Guest emupiett Posted February 24, 2001 Share Posted February 24, 2001 Thrawn: Belay that order. I shall go out myself, since our fleet is not doing so well. Zamarus, I shall give orders from my TIE. Launch 10 squadrons of TIE Interceptors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Expert Rookie Posted February 25, 2001 Share Posted February 25, 2001 Zamarus: Yes Grand Admiral. Zamarus: Communications, tell the ISDs Bellicose,Assasin, and Adjudicator to launch 3 squadrons of TIE interceptors each. Ship Operations, tell hangar bay 2 to launch 6 TIE Interceptors. Communications/Ship Oper: (in unison) Yes sir. *Bellicose, Assasin, and Adjudicator all launch 3 squadrons of Interceptors each. The SSD Knight's Hammer 2 launches 6 Interceptors as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted February 25, 2001 Share Posted February 25, 2001 ***OUT OF STORY*** Thrawn was killed by the Federation Originally posted by emupiett: Thrawn: Belay that order. I shall go out myself, since our fleet is not doing so well. Zamarus, I shall give orders from my TIE. Launch 10 squadrons of TIE Interceptors. To Bad... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted February 25, 2001 Share Posted February 25, 2001 R9's Fleet lies in wait silently, knowing that the time for it to join in the fight will be soon...Rogue9 will not attack until the Imperial Fleet is in Jupiters Gravity well and unable to Jump to Hyperspace... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Expert Rookie Posted February 25, 2001 Share Posted February 25, 2001 Zamarus: Prepare to jump to hyperspace to Galaxy 382 (Milky Way). Navigation: Yes sir. Plotting.... Nav: Course plotted. Zamarus: Engage. *Zamarus's fleet goes to hyperspace* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Expert Rookie Posted February 25, 2001 Share Posted February 25, 2001 Nav: Sir, we are on the outer boundaries of Galaxy 368. Approx. 20,000 light years from the Earth system. Zamarus: Very Well, take us out of hyperspace. *Zamarus's fleet goes out of hyperspace* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Expert Rookie Posted February 25, 2001 Share Posted February 25, 2001 Zamarus: Deploy the fleet. I want this galaxy searched out. Leave the Bellicose, Colosses, Courageous, and the ISDIII Death's Head. Comm: Yes sir. Zamarus: Deploy probe droids. Ship Oper: Yes sir, contacting hangar bay 5. Zamarus: Dispatch TIE Defender squadrons, Alpha, Elite Beta, and Lightning to patrol the area. Ship Oper: Yes sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted February 25, 2001 Share Posted February 25, 2001 ***OUT OF STORY*** I already told you I was in the SOL System... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted February 25, 2001 Share Posted February 25, 2001 Rogue9's Fleet begins to strew Remotely Detonated Anti-Matter Mines throughout Federation Space... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest emupiett Posted February 25, 2001 Share Posted February 25, 2001 ***OUT OF STORY*** When was Thrawn killed? I made him escape everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted February 25, 2001 Share Posted February 25, 2001 ***OUT OF STORY*** he was sucked into a subspace rift on page 7, no one escaped his ship... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest emupiett Posted February 25, 2001 Share Posted February 25, 2001 **OUT OF STORY*** Ok. I didn't get that one before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Merlinmast Posted February 26, 2001 Share Posted February 26, 2001 OUT OF STORY I didn't get a chance to really read this one but I don't know why it got by the post. Everyone know that Star Wars ships were built for more speed and firepower than even the most powerful of Federation ships. The Klingon might have an advantage because of their (cheap?) cloking technology but other than that, photon torpedoes fired once every 10 min (or more) compared to constant proton torpedoes, concussion missiles, mag pusles, etc., its no contest. Who is 'defending' startrek anyway? I thought we were starwars fans! I certainly hope they got there but kicked (somewhere in all that mess of a story). ------------------ "Why do I have to have a signature? Oh... you mean I don't...?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted February 26, 2001 Share Posted February 26, 2001 hate to break it too you but startrek ships are more powerful, their phasers can fire in any direction, Quantum torpeodoes are a hundred times more powerful than a (starwars) proton torpedeo and StarTrek sheilds operate differently and they are not effected much by laser, the most powerful ship in starwars is the suncrusher and it can be defeated by any ship from startrek mounting isolidic weaponry wich will open a subspace rift, suck a ship in and kill it...I know more about StarWars and Star Trek than most of you will ever forget. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Merlinmast Posted February 26, 2001 Share Posted February 26, 2001 OOC: Well mister I-know-everything if you want to get technical you know, you would never hit a single damn starfighter in starwars because they are too damn fast so it don't matter if you can fire in any direction, unless you are going to say that star trek ships have super lock on systems and never miss in which you really should listen to yourself. Its like saying, who's stronger? Batman or superman. Well duh superman is stronger but who realistically is stronger? Superman is only strong because he's super. Batman uses state of the art equipment (more realistic) now I won't argue that startrek ships may be able to make rifts or that it won't suck a ship in. But the technology in startrek is more farfetched (or more advanced) than starwars which is set a long time ago not 9000 years in the future. The technology is more rugged. Heck, in startrek, most people are striving for peace and not money so how can you say that their circumstances are valid to make them better than starwars. I don't care how much you know, but if startrek is better because they have better shields and better lasers and better tracking and better weapons and better drives, well then DUH! Of course if all you say is that they are better, that is all that can be deducted. They are 'super' compared to the more rugged and realistic (of our future) star wars feel. So eat that brainiac! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted February 26, 2001 Share Posted February 26, 2001 I am not saying they are better just with different strengths...also as to thestarfighter being faster...there hyperspace drive is faster than warp,but there sub-light drives are far slower than starfleet ships, the reality is that the Rebellion and Federation would have been allies against the imperials so I see no reason why I must choose which I like better...although if forced I would choose StarWars. also no offense to anyone who else who knows alot about both I just tend to Rave fanaticaly about things I feel are (even though it is all fake, which I realize.)<font size=1>" don't except it though"</ONT> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME_Jeldren Posted February 27, 2001 Share Posted February 27, 2001 Originally posted by Rogue 9: hate to break it too you but startrek ships are more powerful, their phasers can fire in any direction, Quantum torpeodoes are a hundred times more powerful than a (starwars) proton torpedeo and StarTrek sheilds operate differently and they are not effected much by laser, the most powerful ship in starwars is the suncrusher and it can be defeated by any ship from startrek mounting isolidic weaponry wich will open a subspace rift, suck a ship in and kill it...I know more about StarWars and Star Trek than most of you will ever forget. Federation torps are in the MT range SW Turbolasers (plasma weapons not lasers) are GT range weapons. The empire totally outclasses the federation when it come to firepower,duability, production capabilities and numbers. The empire could simply send one ship from every imperial world and any Federation world would be attacked by about 80,000 ships. [This message has been edited by ME_Jeldren (edited February 27, 2001).] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted February 27, 2001 Share Posted February 27, 2001 Star Trek has many Advanteges, Transporters key among them, while Spacial Distortions such as Federation Sheilds will stop them, normal energy sheilds such as those used to guard starwars ships do not stop them, in other words a federation starship could fly through a formation of imps beaming explosives directly into the engine core. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted February 28, 2001 Share Posted February 28, 2001 ***OUT OF STORY*** This is a Pointless Argument so I'm not going to pursue it any further I like StarWars more than StarTrek and I didn't Mean to <FONT SIZE=1>Insult anyone I just get carried away with the moment.</FONT> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME_Jeldren Posted February 28, 2001 Share Posted February 28, 2001 ST and SW have a different philosophy. SW is more about war and their ships behave like WW2 ship. ST is more about exploration and their ships behave like colonial age ships. Continuity isn't a strong point of ST. ST episodes often violate each other. ST writers also sometimes make stupid errors like kilo joule range shields. The SW is more belivable than the federation socialist heaven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME_Jeldren Posted February 28, 2001 Share Posted February 28, 2001 Originally posted by Rogue 9: Star Trek has many Advanteges, Transporters Forget transporters they get blocked by virtually anything in the series. A fight between the Empire and the Federation whould be like a fight between the US and Cuba. If you want a fair SW vs ST fight then let the empire fight 8472 or the Borg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted February 28, 2001 Share Posted February 28, 2001 I Agree the Federation is Geared more towards explorartion than warfare but answer this do you think a D'Derix Class Romulan Warbird could kill a Star Detroyer, and yes Continuity sux in ST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted March 1, 2001 Share Posted March 1, 2001 and as far as transporters being blocked by everything, nothing completely blocks them in voyager, which was the pinacle of Federation technology when it was launched, shortly before being zipped away by the caretaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME_Jeldren Posted March 1, 2001 Share Posted March 1, 2001 I don't think that the warbird has a chance against an ISD. The ISDs giga ton range heavy turbolaser will kill it pretty quickly. An ISD can withstand the firepower of another ISD for sevral minutes. ST ships have much less endurance based on the series. I don't think that the romulan ship will survive a 140GT ISD broadside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rogue 9 Posted March 1, 2001 Share Posted March 1, 2001 A Warbird can Cloak sneak up on the star destroyer and rip its bridge to shreds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.