rut-wa jodar Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 Does anyone else think that snowspeeder blasters should be more effective against AT-ST`s ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Global Strike Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 Well, AT-ST's should have only light armor, unless you mean the four-legged AT-AT walkers. :jawa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoQ Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 I think the armor on the AT-ST's are just fine. Any more and they would be too heavily armored. Any less and they wouldn't be a challenge. Nope I think they got it just right! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpt. Bannon Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 snowspeeders aren't heavy combat ships or cold weather units in the first place...the rebels barely had some working in the cold weather when the empire attacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JawaJoey Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 It just seems wierd because in practically every other game ever the snowspeeder is quite effective against AT-STs, as in one run and they're down. I was trying to do that in this game then I realized that I wasn't doing much damage at all. I think the armor is all right, the damage of the snowspeeder just need to be upped a bit. So far, the only use for it is tripping AT-ATs and strafng ground troops. It should be useful to fight AT-STs as well, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoQ Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 Originally posted by JawaJoey It just seems wierd because in practically every other game ever the snowspeeder is quite effective against AT-STs, as in one run and they're down. I am assuming that you are refering to games like "shadows of the empire", and the "rouge squadron" games? I always had a problem with the damage in those games. You could take down a AT-AT by just firing your blasters from your snowspeeder if you did it long enough. Eventhough in ESB, they specificly say "Our blasters have no effect". IMO, i feel they finally got the damage system down right when it comes to the AT-AT and AT-ST's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JawaJoey Posted October 2, 2004 Share Posted October 2, 2004 I agree about the AT-ATs, but the AT-STs are supposed to have much, much lighter armor. How could a scout walker that balances on two measley legs have armor so thick that a ship's blasters have almost no effect? THe snowspeeder shouldn't have as strong lasers as say and X Wing, but still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil Dark Jedi Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 I have taken down an AT-AT with snowspeeder blasters. I agree the AT-ST's have to much armour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neon Posted October 3, 2004 Share Posted October 3, 2004 bwa, if you look the the AAT when you shoot a AAT with a snowspeeder it's destroyed immediately Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.