taekwondo joe Posted April 23, 2003 Share Posted April 23, 2003 jedi knight was better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prime Posted April 23, 2003 Share Posted April 23, 2003 Originally posted by taekwondo joe jedi knight was better BOOOOOOO! JO forever! Or at least until JA comes out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexandrus Posted April 23, 2003 Share Posted April 23, 2003 I also think JK had a better story line and puzzles, but if you play it now it won't appeal to you much because of the old graphics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HertogJan Posted April 23, 2003 Share Posted April 23, 2003 JO definately. Saber combat in JK was sooo incredibly bad. The levels were pretty boring, because the engine sucked and they were pretty big yes, but without many details (they had NPCs though) and JK too had boring puzzles (like 'where do I have to go', 'what switch do I have to push'). I don't see why the leveldesign in JK was better that the levels in JO! JO had great saberfighting, both in SP as in MP. Although I don't like Kyle, the story was ok. Yeah it didn't have much depth, but c'mon, you think the movies had depth?? Don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taekwondo joe Posted April 23, 2003 Share Posted April 23, 2003 Originally posted by Prime BOOOOOOO! JO forever! Or at least until JA comes out... JK had a better story, better levels, better ending, better main badies, jeric, maw, those guys were cool, desann was a friggen lizard for god sakes, and tavion was a goth looking tinker bell, with that fether, lol. jk also was way more re-playabel, JO had hardly any for me, the only reason i replayed and replayed was because of the spawning cheat. mp for JK had better traps and such, mp for JO is just kinda ok, but the lamers in both really mess it up. saber combat was better in jo, duh the graphics, but thats about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-Vector Posted April 24, 2003 Share Posted April 24, 2003 Must be the easiest poll choice ever, Jedi Knight > Jedi Outcast by a lightyear's difference. LEC should never have allowed Ravensoft to turn the successor to one of my favorite games into their usual Quake (3) engine borathon. Now that Raven have been given the go ahead to work on another quickly churned out sequel, I consider the DF/JK series dead and buried. Thankfully I now have Half-Life 2 to look forward to - Jedi Acadewhat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prime Posted April 24, 2003 Share Posted April 24, 2003 Originally posted by taekwondo joe JK had a better story, better levels, better ending, better main badies, jeric, maw, those guys were cool, desann was a friggen lizard for god sakes, and tavion was a goth looking tinker bell, with that fether, lol. jk also was way more re-playabel, JO had hardly any for me, the only reason i replayed and replayed was because of the spawning cheat. mp for JK had better traps and such, mp for JO is just kinda ok, but the lamers in both really mess it up. saber combat was better in jo, duh the graphics, but thats about it. Although I still prefer JO over JK, these are good points. Fortunately, it sounds like JA will be putting back in much of what made JK great. I certainly love JK as well. Originally posted by X-Vector Now that Raven have been given the go ahead to work on another quickly churned out sequel, I consider the DF/JK series dead and buried. Thankfully I now have Half-Life 2 to look forward to - Jedi Acadewhat? Have fun with Half-Life 2, and you should probably stay away from these boards, otherwise you'll see how much fun we are having with JA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazutoyo Posted April 27, 2003 Share Posted April 27, 2003 JK have awesome levels. Great graphic (for it's time) and superb controls. And two paths (good/evil). The only think I don't like are the video sequences. JK2 is a dissapointment in almost every way. The level design sucks. I do like fighting with my saber, but that's it. Fortunally, in Jedi Academy one will have the saber from the beginning. I only hope that the levels are more epic, and not as boring as in JK2. At the moment I only have the JK2 demo installed. Fighting the reborn over and over again. It's the same thing as the full game. I do wish I waited for JK2 until it was cheap until I buyed it. Oh, and I'm not a multiplayer person, so I have never tried that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boinga1 Posted April 27, 2003 Share Posted April 27, 2003 TRY IT /\ IT IS A MAJOR PART OF JEDI OUTCAST!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prime Posted April 27, 2003 Share Posted April 27, 2003 Originally posted by boinga1 TRY IT /\ IT IS A MAJOR PART OF JEDI OUTCAST!! To boinga1 you listen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neko Lain Posted April 27, 2003 Share Posted April 27, 2003 I remember when i played jedi knight 1, i would play some multi player level, and just explore them for hours. I think that was great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taekwondo joe Posted April 27, 2003 Share Posted April 27, 2003 now dont get me wrong, i do like JO, just i say JK was better, but maybe JA will kick the living crap outa both of em Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prime Posted April 27, 2003 Share Posted April 27, 2003 Originally posted by taekwondo joe now dont get me wrong, i do like JO, just i say JK was better, but maybe JA will kick the living crap outa both of em From the descriptions I've seen so far, it certainly has the potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.