Guest Darth Maul Jr. Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 I always wondered who would win in a fight between Darth Vader and Darth Maul...they're both cool and got cool powers. Vader seems to have more powers and is probably a more advanced Sith than Maul, but Maul knows a bunch of Kung-Fu moves that would probably give Vader a hard time. The good thing that VAder has going for him is that he managed to nail a Queen! How many guys can brag about that? I dont think Maul ever pulled that off, but then we dont know for sure do we. I decided to make a comparison between VAder and Maul.. ACCOMPLISHMENT DARTH VADER DARTH MAUL * Bagged a Queen Yes No * Kicked a Jedi's ass Yes Yes * Got his ass kicked by a Jedi No Yes * Beat his kids ass Yes No WINNER: DARTH VADER Making this i thought of making a comparison between Ray Park the guy that played Darth Maul (My Hero) and Ray Parker Jr. ACCOMPLISHMENT RAY PARK RAY PARKER JR. * Starred in high grossin Yes No films * Teenagers know who he is Yes No * Adults remeber him Yes No * Cast of Ghostbusters Yes No remember him WINNER: RAY PARK ----
Guest Darth Maul Jr. Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 THAT POST CAME OUT LOOKING GOOFY...SORRY ALL
Paragon_Leon Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 goofy or not, you forgot that Vader got his ass kicked by a Jedi (Luke) as well in RotJ. Now think about whether or not Maul would be better than Luke in that final frantic fight in Jedi; i think he would, so I'd say Maul would win..
Guest Tie Guy Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 It is very hard to fight a double-bladed lightasber bearing sith with only one person. You really need two to prtect each other. So i think Maul would him, especially since he is more agile.
Guest Kvan Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 I think it depends on the age of the person. Maul was at his peak, so if Maul fought OT Vader then Maul would win. But if Maul fought episode 3 Vader...well I don't know who would win since we haven't seen epi.3 Vader fight. I would probably give it to epi. 3 Vader though, since he is the "chosen one".
observer_20000 Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 Ok, Vader was one of the most powerful Sith ever, where as Maul was your average Sith. Vader vs Maul, is like an SSD vs ISD, the SSD would obviously win, as would Vader.
Guest Kvan Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 Originally posted by observer_20000 Ok, Vader was one of the most powerful Sith ever, where as Maul was your average Sith. Vader vs Maul, is like an SSD vs ISD, the SSD would obviously win, as would Vader. Then why did Luke kick Vaders butt? I think it was because he was getting old and being eaten away by the Darkside. Maybe if Vader was at his peak he would win, but he wasn't, so he wouldn't Thats just my take on the battle.
observer_20000 Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 Originally posted by Kvan Then why did Luke kick Vaders butt? I think it was because he was getting old and being eaten away by the Darkside. Maybe if Vader was at his peak he would win, but he wasn't, so he wouldn't Thats just my take on the battle. No, it's because Luke wa Vader's son, and was just as powerful, or at least had as much potential.
observer_20000 Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 Originally posted by Darth_Rommel How old was Vader during the ROTJ battle? Well he was 9 in episode I, and that's about 35 years before ep 6, so he was about 44.
Darth_Rommel Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 He's not as old as I thought he would be... p.s. Thanks for the info observer
Guest Master Yoda Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 Dont forget that Vader wasnt trying to kill Luke he was trying to turn him to the Dark Side. So I think that Maul at his peak VS Vader at his peak = Vader Winnner
Guest Boba Rhett Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 Everyone of you saying Vader wouldn't whipe the floor with Maul is forgetting that Vader did kinda hunt down and kill pretty much all the Jedi in the Universe...... Maul wouldn't stand a chance.
Darth_Rommel Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 Yeah... Maul may be athletic, and quicker, and more agile... but he doesn't have the control of the force Vader does = winner!
Guest Master Yoda Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 Ya, Maul couldnt even take out an Jedi who was getting old and slow and a young not fully trained Jedi.
Guest Tie Guy Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 Actually, he did defeat Qui-Gon, and he defeated Obi-Wan too. Then he just got careless and didn't go ahead and kill obi-wan and he payed the price.
Guest Boba Rhett Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 So..... he defeated him yet he was killed. Interesting point of veiw. Obi defeated Maul.
Paragon_Leon Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 well, that's also from a certain point of view. first of all, remember Obi saying: 'You can't win' ? Then he ALLOWED Vader to strike him. Hardly a defeat in my book.
Guest Master Yoda Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 I agree, But Maul(at his peak) still would not have been able to beat Vader when he was at his peak. Did Maul kill nearly all of the Jedi? No. But Vader was able to.
Darth_Rommel Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 But even if he had kept fighting, Vader would have defeated him eventually... Obi was alot older p.s. It is by my book , What book do you read anyways Leon?
observer_20000 Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 Originally posted by Paragon_Leon well, that's also from a certain point of view. first of all, remember Obi saying: 'You can't win' ? Then he ALLOWED Vader to strike him. Hardly a defeat in my book. Is he forgetting that Vader is the one that killed about 99.9% of the Jedi, all by himself, I doubt Maul would be capable of that task.
Guest Tie Guy Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 yes, people have said that.....repeatedly. Anyways, Vader didn't do it all by himslef. They had alot of Dark Jedi and of course the Emperor.
Guest Master Yoda Posted August 20, 2001 Posted August 20, 2001 If they had alot of Dark Jedi then how come you only see Vader and the Emperor in the movies and not any other Dark Jedi?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.