Admiral Odin Posted March 15, 2001 Share Posted March 15, 2001 Quality is better then quantity and Cracken yes it would be in your dreams I have one word left to say yet by saying this I increase the last word so I no longer have just one word to say I have said many words. Does this mean I should have said I have 343 words to say but if I didn't reach that I would lie again. Oh woeful me. ------------------ "Dulce bellum inexpertis." (Sweet is war to those who have never experinced it.) Roman Proverb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jabba The Hunt Posted March 16, 2001 Share Posted March 16, 2001 must keep post alive ------------------ "The warp cores gone the shield generators have been destoryed beyond repair and the phaser arrays are blown we will never be able to repair all this damage without a starbase" "Dont worry just wait till the next episode and it will all be sorted out" jabbathehunt@hotmail.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR2000Z Posted March 16, 2001 Share Posted March 16, 2001 Yer post is alive but the thread seems to be fading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Tycho Posted March 16, 2001 Share Posted March 16, 2001 It doesn't matter about the thread. It's just about Star Trek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jabba The Hunt Posted March 16, 2001 Share Posted March 16, 2001 ok... sruggle... must keep thread alive... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Redwing Posted March 16, 2001 Share Posted March 16, 2001 Why? ------------------ At last we will reveal ourselves to the Jedi. At last we will have revenge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zoom Rabbit Posted March 16, 2001 Share Posted March 16, 2001 Kill it! Kill it! --D'oh! I just saved it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME_Jeldren Posted March 16, 2001 Share Posted March 16, 2001 Originally posted by Hans The Great: I, for one, liked the idea of putting more science into the show.. Well science is a big joke in ST in you take a closer look at it. ST writers often don't know what they are talking about and make stupid errors. e.g. kilo joule range shields, 300% efficency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jabba The Hunt Posted March 17, 2001 Share Posted March 17, 2001 ok thats fine ive got a flaming thread not im equal with milky 1-1 !!! ------------------ "The warp cores gone the shield generators have been destoryed beyond repair and the phaser arrays are blown we will never be able to repair all this damage without a starbase" "Dont worry just wait till the next episode and it will all be sorted out" jabbathehunt@hotmail.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psycho Tycho Posted March 17, 2001 Share Posted March 17, 2001 Ah, shuddup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Sceltor Posted March 17, 2001 Share Posted March 17, 2001 D00d, just let it die. Start a new topic or something. Maybe with the purpose of Duke Bashing. Yeah, that'd work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hans The Great Posted March 19, 2001 Share Posted March 19, 2001 Not all of the science is a big joke, I think the "Hiesenberg Compensators" on the transporters is funny though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest garyah99 Posted March 19, 2001 Share Posted March 19, 2001 Actually, not ALL of the science in Star Trek was a joke. If you look at the technology 35 years ago, consider the original communicator and look at today's cell phones. Consider the tricorders and scanners and look at today's CAT scanners and MRI technology. I have it on very good authority that with the advances in computer and microchip technlogy, it IS conceivable that within 20 years it will be possible to build a CT scanner that WILL fit in the palm of your hand! Consider the advances in Computers themselves. Who would have though 35 years ago that we would have what we do today! Laser technology, particle beam weapons, atomic fusion and many of the concepts from Star Trek are in the foreseeable future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nute Gunray Posted March 19, 2001 Share Posted March 19, 2001 I hate how they just make stuff up that SOUNDS sciencey, like putting quantum in front of the noun so it SOUNDS advanced or something. There was an episode of Voyager where their was a subplot or something (it was a long time ago, i forget much of it) that there were things called "quantum fleas" ro something living in the computer core. I said wtf and never watched star trek EVER AGAIN. I don't 300% efficiency is impossible, but it is extremely outlandish. A modern nuclear powered vessel can take their reactor up to 110% or 115% power output but at incredible risk to the ship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zoom Rabbit Posted March 20, 2001 Share Posted March 20, 2001 You mean to tell me I just wasted $400 on quantum flea collars for my cats?!? *(Flips out.)* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME_Jeldren Posted March 20, 2001 Share Posted March 20, 2001 300% efficency is impossible by definition. The reactor isn't 100% efficient if you can increase the power output. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Redwing Posted March 20, 2001 Share Posted March 20, 2001 Good point. ------------------ At last we will reveal ourselves to the Jedi. At last we will have revenge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted March 20, 2001 Share Posted March 20, 2001 the 300% rating is the capabilty of the equipment to run over a baseline mark set in a theoretical labratory, 100% is the minimum efficincy that a ST Engine should run at... Originally posted by ME_Jeldren: Well science is a big joke in ST in you take a closer look at it. ST writers often don't know what they are talking about and make stupid errors. e.g. kilo joule range shields, 300% efficency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.