My complaint with Kman

["thA dekMan"]

As they look over the world's painful panorama of war and terror, some people conclude that it is too late, that no amount of information or activity could possibly contribute to the intellectual and spiritual health of the body politic. But those who take that pessimistic view understand neither Kman nor his current rung on the ladder to total power. What follows is a series of remarks addressed to the readers of this letter and to Kman himself. Following this line of logic, it would appear that it's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. He distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain his current opinions. As is often the case, if you've read any of the hotheaded slop that he has concocted, you'll unmistakably recall his description of his plan to spam the Internet with unsolicited malicious e-mail. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that we must unequivocally uplift individuals and communities on a global scale to perform noble deeds. Does that sound extremist? Is it too lackadaisical for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life.

 

What conclusion should we draw from Kman's insults? How about that some deep void within Kman makes it necessary for him to perpetuate misguided and questionable notions of other blockish vigilantes' intentions? His expositions don't accomplish anything useful, because they don't deal with the real issue. The real issue is that I must ask that his secret agents fight scurrility and slander. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to put political correctness ahead of scientific rigor.

 

I might be able to forgive him, but only if he promises never again to detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity -- family, class, private associations. It would be nice to say that incorrigible absenteeism doesn't exist anymore, but we all know that it does. Okay, now it's time to offend a few people. Actually, I hope not to offend anyone, although Kman possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition," much less achieve it.

 

I'll repeat what I've already said: This is not the first time I've wanted to cast a gimlet eye on his politics. But it is the first time I realized that if he thinks that it's okay for him to indulge his every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole, then he's sadly mistaken. There is something inherently wrong with a man who wants, more than anything else, to treat traditional values as if they were blathering, discourteous crimes. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: Out of all of the ugly, unscrupulous bigamists I've ever known, he is clearly the most impertinent. There is good reason to believe that if Kman succeeds in his attempt to make a fetish of the virtues of foul gangsterism, it'll have to be over my dead body.

 

His intimates portray themselves as fervent believers in freedom of speech and expression, but are loath to reveal that Kman is unable to use the English language effectively or correctly. But you knew that already. So let me add that there are some simple truths in this world. First, Kman is a fearful man hiding behind a facade of cool. Second, Kman knows perfectly well that I am chagrined but resigned when I witness the indifference to the fundamentals of language that he displays. And finally, it may be helpful to take a step back and evaluate the tactics he has used against me. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: He uses the word "intercommunicability" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated. Kman's double standards are a veritable dictionary and synonymicon of totalitarianism. This is the flaw in Kman's dissertations. He doesn't understand that in these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, I honestly dislike Kman. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that the last time I told Kman's apologists that I want to guide the world into an age of peace, justice, and solidarity, they declared in response, "But Kman's plans for the future are not worth getting outraged about." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. To recap the main points made in this letter: 1) Kman's jeremiads have earned him opprobrium, suspicion, resentment, and hatred, 2) letting him exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation is a recipe for disaster, and 3) he makes it his job to pander to our worst fears.

 

And if he wish to reply, he'd better go here first!

[Ewok Hunter]

no idea what you just said but it appears that

'dem ar fighting words

[XERXES]

cliff notes?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

heh jk