JEDI_MASTA Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 If you live in the usa like i do i think you should know that this anti terrorism bill took away alot of your 4th amendment rights weather u wanna blieve it or not it happened Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthfergie Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Anit-terrorisn bill??? Sorry I havn't been following the news that much latly...not enough military action shown...but I did like the video of Northern Alliance cavalry attacking Taliban position... horses ridding up with arabs on them with AK-47s:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tie Guy Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Originally posted by JEDI_MASTA If you live in the usa like i do i think you should know that this anti terrorism bill took away alot of your 4th amendment rights weather u wanna blieve it or not it happened Well, thats the nature of government. The people give up certain rights to the government in order to allow the government to protect them. Although we may loose some rights, we can accept it if it keeps many more people safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Luke Skywalker Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 I live in Canada but I do have an opinion on that and it is; Instead of pushing it so fast to become law the government should have developed it more and decided on the consiquences of such a bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hannibal Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Originally posted by Luke Skywalker I live in Canada but I do have an opinion on that and it is; Instead of pushing it so fast to become law the government should have developed it more and decided on the consiquences of such a bill. Canadians, always making sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Olsmo Lahun Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 im Canadien and haven't been listening to the news:( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kuma Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Bad news Luke, the Canadian Gov has passed or preparing to pass the same type of Law (in fact it has just about the same wording) The W_I_D_E definition they gave of terrorists or terrorism acts in this law is quite frightening. ANY Protest of ANY gov policy can be defined as terrorism with this law(.The definition goes something like this "Any attempt to change gov policy by coercition" is a terrorist act). Big brother here we come...Oh, sorry , i think it's called new world order. I guess our gov envy the chinese way of doing things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Luke Skywalker Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Yes, I know. But its not like anyone is going to protest against Anti-Terrorism. No one is going to apose it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDI_MASTA Posted November 3, 2001 Author Share Posted November 3, 2001 ok ok the US government thought it was nescessary i believe it isnt I truthfully (prepares to run for cover)think a Nuclear bomb into Kabul (the afgan capital) would do the trick of course some of those nations would go balistic but do u really think their gunna do anything with visious of their capital suffring the same fate all a nuclear bomb is is a normal bomb that does a much better job of blowing up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Admiral Odin Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Originally posted by Kuma The W_I_D_E definition they gave of terrorists or terrorism acts in this law is quite frightening. ANY Protest of ANY gov policy can be defined as terrorism with this law(.The definition goes something like this "Any attempt to change gov policy by coercition" is a terrorist act). Big brother here we come...Oh, sorry , i think it's called new world order. That would falll under the first amendment. Right to free speech. There are terrorist groups that have websites on servers in the USA but because of the 1st amend. The gov. can't do anything about it. Also from what I know of the bill. It is just widening the powers of a warrant to tap a person phone lines and the likes. You will still need to go to a judge to approve the taps, and other warrants. I'll remind you that our rights are not infinet but do have limits. When you set up a gov. you place limits on your rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDI_MASTA Posted November 3, 2001 Author Share Posted November 3, 2001 it also said "this document shall NOT be infringed" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tie Guy Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Originally posted by JEDI_MASTA it also said "this document shall NOT be infringed" Well, if they want to do something major with rights, then they'd have to have an ammendment, otherwise it wouldn't get past the supreme court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TieDefender75 Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 OMG ME AND MASTA SPEAK THE SAME LANGUAGE!!!! JUST LAUNCH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Maul403 Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 in anwser to ur question JEDI_MASTA, i say no i do not think so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEDI_MASTA Posted November 4, 2001 Author Share Posted November 4, 2001 if you wanna b leive it or not i dont care my new philosophy F2C (free 2 choose) but u should stay informed and this IS what is going on now so i suggest u BELIEVE your masta;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.