Surfnshannon Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 I'd like the glow names to stay. I really like mine. Anyone else?
edlib Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 I don't have one, but since it doesn't bother me at all: Yes.
DashRendar Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 Uh...sure...I'll sign...oh and BTW, you people that signed first remind me of the people that when the teacher says "Who didn't do their homework" the people say "I did it!"
•-BLaCKouT-• Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 I'll say yes because I've got one and I rather like it. But to be honest, I'm not too fussed either way. Perhaps if they're only turn-onable after a number of posts. Like the custom titles. B.
Father Torque Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 Sorry to say STTCT, and all others who want it. The glowy names cant stay because of the new battlemod. It doesnt support the glowy name, and I dont think the admins will change the hacking codes just to include the glowy names. So, im sorry to say, but this thread is useless.
Nitro Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 You already had your input, pal. Now quit spamming and stow it. For the record: while it doesn't really matter to me, it is a nice feature, so I vote for it.
matt-- Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 Well, if glow names are staying in, then they'll be after a high number of posts, and signature images will also be dependent upon posts.
Surfnshannon Posted July 9, 2003 Author Posted July 9, 2003 Thanks Matt - I don't mind them being like the title status change (after so many posts)
Nitro Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 Originally posted by matt-windu Well, if glow names are staying in, then they'll be after a high number of posts, and signature images will also be dependent upon posts. *cough cough* Hell, yes.
Remi Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 Originally posted by Nitro *cough cough* Hell, yes. You already had your input, pal. Now quit spamming and stow it.
pbguy1211 Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 i like the glow, i vote for it to stay... even though you cant see mine on most forums (it's white)
Father Torque Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 Originally posted by Carl Shutt Hell, yes. Shut your pie hole, and stop annoying STTCT. I didnt mean my post like that, and this thread isnt useless its actually supportinga good cause. I just said that because i didnt think the admins would do it but they did. I have heard you have been raging on her and her threads. This is a great thread now that its been passed. So i say GO PRO GLOW:)
SE_Vader_536 Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 go go glow! cant they find a way around the glitches?
Jo Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 Originally posted by matt-windu Well, if glow names are staying in, then they'll be after a high number of posts, and signature images will also be dependent upon posts. Glows dont bother me at all. but i hate the sig images after a certain about of posts...i mean why can't all have them right off.
Zoom Rabbit Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 I am in favor of keeping the glow function--if it can be done easily enough. Perhaps it could enabled along with the custom title function after 1000 posts. To sum that up succinctly... *Cough! Cough!* Hell, yes.
Ray Jones Posted July 9, 2003 Posted July 9, 2003 Originally posted by STTCT I'd like the glow names to stay. I really like mine. Anyone else? *coughcough* ME! I like yours all. Each single light. So i say, Glow must stay. (nice verse, isnt it? i made it myself..)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.