DarthTenor Posted October 26, 2001 Posted October 26, 2001 Well i personally loved AOK and the Civs where actually diferse enough to warant different strengths and weaknesses. Notice there are civs more prominant in the FLUSH Strength and some civs that are best orinted "defensive." It seems as thought Lucas arts is not going that route. I think GB is diverse enough with the civs alreadyh. Even Playing both Rebels and Empire feels different. Perhaps because of the different art sets. Each civ will have certain advantages and will probably play differently enough to promote different strategies. Rebels (Strong Air/Troopers/Jedi) Empire (Strong Mechs/jedi/Troopers) Gungans (Mechs/Ships) Naboo (Air/Jedi/Ships) Wookies (Stronger troopers/Air) TRade Federation (Mechs/Ships?) All have certain unique techs as well to strengthen their uniqueness. All in all the game shoud be balanced enough where there will be no ultimate dominate civ.
Guest WC_heavyarms Posted October 26, 2001 Posted October 26, 2001 well, in AoK, it was so badly one-sided. You would fight pretty much the same things every time, Mostly just huge hordes of siege onagers and paladins in Dm's. In Gb though, There will be a lot more to consider, like what to use, because battles will NOT be one sided, like AoK.
Guest Admiral Thrawn Posted October 28, 2001 Posted October 28, 2001 What do you hate more, Pal rushing or flushing?
JEDI_MASTA Posted October 28, 2001 Posted October 28, 2001 im not really sure theyll like it now (mind change) because most of them are not star wars fans but hopefully im wrong
Paragon_Leon Posted October 29, 2001 Posted October 29, 2001 yes you are. i am a VERY fanatic AOC player, and a big SW-nut. so the two DO combine.
Zygomaticus Posted October 31, 2001 Posted October 31, 2001 im a big aoe2 fan and i think this game is almost an exact replica of aoe2 except that its Star wars
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.