JediMasterEd Posted March 12, 2002 Posted March 12, 2002 My teacher gives us UpFront Newsweek Magazines and it says that Iraq may be next. "The clock is ticking," says Muhammed Jassem al-Saqer, member of Kuwait's Parliment. "The later you move, the more dangerous he becomes." "There may be times when we have to act alone," says Powell. "We can't have our national interest constrained by the views of the colalition." Should this go to the UN or should we handle it wiether or not the UN peace committe says no?
Heavyarms Posted March 12, 2002 Posted March 12, 2002 no. Israel will be assisted and fast. It is a powder keg that can ignite with one bullet. Iraq is no real threat: you deal with the worst situation first.
Crazy_dog no.3 Posted March 12, 2002 Posted March 12, 2002 Why make Iraq the next target? OK, I admit they suck in RA2, but haven't your American troops done enough damage there already. I think maybe Mr. Bush is trying to repeat what his dad done, only he got more hi-tech.
Redwing Posted March 12, 2002 Posted March 12, 2002 At least he has a good reason. Freeing the world of terrorism...there's a worthy mission. Of course, it could go horribly wrong, but everything has a risk to it.
Clefo Posted March 12, 2002 Posted March 12, 2002 Iraq may be the king assholes of Asia, but they aren't too terrorist affiliated, not as much as say Libya or Syria. I think we should just keep a watchful eye on them, but not rush into any military action...
Crazy_dog no.3 Posted March 12, 2002 Posted March 12, 2002 U Americans can do what u want, but we Russians are gonna sit down and mind no-ones bisness, exept for maybe the Chechen Rebels.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.