Fergrim Posted April 7, 2002 Share Posted April 7, 2002 Kind of curious.. I heard geforce4 mx sucked.. and..well..you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyclone Posted April 7, 2002 Share Posted April 7, 2002 The GeForce4 MX doesn't really suck, its just that its not as good as a higher end Geforce 3, so it is kind of a dissappointment in that sense. We expected more from the Geforce4 line. The regular Geforce4 cards are great, but the MX is somewhat neutered. It just kinda left things confusing where some G4 cards are better than the G3, and others aren't. Anyway, I just finished up the game with a GF2/GTS and it looked great, so I suspect that the game on a GF4mx will look great as well. Cyclone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul-Burn Posted April 7, 2002 Share Posted April 7, 2002 *Ahem* He said "Geforce4 TI4600 128mb DDR".. TI4600... f**K you!@%@#%^@^#$^ That card can render Q3/JK at 60fps STABLE with 1600x1200x32. @#%^#@$^#$&$%& Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingDead Posted April 8, 2002 Share Posted April 8, 2002 Hiarchy of video cards: GeForce4 4600 GeForce4 4400 GeForce4 4200 GeForce3 500 GeForce3 classic GeForce3 200 GeForce4 MX4600 GeForce2 Ultra GeForce4 MX4400 GeForce2 GTS/TI/PRO GeForce DDR GeForce4 MX420 GeForce2 MX400 GeForce2 MX GeForce SDR GeForce2 MX200 TNT2 Ultra TNT2 Pro TNT2 M64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul-Burn Posted April 8, 2002 Share Posted April 8, 2002 I've got a black and white Herculess video card running at a beautiful 400x300 resolution! (had, it got burnt with that old XT... ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karnesh Posted April 8, 2002 Share Posted April 8, 2002 I have a Geforce 4 Ti4600 running with an Athlon XP 1900+ processor, 3GB of PC2100 SDRAM, and 400Gb of HDD space. Now I just need a decent monitor, as the best I can play is 1600x1200 on mine before it has a fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingDead Posted April 9, 2002 Share Posted April 9, 2002 Originally posted by karnesh I have a Geforce 4 Ti4600 running with an Athlon XP 1900+ processor, 3GB of PC2100 SDRAM, and 400Gb of HDD space. Now I just need a decent monitor, as the best I can play is 1600x1200 on mine before it has a fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lostman Posted April 9, 2002 Share Posted April 9, 2002 in regards to the above post, he could be right, he doesn't say anything about what kind of no name monitor he has. I have a 19" monitor and I can't really crank it over 1024 x 768. In regards to the Geforce question. Are you stupid? The 4600 is top of the line. If you spent $400 on a card and don't know what it does then you need to send me all your money. The Geforce 4 MX is based on the Geforce 2 chipset with a higher clock speed. It's a budget card and is not meant for pumping out a crapload of frames per second. I've got a GF3 Ti500 and that will do me just fine. F R A G N A S T I K A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNaray8442 Posted April 10, 2002 Share Posted April 10, 2002 quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by karnesh I have a Geforce 4 Ti4600 running with an Athlon XP 1900+ processor, 3GB of PC2100 SDRAM, and 400Gb of HDD space. Now I just need a decent monitor, as the best I can play is 1600x1200 on mine before it has a fit. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- to the dude that posted the B.S> meter, he has a chance of not lying, go check out: GamersHQ People ahve systems there that are over clocked to 2.9ghz, pc2700 RAM, and more kick @$$ features, don't believe me, go check Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eets Posted April 10, 2002 Share Posted April 10, 2002 Having an Intel Integrated 82810e Video Controller & loving JO... I spit upon you. *patooie* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingDead Posted April 10, 2002 Share Posted April 10, 2002 Originally posted by SNaray8442 to the dude that posted the B.S> meter, he has a chance of not lying, go check out: GamersHQ People ahve systems there that are over clocked to 2.9ghz, pc2700 RAM, and more kick @$$ features, don't believe me, go check I know, Im a onion myself(check the score at the bottom) but those are just too good specs NOT to have a pimp ass monitor I have a ferari but I dont have any seats in it -ya know? and if these specs are yours I want to see your comp benchmarked, run 3d marks from madonion.com and toss me your compare link....... please? 3dm2k1se 8699 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lostman Posted April 10, 2002 Share Posted April 10, 2002 What's wrong with having a Ferrari with no seats? F R A G N A S T I K A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanMO Posted April 11, 2002 Share Posted April 11, 2002 KIng Dead I was wondering. Can you turn your FSB up to 133 instead of 100 on the MOBO. Just wondering if that might get a little more results. Not that your results are bad at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingDead Posted April 12, 2002 Share Posted April 12, 2002 Originally posted by seanMO KIng Dead I was wondering. Can you turn your FSB up to 133 instead of 100 on the MOBO. Just wondering if that might get a little more results. Not that your results are bad at all. judging by your name I would guess your from madonion arnt you? I bet I could but I am not going to mess with my fsb till I get another board/cpu(I think I have the chance to buy a cpu/mobo from intel every year for like $200) and when I do that I am going to push this curent system as faaar as I can just to see what I could get out of it and I dont think my fsb is truely just 100, I have rd.... and I think that 3dmarks reads the fsb difrently(or at least thats what I have been told) in the near future I do want to get a nice water cooling system to throw on my video card(and in the future when I have a new cpu/mobo Ill throw a block on the cpu) and see if I cant get me some better 3dm2k1se scores Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanMO Posted April 12, 2002 Share Posted April 12, 2002 Well the FSB being set to 133 wont hurt your system at all. This is just the speed that it should be running at to take full advantage of your cpu. The 100 speed is to compatible with older CPU. But if your worried(seriously dont) dont bother. I dont know what the exact difference would be , but for people trying to squeeze the absolute most from there systems this is the way to go. If its even being read properly?? By the way you can check it in your bios. and cpu setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.