JCarter426 Posted April 22, 2008 Share Posted April 22, 2008 And it would make sense since love and attachments at the time weren't banned as of yet considering the whole Nomi Sunrider, Andur, Ulic thing just forty years before and how Jolee says he wasn't supposed to get married. Which I believe JJM might be fixing that little screw up on Biowares part - and then continued by Avellone. See? Not all bad. Actually, the comics have it that marriage and conception are frowned upon, but the Draays are an exception because they're rich and powerful (because Mr Miller always has to make a political statement ). Oh, and a different set of KOTOR comics already retconned the whole thing. Duron Qel-Droma's relationship with Whatserface was discouraged, and it led to both of their deaths (or some such), a good deal before K1. As for Ulic and Nomi, the implication is that their relationship led to the no attachments rule in the first place. And as for Jolee and Nayama, if I recall correctly, the Jedi were more upset that he trained her than they were when he married her. So marriage was frowned upon, but not forbidden. Fornication is another matter, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_shot_the_jedi Posted April 22, 2008 Author Share Posted April 22, 2008 While I don't know for certain if Kreia is in fact Arren Kae, I do know that-that pic is a fake. This one from wookiepedia shows the actual undhooded version of Kreia. Yes, I'm glad that you noticed that! The image is in fact a combination of the Krynda and Kreia images, hence the caption "Krynda... possibly?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.