tFighterPilot Posted March 17, 2004 Share Posted March 17, 2004 Originally posted by Glacius1 I dont really like the idea of forcing an auto balance. Sometimes in BF42 you were outnumbered, and you end up getting pushed right back to your main base or spawn point. It was kinda fun defending the base against a bigger enemy. BF42 rarely ends up with teams that are uneven enough to affect the outcome, but like I said, sometimes it adds a different spin on the map, and startegies must be rethought. The only time I can see things getting out of hand are when the federation plays the clones, that or the hoth level, Im guessing lots of people will want to cram the AT-AT's. But then that would be half the fun again, defending the trenches against the stronger imperial force:monkey4: No way dude, I'm taking the Snow Speeder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountainforest Posted March 17, 2004 Author Share Posted March 17, 2004 In Jedi Academy Siege, it's a;ways the case that players change party after one round, so they could play that partie again the second round. I always have to change teams (and others too of course) to keep it fair. That doesn't mean I don't want to play the other team for a while. So those players are ruining the game for others. I think you have similar players in other games. There should be a option that players can't switch teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.