coupes. Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 http://www.washingtondispatch.com/spectrum/archives/000637.html Also check this out : http://isbushwired.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZBomber Posted October 14, 2004 Share Posted October 14, 2004 Quite possibly. But you never know, people always enjoying pointing fingers.... And from what I understand, he was still kinda..... a bad debater, so I doubt he was getting any help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Dravis Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 There was a fun thread on NS about this. No one really knows, and I don't think anyone is likely to know. Everything's just speculation right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 I honestly wouldn't be surprised if it IS true, though one would have thought somebody would have told him to stop looking like such an arrogant jack*** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coupes. Posted October 15, 2004 Author Share Posted October 15, 2004 I just found this video, only the first 30 seconds or so are really important. http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/BushAndTheOddSync.wmv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Dravis Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Originally posted by .:CoupeS:. I just found this video, only the first 30 seconds or so are really important. http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/BushAndTheOddSync.wmv A video from a site 'Dedicated to Bush Out in 2004'. Objective source you have there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coupes. Posted October 15, 2004 Author Share Posted October 15, 2004 Originally posted by Samuel Dravis A video from a site 'Dedicated to Bush Out in 2004'. Objective source you have there. And your point is ? Besides, did you even look at the link of the video, does that look like a anti-Bush site to you ? Even if I had found this on a site 'Dedicated to Bush Out in 2004' I don't see how it would make a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Dravis Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Originally posted by .:CoupeS:. And your point is ? Besides, did you even look at the link of the video, does that look like a anti-Bush site to you ? Even if I had found this on a site 'Dedicated to Bush Out in 2004' I don't see how it would make a difference. It could be just some partisans having a bit of fun. I wonder how hard it is to edit a sound file...not very. Perhaps if it was off of a more reliable source (ie, one that would be strongly challenged by people if they just made something up) I would be more inclined to believe it. As it is, I doubt its veracity. I did watch the video, and I did look at the link (the directory right above the one in which the video file resides): Link. Edit: <----------- Aha! Look at that number, baby! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Groovy Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Jeezum Crow, even my hands free for my cell phone has a smaller wire than that. What a ding bat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTV2 Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 that is odd could be just is back, but that whent up his whole spine Bush, cheated last time to be president, and now hes cheating again:mad: ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Originally posted by Darth Groovy Jeezum Crow, even my hands free for my cell phone has a smaller wire than that. What a ding bat. But your hands free for you cell phone doesn't have government-level encryption/decryption routines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alegis Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 If it would be true, wonder why no one noticed it. If you can notice it from a not so detailed screenie, why couldnt the ppl there notice it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Dravis Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Does anyone actually have any sort of solid evidence to prove that it was in fact a wire? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coupes. Posted October 15, 2004 Author Share Posted October 15, 2004 Then how would you explain that big rectangular bulge with a wire-like bulge on top ? And who exactly is Bush asking to let him finnish in this clip, when he's clearly not being interrupted ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Dravis Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Originally posted by .:CoupeS:. Then how would you explain that big rectangular bulge with a wire-like bulge on top ? And who exactly is Bush asking to let him finnish in this clip, when he's clearly not being interrupted ? Speculation. You don't really know it's a wire, nor do you know who he's talking to or why he said it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckcsaber Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 I'm not convinced. A bulge in his jacket does not prove that he was wearing a wire. The clip is only audio, and does not show if someone was gesturing for him to stop or something similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapNColostomy Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 The big mystery is: Who cares if he WAS wearing a wire? According to most anti Bush people he's lost the debates due to being a nitwit and a poor public speaker who fumbles through the English language anyway. So BFD if he had a wire? It doesn't seemed to have helped him any. If you played professional baseball, and you took steroids, yet NEVER hit a home run, or caught a ball EVER!!! Why would anyone give a **** that you took steroids? That's my humble opinion on the subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagabond Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Okay, we clearly know that there is something under his jacket. Surely no one will deny that, right? So, if we all agree that something is under his jacket, then let's consider what it could be: 1. An audio transmitter / receiver / scrambler / descrambler. 2. A microphone (except he had one on the podium). 3. A rectangular-shaped mouse with a thick tail. 4. A remote control for the Bush Robotic Puppet™. 5. It was none of the above - he was just glad to see us. But seriously, let us assume he wasn't wired during the first debate, which is entirely believable since his did so poorly. Next, let us consider his marked improvement during the 2nd and 3rd debates, which coincidentally coincides with the discovery of the mystery deviced under his jacket. If a reasonable explanation cannot be provided as to the function of said mystery device, then the speculation about audio receivers appears to have some credibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coupes. Posted October 15, 2004 Author Share Posted October 15, 2004 I'll give you guys the benifit of the doubt about the audio clip, but it still seems very odd. However, my question still stands. What could that bulge possibly be if it's not a wire and receiver ? I don't see many possibilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZBomber Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Originally posted by MTV2 now hes cheating again:mad: ...... Please explain..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swphreak Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Originally posted by Alegis If it would be true, wonder why no one noticed it. If you can notice it from a not so detailed screenie, why couldnt the ppl there notice it? Well, his back is not turned to the audience. Originally posted by ZBomber Please explain..... He's probbaly referring to the Florida recount episode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZBomber Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Originally posted by StarWarsPhreak He's probbaly referring to the Florida recount episode. If he is, then that's pretty lame. Al Gore wanted a re-count, he got one, and STILL lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vagabond Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Originally posted by ZBomber If he is, then that's pretty lame. Al Gore wanted a re-count, he got one, and STILL lost. Uh...wrong. What actually happened is that the Supreme Court stopped the recount, and then later said, "Well, since there isn't enough time to complete a recount before inauguration day, the current results stand. So, no, he didn't get a recount Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jed Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 How about this? It's a Democrat conspiracy. And before you go crying wolf, I don't support Bush. Has anyone thought that he could...hmm, maybe be wearing something else under there? Maybe even...a bulletproof vest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alegis Posted October 15, 2004 Share Posted October 15, 2004 Still I ask again. Why wouldnt anyone ther e have noticed it and now on a, not so detailed pic, everyone go crazy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.