GarfieldJL Posted November 6, 2008 Author Share Posted November 6, 2008 Yep, he said that. That he was unable to reach "an agreement with the Republican nominee" does not mean that he lied, broke his promise, went back on his word, changed his mind, etc, etc, etc. Last I checked McCain was "locked" into public financing, and bear in mind I'm going off of ABC which is one of the news outlets that was in the tank for the Dems. I still have a few hundred thousand links to go through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Achilles Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 Go through as many links as you would like. It won't change the meaning of the words. Your argument was that Obama committed to public financing. Those of us that followed the campaign pointed out that this wasn't what he said. Now that you yourself have quoted a source that confirms what we've been saying all along, I don't know what you hope to gain by continuing the debate the point (especially now that the campaign is over). @random: Wasn't there an amended rule about repeating arguments that don't move the conversation forward? Because the rule is vague, I'm having difficulty determining whether a member of the staff should be applying it here or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jae Onasi Posted November 6, 2008 Share Posted November 6, 2008 Yep, I think this thread has run its course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.