous posts from yaebginn one can only assume he means it negatively.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I was going to say that saying mods r gay is a direct attack on mods....Siths sig isn't attacking anyone, it's just stating a point....but two people have already said that before me...so....er.....yeah. And you wouldn't be meaning mods are happy and joyful if you said we're gay. That meaning of gay has become outdated and is no longer in use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by InsaneSith

.... you are very thick headed, the point was that sex isn't just meant to procreate anymore, but more about pleasure and enjoyment.

 

only if used in a negative fashion, which going by previous posts from yaebginn one can only assume he means it negatively.

 

You know what I meant.... :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...