Compa_Mighty Posted October 7, 2001 Share Posted October 7, 2001 I mean, I think Ep1 was quite a good movie, perfect for the start of the saga. AotC, Lucas explained he wanted the title to sound 50's-like, so it would seem an older movie than the original 3. An extra question, (I think I've asked it before) but waht's wrong with Jar Jar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EndSub Posted October 7, 2001 Share Posted October 7, 2001 he was comic relief aimed at 8 yr olds.......we arn't 8 yr olds...... i mean we have qui-gon (spelling?) dieing in a light saber battle and bloody jar-jar has got a droide stuck to his foot......if they just took out jokes like that he wouldn't be so bad...... and I don't mind Epiosode 2's title Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Luke Skywalker Posted October 7, 2001 Share Posted October 7, 2001 If youve read the whole series you would know that the title fits it just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tie Guy Posted October 7, 2001 Share Posted October 7, 2001 Well, if you look at the other titles and things in Star Wars, you will see that Attack of the Clones is a natural. The Empire Strikes Back?!? How obvious is that. Return of the Jedi?!? I wonder what happens in that one. The Empire?!? couldn't they be a little more original The Rebellion?!? Hmm, whatever could they be doing? The Republic?!? I wonder what type of government they are You get the idea Lucas has always been one for straight-forward names. why should he change it now? Oh, and i'd tell you why no one liked Jar-Jar, but you can only have 1000 words in a post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.