Dark_Hunter Posted February 21, 2007 Posted February 21, 2007 Ok here's one for ya. In the AT-ATs. The new guns are defiantely improvements over the ones in SWB1, but the secondary fire blasters are way better than the primary ones in every aspect. They shoudl make one good against infantry and one good against vehicles. Post Away.
MachineCult Posted March 1, 2007 Posted March 1, 2007 ^ If you don't know what to type then don't type anything, n00b, this isn't a chatroom. The AT-ATs guns are much better than in SWBF1, but they've balanced it out by making them much easier to take down.
Halo_92 Posted March 1, 2007 Posted March 1, 2007 Okay, I get what hes saying. Yes they are much better in the 1st one as is almost everything else.
vader815 Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 how about a main gun like the one in bf1 but fires more often, kind of like in the movies
DanteRedson Posted March 10, 2007 Posted March 10, 2007 The guns fire rate is alot faster than SWBF1 which is good, on my opinion.
Dark_Hunter Posted March 12, 2007 Author Posted March 12, 2007 yeah, the should just just have one blaster with a high rate of fire which does medium damage to vehicles and infantry, like in the films.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.