Mountainforest Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 Originally posted by Navix_Ceraq not if your driving it in third person view. But what about first person view? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S[e]NtRy Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 yup i saw that movie on ign, its awsome haha. Can't wait! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nortenyo Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 Originally posted by Mountainforest Do you know how it works if two people are piloting an AT-AT? If the shootermoves the head to shoot something, won't that effect the view of the pilot? It is very much like the AT-ST...the driver controls the head, chin guns, and the vehicle. The co-pilot controls the ear guns which are great for taking out snowspeeders and infantry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostfacedKilla Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 Originally posted by Dragnarr Besides what good it is to see the sniper when you are lying on the ground dead . Im just saying an army of elite snipers could take down all the enemy infantry it seems, then just add couple of Heavy Weapons dude and yeah on a clear map like Geonosis, the enemy has no hope. Just introducing my clan strategies Ure snipa clan better be dam good bcuz never really works. one too many snipas in socom and ure team is as good as dead. it never really worked out well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SITH_ShadowCat Posted August 29, 2004 Share Posted August 29, 2004 Originally posted by nortenyo It is very much like the AT-ST...the driver controls the head, chin guns, and the vehicle. The co-pilot controls the ear guns which are great for taking out snowspeeders and infantry. Nortenyo, are you some sort of developer or tester? How do you know all this information? I'm not doubting any of the info you present, but I'm just curios about how you know such information. If the info is true, then one of my worries has been put to rest: Getting to actually control the AT-AT. I had a feeling the devs may have given such a job to AI because they may have thought that driving something as slow may be boring (I don't believe so, the reason I got into this game is for the soul reason that I get to pilot an AT-AT). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nortenyo Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 Originally posted by SITH_ShadowCat Nortenyo, are you some sort of developer or tester? How do you know all this information? I'm not doubting any of the info you present, but I'm just curios about how you know such information. If the info is true, then one of my worries has been put to rest: Getting to actually control the AT-AT. I had a feeling the devs may have given such a job to AI because they may have thought that driving something as slow may be boring (I don't believe so, the reason I got into this game is for the soul reason that I get to pilot an AT-AT). I know how you feel. My dreams came true when I found out you can pilot an AT-AT. My all time fav vehicle. If you love the AT-AT, then you will love this game. I play HOTH over and over. As you would expect the AT-AT is slow, but powerful. I don't mind that it is slow. This doesn't surprise me as a fan. I know that it is slow. I wouldn't want it to be faster. It wouldn't be true to the original, otherwise. You remember that part of ESB when an AT-AT is firing it's chin guns, and then it sort of turns a bit so that it can quickly shoot down an approaching snowspeeder with the ear guns, and then resumes firing at infantry with its chin guns? I had a moment like that in the game. It was soooo cool. I know because I work here at Pandemic on Battlefront. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragnarr Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 Arghhhhhhhhhhhhh stop teasing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clone_Fighter Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 Damn... Just CANT wait to get this game!!! But 25 days remaining to get it where I live... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0MERCURY0 Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 I feel your pain, why must we get everthing later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clone_Fighter Posted August 30, 2004 Share Posted August 30, 2004 Who knows.. Probably because the game is made in America (I believe), and we live in Europe. Well well, have always been like that. We're getting used to it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountainforest Posted September 5, 2004 Share Posted September 5, 2004 What would be the weak spot of the AT-ST? I've read it takes about for proton torpedoes to take it down, but if you hit the right spot, it should go more easier. Will you have to hot the legs or the head? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clone_Fighter Posted September 5, 2004 Share Posted September 5, 2004 The torpedos are kinda "heatseeking", it steers to the best position on the AT-ST, on the head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syzerian Posted September 6, 2004 Share Posted September 6, 2004 You gus should know that the reason you cant headshot the driver of an AT-AT because of the powerful shielding on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revlt Coranier Posted September 6, 2004 Share Posted September 6, 2004 An AT-AT's armor is too powerful to be pierced by T-47 laser bolts. In ESB when the AT-AT falls down, then gets blown up with four laser bolts, that puzzles me and pisses me off so badly because I can't figure out why it works that way. The neck of an AT-AT is not (heavily) armored. Only one AT-AT had a (heavily) armored neck, and that was the AT-AT of some paranoid Imperial officer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountainforest Posted September 6, 2004 Share Posted September 6, 2004 Originally posted by Clone_Fighter The torpedos are kinda "heatseeking", it steers to the best position on the AT-ST, on the head. That makes being the hev wep guy far less chalenging. I'm really dissapointed about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SITH_ShadowCat Posted September 6, 2004 Share Posted September 6, 2004 Originally posted by Mountainforest That makes being the hev wep guy far less chalenging. I'm really dissapointed about that. It takes several rockets to take out an AT-ST, and the reload time is long, plus, the driver could know where the rocket came from and fire away effectivly killing the heavy weapons person with splash damage. If its not skill to single handandle take out an AT-ST then I don't know what is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clone_Fighter Posted September 6, 2004 Share Posted September 6, 2004 Originally posted by Mountainforest That makes being the hev wep guy far less chalenging. I'm really dissapointed about that. The hev wep guy might be dead before the 2nd shot . It takes about 4-5 shots on head to get rid of an AT-ST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insanellama Posted September 6, 2004 Share Posted September 6, 2004 well there's 3 at-sts on endor so chances are if ur shooting at an at-st there's another one behind it that has u in its sights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.