razorace Posted January 27, 2003 Share Posted January 27, 2003 Has anyone else checked this function out? 90% of the code in it is redundent! Heck, 2 of 3 inputs aren't even USED! Anyone know why Raven didn't just comment out all that extra code? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Code Posted January 27, 2003 Share Posted January 27, 2003 would "beeing lazy" answer this just kiding i have no clue my self just some speculation maybe it was used by something that they removed at the last minute and forgot about that part like the atst or stuff like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
razorace Posted January 27, 2003 Author Share Posted January 27, 2003 I'm guessing that it was done in a hurry with a quick cut-and-paste job from the SP source. The redundent code seems legit, it's just cancelled out with some thrown in stuff at the end. Maybe they changed the functions farther "downstream" from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.