Guest crazy_dog Posted September 16, 2001 Share Posted September 16, 2001 I 've read over the net that: in Afganistan all men aged 18-50 are bieng recruited into the armed forces. British and American troops are bieng garrisoned at Pakistan and moved towards Afganistan. World War 3 is brewing up: USA Britain Afganistan rebels VS Taliban Terrorists My advice is to get into a deep underground bunker. Don't forget your PC . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gamma732 Posted September 16, 2001 Share Posted September 16, 2001 Its not going to be WW3. Iraq had a slightly better army then Afghanistan and we demolished them. We didn't even declare war then. And for it to be a World War, it needs to be just that: The world at war, not just 3 countries. If anything, its going to be USA, and allies vs Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, and any other country promoting terrorism. The thing is all those countries have very little in the way of an army, cept for maybe Iraq. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tie Guy Posted September 16, 2001 Share Posted September 16, 2001 Yeah, i think that Calafornia could beat the Talaban and the terrorists. This will be a war, and people will most certainly die, but it won't be a world war like the ones experienced in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Generalchang Posted September 16, 2001 Share Posted September 16, 2001 No, it won't be WW3 but the US will strole in like it owns the world again and kill anyone who is even remotely supected of being a terroist. This is not right, for heaven sakes, it's only 5 days after the attacks! We shouldn't be so quick to jump to our guns, we might kill the wrong person with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gamma732 Posted September 16, 2001 Share Posted September 16, 2001 We're not just killing anyone we think is a terrorist. We're going after Osama bin Laden. We know he's a terrorist. We may not know if he was behind the WTC disaster, but he's even admited being behind the US Embassy bombings and I think the WTC bombing in '93. Even if he's not behind Tuesday's events, if we find him, we all will be much safer overall. And he's a huge name when it comes to terrorism. If we were to interrogate him and/or his followers, theres a good chance they know something . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest crazy_dog Posted September 16, 2001 Share Posted September 16, 2001 I thought they were there to kill him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Admiral Odin Posted September 16, 2001 Share Posted September 16, 2001 also a world war has to involve the entire world/most of it, not just a few countries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.