stubert Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 and they want their programming language back =pppp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dom_152 Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 C is a perfectly usable language I don't see why you have such a problem in using it :S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ensiform Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Cos there are newer, better languages to use. And most are OOP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dom_152 Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 Yeah I prefer OOP but C is still fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razorace Posted November 12, 2006 Share Posted November 12, 2006 I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinny Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Technically I thought C was oop, just without the class support. I like C because of the speed . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razorace Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 C is not a object oriented language. C++'s classes impliment OOP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dom_152 Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Some people get confused about C beeing OOP because of structures. But you must remember that before the arrival of C++, C structures could only hold data and it wasn't untill C++ came around that support for functions were added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ensiform Posted November 13, 2006 Share Posted November 13, 2006 Technically I thought C was oop, just without the class support. I like C because of the speed . C++ is no slower than C; at least not visibly. A couple of nanoseconds maybe but that is very small. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinny Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 A couple of nanoseconds per... if its instruction that'd be a lot of time wasted, if its for a bunch of function executions then yeah its hardly noticable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stubert Posted November 14, 2006 Author Share Posted November 14, 2006 don't think of c++ being nanoseconds slower, think of it as being several times slower than C the fact that this is all in nanoseconds is what makes it irrelevant and yea, C++ is has a very dynamic style to it. I've been reading up on Objective C which looks much more like modern java than anything else but it's very very closely related to C (in fact the Obective C extentions were first part of cc (as opposed to g++)) also, i've been doing alot of work in writting a theorem prover in haskell, and it's pretty leet http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.