toms Posted October 27, 2004 Author Share Posted October 27, 2004 ok, i'll forgive you.... since you are a cute little frog... Report last night said that plans based on the US government energy forcasts are probably flawed as those forcasts rely on saudi arabia trippling it's oil output to cover the doubling demand that will come from india and china. A saudi oil guy said that that people "shouldn't rely on saudi being able to produce that much oil.". They basicallt seemed to be saying that saudi didn't have as much oil as everyone is assuming they have... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowTemplar Posted October 31, 2004 Share Posted October 31, 2004 Originally posted by CagedCrado The government would never get away with supplying all of the united states' power, companies would protest it. It's called nationalising an industry. Companies don't have a say in it. Even if the government did take it over, there is still the fact that over 5 billion dollars would be lost every year, so i dont think that it would be a capable situation. Explanation? Thats not even considering the general loss of power production yearly income, mineral resource factory and processing, and any other unaccounted for business that would be wiped off the face of the country, possibly 100s of billions of dollars a year. Explanation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.