lukeiamyourdad Posted December 14, 2002 Author Share Posted December 14, 2002 Originally posted by Admiral Vostok Where are Royal Crusaders supposed to get their shielding from, anyway? They carry around a generator? Seems a bit silly. It's not like they're droidekas with built in generators. They'd have to stick one on the saddle or something. Probably Sith-Well I think that in general the Beserker is better vs all buildings. However, like many pointed out, RCs are better vs turrets and vs droidekas/strike mechs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sithmaster_821 Posted December 15, 2002 Share Posted December 15, 2002 Am I the lone Reb Mountie supporter? They are one of the main reasons i play the rebs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted December 15, 2002 Author Share Posted December 15, 2002 Na. I'm still here man. I like them all equally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swphreak Posted December 17, 2002 Share Posted December 17, 2002 I voted for Berserker cuz I think they look cool. With their 2 sword thingies.... besides, i like Destroyer Droids/Dark Troopers better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted December 17, 2002 Author Share Posted December 17, 2002 Besides the obvious vs buildings/mechs/heavies things, what are your strat with those three units? Like for example using a bunch of RCs with strike mech support and Jedi Masters..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlliedCommander Posted December 17, 2002 Share Posted December 17, 2002 Sith- I stated that the beserker will beat the other two when fighting them. Someone may have thought the RC would beat the beserker. It hadn't been stated yet. My reasoning for the beserker's effectiveness was that it is effective against a variety of units. Being a trooper, the mounty is ineffective in many cases one on one. Of course, it's extremely cheap so it can be massed in moments. It's not a uu, so i think that's partly why people choose the others over it. The rebs mounties are noticeably tougher, but to consider them unique enough they would have to get double attack or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Vostok Posted December 18, 2002 Share Posted December 18, 2002 Well I get a group of usually less than ten Beserkers to quickly take out anything that might annoy the rest of my army, like artillery, AA turrets, etc. I don't really use the other two, but no doubt I'd use them in the same manner due to their speed and close combat attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sithmaster_821 Posted December 20, 2002 Share Posted December 20, 2002 Beserkers aren't very good vs many units at all. They only beat the RC and Mountie cause both are weak vs troopers, and they are a trooper, and the beserker's weakness is ranged attacks, and they both are melee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Vostok Posted December 20, 2002 Share Posted December 20, 2002 True but it's still worth getting a few Beserkers when playing Wookiees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sithmaster_821 Posted December 21, 2002 Share Posted December 21, 2002 Of course you get beserkers when playing as the Wookies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CorranSec Posted December 22, 2002 Share Posted December 22, 2002 Hmm. Yeah. Vostok, no offense, but that might just be added to the 'stupid comments' list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sithmaster_821 Posted December 23, 2002 Share Posted December 23, 2002 Along with bill r and his "the admin better take the stick out of his ass" comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CorranSec Posted December 23, 2002 Share Posted December 23, 2002 Hehe. I wouldn't put that in the list, though..... not that it isn't stupid, of course, but I was more thinking of the 'er, duh' kinds of comments. Bill r's comment can be at the top of the 'suicidal comments' list, if you want. Wait a minute......... Argh! This thread is degenerating! It's becoming Off-Topic! Weird... luke's dad isn't here.... Does anyone else find it scary that it went off-topic as soon as I came? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted December 23, 2002 Author Share Posted December 23, 2002 Originally posted by CorranSec Hehe. I wouldn't put that in the list, though..... not that it isn't stupid, of course, but I was more thinking of the 'er, duh' kinds of comments. Bill r's comment can be at the top of the 'suicidal comments' list, if you want. Wait a minute......... Argh! This thread is degenerating! It's becoming Off-Topic! Weird... luke's dad isn't here.... Does anyone else find it scary that it went off-topic as soon as I came? Bill r was just really stupid. It's like insulting your boss! And I'm still here. I guess we can now blame corran for all the threads that went off-topic!(joke) Let,s try to keep only one thread or two threads off-topic or this will turn into the ''beginning by being on topic and finishing off-topic forum''. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CorranSec Posted December 24, 2002 Share Posted December 24, 2002 Here's what I think we should do: We should try and find a thread that starts off-topic, and then bring it on-topic! The complete reverse of what we've been doing recently. Maybe then the Off-Topic forum and the Galactic Battlegrounds forums could swap names, and everything could just go on as normal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sithmaster_821 Posted December 24, 2002 Share Posted December 24, 2002 Or maybe some of Windu's gems like "the gunship is a recon asset" or "how is critizing someone for something that I do hypocritical?" Ohh.... Back on topic now. Reb mounties rock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Vostok Posted December 24, 2002 Share Posted December 24, 2002 Hey don't pay me out. I said "This is what I use Beserkers for" then sith says "Beserkers aren't good vs units" then I said "but that doesn't stop you from getting them when playing Wookiees". What is so dumb about that? It would be helpful if we could change the names of the threads as the conversation moves on. That way you wouldn't have to remember "okay the Jedi attack post is currently discussing what airspeeders are good for" and so on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted December 24, 2002 Author Share Posted December 24, 2002 That would be really useful! You never can remember what people are talking about because it becomes off-topic after some days... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sithmaster_821 Posted December 24, 2002 Share Posted December 24, 2002 "okay the Jedi attack post is currently discussing what airspeeders are good for" And the SWGB2 thread is talking about jedi attacks (or at least they were) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted December 25, 2002 Author Share Posted December 25, 2002 I guess we always end up talking on the topic of another thread in another thread...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CorranSec Posted December 28, 2002 Share Posted December 28, 2002 That would be pretty helpful. Quickly, let's make a thread entitled "Request for Topic Title Changing"! ..... but that thread will probably turn into some discussion about the relative merits of bananas and printers. Or some such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeiamyourdad Posted December 29, 2002 Author Share Posted December 29, 2002 ........ yes... bananas and printers... of course.... we all like to talk about bananas and printers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CorranSec Posted December 30, 2002 Share Posted December 30, 2002 I really shouldn't ever suggest anything, should I? *ahem* Well, bananas are good, because you can eat them. And they're yellow, and I like yellow. Printers are good because they can print things. But they cost more than bananas, and you can't eat them, and they break easily. So. I think bananas win. But.... wait! You can eat a printer (technically you can eat it, if you break it into little bits)! Doesn't taste very nice though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SE_Vader_536 Posted December 30, 2002 Share Posted December 30, 2002 hey lets not forget that bananas are soft and mushy... ... and printers have paper in them which is made from trees which grow bananas which taste good and have seeds which make more trees which make more bananas and paper. I like bananas... mmmmmm:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sithmaster_821 Posted December 30, 2002 Share Posted December 30, 2002 You could always print a picture of a banana (or print something on a banana, but that may get a little messy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.