KillerBee Posted July 7, 2001 Posted July 7, 2001 Constant quality is also important.. Imo HL got worse nearer the end. as did jk..
CaptainRAVE Posted July 7, 2001 Posted July 7, 2001 Yea, they run out of ideas and the game starts to get really repetative. Im surprised Half Life kept us hooked as long as it did.
Chewie_Rips Posted July 7, 2001 Posted July 7, 2001 Well, I agree the longer the better, without getting to boring.HL, for me, was repetitive and old after about half-way through. The longest game I have played, that after I was finished, I still wanted more was.......Legands of Zelda, OOT for N64.( I hate to use that as an example...but its the truth) If they could make this game half as long, with the same excitment througout, I would be satisfied....but all in all MP is were the game holds its value for me, so even if the game is 15 hours in length, I'll get over it because of MP...
CaptainRAVE Posted July 7, 2001 Posted July 7, 2001 Not too short like EF......but at least that game offered some variety i suppose.
C.H.A.S. Posted July 9, 2001 Posted July 9, 2001 It would be nice if they would have about as many levels as JK1 but have the levels be bigger.
CaptainRAVE Posted July 9, 2001 Posted July 9, 2001 I thought i read somewhere that it was going to be longer than JK. That must have been when it was first announced.....they must have changed their mind now Thats one area that lets a lot of raven games down....their too short
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.