Blessèd Sith

I DON'T want to sound like a bitch, but I won't stay silent when something needs to be said. (I'm not preaching, but I want *my* side of the story explained, and why I feel and think the way I do and I hope you at least understand why). I'm trying to be as neutral as possible when I say: if "it tastes good" is a permissible reasoning, what other "good" reasonings may we give for our actions? Feels good? I wanted to? I like it? Why stop there? Why not bring back slavery because "it's easier"?

It only counts as an opinion when all those involved have their invested interest weighed. You've only looked at what you want, not the animal. Thus, it is not an opinion, but oppression. Is cannibalism permissible for the reason that human flesh tastes good (according to history, human flesh tastes better than animal)? If I say that I'm of the state of mind that rotting human flesh (humans ARE animals) tastes good under certain conditions, like cooked, does that make it ethical?