FS_Readfile With Empty Name

[Xenon812]

It WAS working....(as I have read in other posts).

 

Here is the difference. I did have an MSI Mobo, w/AMD K6II 550 Mhz cpu, 512 Mhz Ram, GeForce2 MX card by VisionTek, running Windows Me.

 

The game was choppy when stuff got busy, I was told by some cool peeps here I needed to upgrade my system BADLY, (but at least the game worked!)

So I upgraded.

 

I now have an Asus A7A266 mobo, 1.4 Ghz Athlon, still have 512 Mhz of Ram, I now have a Radeon ATI 7500 board, and am Running Windows 2000.

 

So now, when I boot up the game, it shows the window where you can change your settings, etc. So I go to load a new game, and I get the Jedi Knight 2: Jedi Outcast SP Console, it has a long list of stuff getting initialized, and the last paragraph or so says this:

 

------ Server Initialization ------

JK2: v1.02a win-x86 Mar 4 2002

Server: kejim_post

RE_Shutdown( 0 )

Initializing Shaders

----- CL_Shutdown -----

RE_Shutdown( 1 )

Shutting down OpenGL subsystem

...wglMakeCurrent( NULL, NULL ): success

...deleting GL context: success

...releasing DC: success

...destroying window

...resetting display

...shutting down QGL

...unloading OpenGL DLL

-----------------------

----- Server Shutdown -----

---------------------------

FS_ReadFile with empty name

 

 

Funny...I don't see whay there is a "Server Intitialization setting...I am only trying to play in SP mode...

 

It will not go any further no matter what I do. I have gotten the most recent drivers for EVERYTHING (as I have just built this new machine), so now I am left wondering what gives. I typed the Error message into Google, and came up with only 2 pages of results. All of the results that mentioned the same error message were concerned with peeps playing Quake 3, MOHAA, or Urban Terror.

 

Any info would be most...informative...

 

[Xenon812]

**bump**

 

Anyone? Anyone?

 

Ferris??

[Xenon812]

***Bump**

[Ignodium]

if you had payed any atention to forum rules, you would see that a post which is currently 3 posts behind this is about the same thing. im not sure if he shuold have posted to your thread, or you to his, since yours is older, but you should have just asked there.