darthfergie Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 Yea it is kind of anoying when an unknowing harvester comes along right when you send your spys in to take their resources. That always happened to me when I first got the game.
Guest T.I.E Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 All carnage blood thirsty lust for the game aside, I for one am thankfull someone is staying true to the saga. Very rarely in the movies was there blood and gore....I think the arm loped off and luke getting a boo boo on cloud city oh yeah and the wampa dude tossing luke like a rag doll, but hey it beats the garbage being created today. I think if you want blood play Quake or something but hey I want my Star Wars like I remember playing with the action figures in the 80's......woooooohoooooo!!!!!!
Guest Kvan Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 Originally posted by T.I.E All carnage blood thirsty lust for the game aside, I for one am thankfull someone is staying true to the saga. Very rarely in the movies was there blood and gore....I think the arm loped off and luke getting a boo boo on cloud city oh yeah and the wampa dude tossing luke like a rag doll, but hey it beats the garbage being created today. I think if you want blood play Quake or something but hey I want my Star Wars like I remember playing with the action figures in the 80's......woooooohoooooo!!!!!! Don't forget the crispy Aunt and Uncle!
Guest T.I.E Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 Oh yeah thanks Kvan.....I forgot that one.......I think thats gore but more along the lines of a high school biology lab skeleton or something.
darthfergie Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 This is kind of off the subject but that reminds me. Have any of you seen TROOPS. If you havn't your really missing out. Take this link if you haven't seen it. http://www.theforce.net/theater/shortfilms/troops/ It is a must see fanfilm.
Guest Kvan Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 Originally posted by T.I.E Oh yeah thanks Kvan.....I forgot that one.......I think thats gore but more along the lines of a high school biology lab skeleton or something. You must have had some school! Personally, I think if they put that gore into it why not have units be able to crush other units? It's realistic. People got stepped on by ATAT's before. And getting stepped on usually there is blood.
Darth_Rommel Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 I don't like blood! I don't like corpses either they freak me out! Any one here seen the Mummy? I was really scared of that one, I hated the corpses of the people after the mummy 'sucked out' there insides. I didn't like the Mummy either
Guest T.I.E Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 That would be cool I think but honestly now, would an AT-AT really be able to smush troops who are able to still walk? It is more feasible on tanks and wheeled vehicles that can turn on a dime but the imperial vehicles now way.
Guest Kvan Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 Originally posted by T.I.E That would be cool I think but honestly now, would an AT-AT really be able to smush troops who are able to still walk? It is more feasible on tanks and wheeled vehicles that can turn on a dime but the imperial vehicles now way. ATAT's have smashed troops before. I'm sure the troops are faster then an ATAT so it would rarely happen. To Rommel...Wussy Has anyone played any of the WoD games? They got some real interesting stuff (meaning gross to Rommel)
Guest Tie Guy Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 What does WoD stand for, i've never heard of it. Anyways, you forgot about that tasty piece of tauntaun meat that the Wampa is eating. I don't know if that counts as gore though, it's jsut meat. BTW, anyone ever notice that the guys arm seems hollow when it gets cut off, or at least doesn't have a bone.
Darth_Rommel Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 Originally posted by Kvan ATAT's have smashed troops before. I'm sure the troops are faster then an ATAT so it would rarely happen. AT-AT's have a maximum speed of 40 miles per hour, so troops are way slower. AND I'M NOT A WUSSY!
Guest Kvan Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 Originally posted by Darth_Rommel AT-AT's have a maximum speed of 40 miles per hour, so troops are way slower. AND I'M NOT A WUSSY! Ok, your right an ATAT is faster BUT it doesn't have the manuverablity that troops would have. hehe, wussy WoD = World of Darkness. It's an RPG.
Guest Tie Guy Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 I just gotta clear things up: ATAT's can go 60 kilometers per hour, not forty. (although they could go forty if they wanted to ) No troop can run that fast, so it is very plausible tht they could crush ground units.
Paragon_Leon Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 You can actually see that in ESB. There's a shot where an ATST walks (more: runs) in front of an ATAT. You see that he's about one and a half times as fast, which leaves us with a speed of....90 kms/hours.. or something like that.
Guest Kvan Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 Originally posted by Darth_Rommel How fast can AT-ST's go wise one? In the SW RPG ATAT's max. is 60 km/hr and ATST's max. is 90km/hr
Guest Tie Guy Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 Yes, that is correct. And, just in case he asks what the AT-PT's speed is it is 60 kph, just liek the ATAT.
Guest Kvan Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 Originally posted by Tie Guy Yes, that is correct. And, just in case he asks what the AT-PT's speed is it is 60 kph, just liek the ATAT. Thinking ahead, tie? Thats a first Really though, where did you hear that ATPT's go 60kph?
darthfergie Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 yeah too bad. When I first saw At-Pts (which was about when the Zhan books came out) I thought they were suposed to be better than At- Sts. By the way, I noticed something strang in this screenshot. There is a pre-At-At and a pre At-St. Wierd. http://viewer.ign.com/media_page.jsp?width=800&height=600&media=http://pcmedia.ign.com/media/previews/image/galbat001.jpg&media_type=P&object_id=15959&adtag=network%3Dign%26site%3Dpchub%26adchannel%3Dpc%26pagetype%3Darticle&ign_section=1&media_name=Imperial+oppression
Lord JayVizIon Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 hmm, looking at that pic with just one xwing, the title imperial oppression is an understatement. btw leon, you have pcgamer, did you notice that other smaller at walker? it's on the first page in the hoth battle.......
Paragon_Leon Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 I'm looking at it right now. if i'm not mistaken, that's the AT-PT. it has a transparent cockpit from the looks of it. so in terms of strength, you'd have that as the lowest, then ATST, then ATAT. pretty straight-forward.
Guest Tie Guy Posted August 5, 2001 Posted August 5, 2001 Yeah, they are a All-Terrain Personal Transports, so they are much smaller and weaker than both the ATAT and ATST. Besides, thats how it was in FoCom, i hope they are in GB too. BTW, i get my info from countless nights of reading STar Wars Novels and the Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.