Bigsexy2009 Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 In certain reviews ive read this game has been given as a dark one of the lucas arts chain and such, when i played it i was hooked. Yeah some puzzle were ridicuously impossible but all in all was an entertaining game to play on, the first non humour one although there were one liners here and there which were probably unintentionally funny Maybe its me but why do they have bad reviews? i loved this game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Threepwood4life Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 I think its cause LucasArts were known for their humour in their games and cause The Dig had a serious tone and took 6 years to develop the SCUMM engine by the end of 1995 had started to show its age and many reviewers reckoned it should have had an updated engine. I think its gone down as a forgotten treasure in the Lucas Catalogue of games and everyone who has not played this should give it a chance its one of the most underrated games ever developed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigersong Posted November 2, 2013 Share Posted November 2, 2013 Yeah, The Dig is pretty darned cool. So are adventure games in general- something our current generation of shoot-'em-up gamers might not realize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.