Natty Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 *gasps* oh no I just noticed that England lost to Brazil and America lost to Germany or someone- this is terrible because...? *blank look* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acrylic Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 Well, no offense, but I really wanted Germany to win. They are my fave team, then Croatia, then USA, then Brazil, then, then....I dunno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COJ Posted June 22, 2002 Author Share Posted June 22, 2002 Usa lost?? haha nice I hope Korea goes far, they deserve it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 "OUVIRAM DO IPIRANGA ÀS MÁRGENS PLÁCIDAS DE UM POVO HERÓICO BRADO RETUMBANTE E O SOL DA LIBERDADE EM RAIOS FÚLGIDOS BRILHOU NO CÉU DA PÁTRIA NESSE INSTANTE SE O PENHOR DESSA IGUALDADE CONSEGUIMOS CONQUISTAR DE BRAÇO FORTE EM TEU SEIO, Ó LIBERDADE DESAFIA O NOSSO PEITO A PRÓPRIA MORTE O PÁTRIA AMADA IDOLATRADA SALVE SALVE BRASIL UM SOLHO INTENSO UM RAIO VÍVIDO DE AMOR E DE ESPERANÇA A TERRA DESCE SE EM TEU FORMOSO CÉU RISONHO E LÍMPIDO A IMAGEM DO CRUZEIRO RESPLANDESCE GIGANTE PELA PRÓPRIA NATUREZA ÉS BELO, ÉS FORTE IMPÁVIDO COLOSSO E O TEU FUTURO ESPELHA ESSA GRANDEZA TERRA ADORADA, ENTRE OUTRAS MIL ÉS TU BRASIL, Ó PÁTRIA AMADA DOS FILHOS DESTE SOLO ÉS MÃE GENTIL PÁTRIA AMADA, BRASIL!!!!!!" YEAH! BRAZIL WON!!! i woke today 3o clock in the morning to watch that game, but must ppl ddnt even sleep. that was one of the most awsome games in the WC, i must say! No crappy referees, no Ricardo Teixeira, just a simple fair and awsome game. too bad Ronaldinho Gaúcho got that red card, he had done such a beatiful goal. Did u guys see englands goal? As I said, Lúcio was englands 12th man, he gave Owen the easiest goal in his carrear. im pretty sure u all laughed when u saw Lúcio doing... erm... wot he did, but after he helped Owen, he started to get afraid of the ball, and passed it quickly always, exactly wot all 190 million brazilians were telling him to do since the beggining of the WC. for that matter i say that was Lúcio's best game. PS- i think italy and mexico paid to that ****ty game (Italy x Mexico, when it came 1-1, both teams stopped playing football, and started sleeping): they had to go home earlier. That came reminded me of Switzerland and Germany some WCs ago, when they arranged the game b4 to Switzerland win 1-0 against germany so them both would classifie instead of germany and nigeria (by that time, nigeria was the first african team in the world cup). Or in 78, when the Argentinian dictator, not wanting to be overthrowned, paid the Paraguaian team to lose 5-0 against argetina, so they would win the cup and the argentinians would get much calmer. I HATE WHEN THAT HAPPENS! Originally posted by Griswold Usa lost?? haha nice I hope Korea goes far, they deserve it I liked japan better than korea... OBS- SORRY BOUT THIS LONG POST, ITS JUST THAT IM TOO EXCITED!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feral Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 Best game of the torunament? What are you on? Didn't you see ENgland-Argentina, Turkey-Brazil, or Ireland-Spain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 Originally posted by The Feral Chicken Best game of the torunament? What are you on? Didn't you see ENgland-Argentina, Turkey-Brazil, or Ireland-Spain? well, i ddnt say it was THE best game, i said one of the best games. btw, turkey-brasil wasnt taht good, neither was ireland-spain (it was a aprehensive game because both teams were playing badly, not well, like an awsome game) france-denmark was nice... so was portugal-corea, argentina-england, spain-paraguai (actually i liked that game just because Chillaver did an awfull game and took 2 easily catchable goals. PS-I HATE CHILLAVER, he is snob, a prick, AND an old wanna-be-good thinks-he's-god goalkeeper) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WyldStyle Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 It's a shame ENGLAND went out today. Ok we didnt play that well,but that prick Rivaldo should take up acting full time after the performances he has done in this tournament. I admit the team seemed to give up in the second half,even though the samba boys were down to 10 men(maybe we should have dived more too!)but all in all it was a good result for svens men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 Originally posted by WyldStyle It's a shame ENGLAND went out today. Ok we didnt play that well,but that prick Rivaldo should take up acting full time after the performances he has done in this tournament. hahahaha LOL! Originally posted by WyldStyle admit the team seemed to give up in the second half,even though the samba boys were down to 10 men(maybe we should have dived more too!)but all in all it was a good result for svens men. looks like our samba boys scared the shvit out of your englishmen even with one down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Droidekas Posted June 22, 2002 Share Posted June 22, 2002 Originally posted by Al-back from the BigWhoop [bPS- i think italy and mexico paid to that ****ty game (Italy x Mexico, when it came 1-1, both teams stopped playing football, and started sleeping): they had to go home earlier. That came reminded me of Switzerland and Germany some WCs ago, when they arranged the game b4 to Switzerland win 1-0 against germany so them both would classifie instead of germany and nigeria (by that time, nigeria was the first african team in the world cup). Or in 78, when the Argentinian dictator, not wanting to be overthrowned, paid the Paraguaian team to lose 5-0 against argetina, so they would win the cup and the argentinians would get much calmer. I HATE WHEN THAT HAPPENS![/b] I think you don't know what you are talking about. Both Italy and Mexico where qualified because croatia lost against ecuador! It didn't matter if either one or the other won! Go look at http://www.fifa.com,. And if Croatia would have won against ecuador, then both teams had to win to move to 1/8ths! What you are saying doesn't make sense and shows your ignorance in football. And it has nothing to do with the 78 scandal in anycase! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted June 23, 2002 Share Posted June 23, 2002 first of all, **** you second of all: all i said is that mexico and italy played a ****ty game, if u didnt see it, shut the fuçk up! thrid: if croatia had won scoring less than 3 goals, only ITALY would have to win to go through. if u dont understand **** about WCs, shut the fûck up! fourth: i didnt say it had anything to do with the 78 scandle, i said it reminded me of the scandle. if u r illiterate, shut the **** up! fifth: WTF is this sudden attack on me? ignorant on football?! u dont even know me! and i bet u dont even know how many base rules football have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken_Sailor Posted June 23, 2002 Share Posted June 23, 2002 Senegal are out:(!I don't think Turkey deserved to win! And Spain were unlucky, that's all I can say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Droidekas Posted June 23, 2002 Share Posted June 23, 2002 Originally posted by The Feral Chicken Oh, yeah, it's all a conspiracy... Hahaha, Even the Fifa Admits huge errors that will be investigated! Portugal, Italy and Spain thrown out of the WC because of the judges! Newspaper titles all over theworld! Corea is still going thanks to the referees! AL-BACK explain to me then the point of your post!?!? And you don't know me either so don't doubt my knowledge àsshòle. The final, it has been decided months ago! Brasil against Corea of course. We will se if they can steal another one against Germany! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natty Posted June 23, 2002 Share Posted June 23, 2002 I've never heard of the countries Brasil and Coria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feral Posted June 24, 2002 Share Posted June 24, 2002 Oh, shut up. That's as ridiculous as saying England paid the Russian linesman in 66. When they say "errors that will be investigated", they mean refereeing errors. Headlines? What headlines? Have you been smoking something? ARE YOU A POTHEAD, DROIDEKAS? Someone ban this chump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Droidekas Posted June 24, 2002 Share Posted June 24, 2002 You make me laugh Feral, I think you are an Idiot. And I can't be banned for saying what I think, never heard of freedom of speech? 1st amendment? Ignorant. And I think I have been even polite considering the amount of names I have received. You evidently don't read sport news, maybe I exagerated stating headlines. But the way the WC has been going HAS been a cause of concern almost from the start for sport journalists worldwide. Errors made that would cause shock even in kindergarten clubs! Even Blatter said some relatively "strong" stuff (and he is FIFA president, in case you don't know). Now, you can go back and live in your happy little world, but in case you didn't realize yet, corruption exists all over everything! So explain to me the reasons why it can't be present in a multi billion dollars event like the WC????????????????? (and it happened in the past) I think this is the worst WC ever, and that there are some suspicious facts that have occured. And I have seen court cases opened for less than what has happened. But don't worry I will leave this forum, and let you live in your perfect world. I have said what I think, we will see how it develops. (I could even be wrong! But the fact that you don't even consider the options, is just so sad). FOr the other brasilian dude. I think Brasil played like ****, especialy against Turkey. I loved that penalty! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken_Sailor Posted June 24, 2002 Share Posted June 24, 2002 Originally posted by Al-back from the BigWhoop interesting info - In this world cup, Brazil has only played against teams with red shirts: Turkey, China, Costa Rica, Belgium, and now England! England played in white shirts..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feral Posted June 25, 2002 Share Posted June 25, 2002 The team wanted to play in red, but Sven didn't want Brazil to be playing in yellow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted June 25, 2002 Share Posted June 25, 2002 Droidekas, u have said so much **** that i dont know where to start. FIRST OF ALL, LEMME GET THIS CLEAR: THE POINT OF ALL MY POSTS IS TO CHAT. IF U DONT LIKE THAT, SIT ON THE FLOOR AND START CRYING. And you don't know me either so don't doubt my knowledge àsshòle. [rubbing in face]see how nice it is when our knowlegde is put on doubt [/] PS- u replyied exactly how i hoped u would. Thanx for making my comebacks easier PPS- u dont have to write hóle, hole is not a banned word. im not gonna say it FIFA didnt decided BrazilxKorea in the final, but i am gonna question your sources. trust me, btw, u HAVENT been polite. lemme remind u that u were the first person to start calling others IGNORANT, and for taht u have my vote to b banned. i hope other ppl agree with me and feral, [sarcastic]but being banned wont b a prob to u will it? i mean, we r all ignorant[/] and finally, i must remind u to read carefull wot ppl write, cause u ddnt get ONE right. i said i liked the game Brasil x England, not Brazil X Turkey. dont commit those errors again, it annoys me. drunken - yeah, but they do play in red... damn drunken, i was so happy, do u have to throw reality in my face btw- spain was not unlucky, they were stolen. feral - funny, we were told in Brasil that england didnt want to play in red... some1 is lying, and i hope its not Brazil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feral Posted June 25, 2002 Share Posted June 25, 2002 No, you misunderstand. "Sven" refers to Sven Goran Eriksson, England's manager. The England players wanted to play in red. If England had played in red, Brazil would have played in yellow. Sven didn't want Brazil to play in yellow, so he decided we should play in white so you'd have to play in blue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COJ Posted June 25, 2002 Author Share Posted June 25, 2002 does it really matter whats the color of jersey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted June 26, 2002 Share Posted June 26, 2002 oh, yeah. sorry, i should read ur post more carefully... nah anyways, y ddnt he want us to play in yellow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feral Posted June 26, 2002 Share Posted June 26, 2002 I don't think he wanted you in your usual kit in case it gave you an advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken_Sailor Posted June 26, 2002 Share Posted June 26, 2002 He usually thinks on everything! Between,Germany in the final! They didn't play that well....but Korea made several mistakes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fender Posted June 26, 2002 Share Posted June 26, 2002 it's been over 55 years, but I still bear a grudge against Germany.... Brazil, you go out there and kick some ass! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted June 26, 2002 Share Posted June 26, 2002 brazil and germany are the teams with most WC in the bag, but they have never played against each other in a WC match. (well, since brazil is not playing against some1 who has a red shirt, i gotta find a new tabu ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.