Jump to content

Home

Why is jk2 better than jk3?


neal8929

Recommended Posts

Because JA added a bunch of flashy lightsaber moves and other acrobatic moves but also nerfed the other things like the movements and the guns. It was a lot more slower, rolling didn't do anything, no more strafe-jumping. Guns were useless now, the Tenloss was nerfed among other things, and saber fighting was dull.

 

Plus the storyline wasn't as good. Jaden isn't as interesting a character as Kyle. Kyle actually had a backstory and depth to him. What was Jaden's story? He built a saber and wasn't even a Jedi. OMG.

 

those were just some of the things that i didn't like about it. Other people might add more reasons, but those are all I could think of right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JO has a MUCH better storyline, and other elements work smoothly in JK2 (like rolling) whereas they do not in JA. The hit detection is questionable at best in JA. A lot of people who left JO to play JA came back and some others (like me :D) kept JO then got JA and now play both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Jo is better than Ja. We should all know that the game was rushed which is why the game was so poor(story). I gotta admit they did make some great new addons ok only 1 in my veiw(Multiple sabers) Weapons are like useless in ja compared to Jo where in the story you had to use weapons for a change which was neat. The battle system should be faster not slower which what they did to Ja(aka Lightsaber Battles) Like in the movies ( new movies you didnt c Slow saber action did you?) I hope with A new Jk game whenever that will be and i hope there will be a new 1 that they would take good things from both games and get rid of the bad things which both games have had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...