toms Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Good grief, there is enough ill thought out insanity, backfiring effects, first ammendment breaches, political shenanigans and sheer insanity to keep the Senate going for weeks! Next time there is an election and people start raking over voting records they should remember this incident, when such a far reaching and daft law was piggybacked on an unrelated bill on "Dept of Justice funding" and realise these sort of shenannigans means that you either have to support a good bill with bad riders, or oppose a good bill due to it's bad riders.. and either way you will get blamed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_hill987 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 George W is a F****ing A******, and ***** his own ****, my name is Tony and I live at Number 10 Downing Street, London, England. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toms Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Hey tony, you are a F****ing A******, and ***** his own **** - GW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reclaimer Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 The funny thing is, that Bush believes the FBI will watch ever single website for flaming. Lol Good Luck, Mr. Bush. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET Warrior Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 I think a few of you are thinking that Bush himself actually signed this law into legislation, and just this law. Bush might not have even KNOWN about it. It's one of those stupid political tricks, you slip your bill into another one that IS going to get passed, because it needs to be, so yours also gets passed. Not saying it's not bull****, just saying I doubt Bush gives a damn about this law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reclaimer Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 @ ET: I hadn't even thought about that. Maybe Bush really didn't know about it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellfire Jedi Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 *Enter name here*, you are a genuine arse monkey and no one likes you, eat **** and die.... Here's my card. i am annoyed, i demand your address, phone number, and real name. <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IG-64 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 I think a few of you are thinking that Bush himself actually signed this law into legislation, and just this law. Bush might not have even KNOWN about it. It's one of those stupid political tricks, you slip your bill into another one that IS going to get passed, because it needs to be, so yours also gets passed. Not saying it's not bull****, just saying I doubt Bush gives a damn about this law. ^ I was gonna post something like that but I didn't think anyone would listen to me. >_> Oh, and i'm surprised no one's said "internets" yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-8252 Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 I think a few of you are thinking that Bush himself actually signed this law into legislation, and just this law. Bush might not have even KNOWN about it. It's one of those stupid political tricks, you slip your bill into another one that IS going to get passed, because it needs to be, so yours also gets passed. Not saying it's not bull****, just saying I doubt Bush gives a damn about this law. Exactly. The article says: "Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing Cyberstalking."" Bush taking the time to actually READ the fineprint? Unlikely. Oh yeah, and I can't believe that people are trying to butcher Al Gore's internets like this! (There ya go IG ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toms Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Next time there is an election and people start raking over voting records they should remember this incident, when such a far reaching and daft law was piggybacked on an unrelated bill on "Dept of Justice funding" and realise these sort of shenanigans means that you either have to support a good bill with bad riders, or oppose a good bill due to it's bad riders.. and either way you will get blamed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.