Doodle Dude of Doom Posted December 25, 2002 Share Posted December 25, 2002 Why not vote? It should be democrasy (sory for the damn bad spelling) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guybrush122 Posted December 28, 2002 Share Posted December 28, 2002 I agree with Doodle Head. Democracy, though insanely flawed, is alot better than just picking someone right out of a hat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feral Posted December 28, 2002 Share Posted December 28, 2002 You see? THis is exaclty why I closed the topic. Guys, this isn't like runnning a country. As I siad further up in the topic, the fact that Isak nominated AcrylicGuitar as a mod shows that democracy is not the best way to deal with things in this kind of situation. And I thought I'd made it absolutely clear that this kind of decision isn't up to us, and nor should it be. Christ, why am I even bothering? There's only Neil that's paying attention to my posts anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshi Posted December 29, 2002 Share Posted December 29, 2002 even if this was like running a country, when was the last someone voted for vice-president, they don't, they just get picked by the presidents. i gues we should have a say if we needed a new admin, but i think admin can pick the mods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kjølen Posted December 29, 2002 Share Posted December 29, 2002 Exactly, now why does it matter if we didn't get to vote for Vice President or Mods, if we don't like it, then we tell an admin if the moderator is truely abusing the powers, which would mean, countless times of error and constant disaproval of the members. Which I'd have to say, Feral is doing perfectly fine. Seriously, look at us: A moderaotr does his job, which might involve making a few people a little upset, and look, now we're arguing about how a moderaotr gets picked! People! WHO CARES? Why can't we just get back to a happy little forum eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadmeat_X Posted December 30, 2002 Share Posted December 30, 2002 Originally posted by The Feral Chicken You see? THis is exaclty why I closed the topic. Guys, this isn't like runnning a country. As I siad further up in the topic, the fact that Isak nominated AcrylicGuitar as a mod shows that democracy is not the best way to deal with things in this kind of situation. And I thought I'd made it absolutely clear that this kind of decision isn't up to us, and nor should it be. Christ, why am I even bothering? There's only Neil that's paying attention to my posts anyway. But then again, if we would make it into a poll or something, would AG win? Just cause soemone said "AG' doesn't mean everyone wants him as mod. It's democracy. Everyone votes for his favourite, and the one with the most votes wins. If someone doesn't behave right, there won't be much votes for him and he won't win. It's as easy as that. Just start anothere poll about who should replace NiKo. It is, believe it or not Ferla, the best way. BTW My vote is on Al-BFTBW or Brighteyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feral Posted December 30, 2002 Share Posted December 30, 2002 See, you nominated Al and Brighteyes. Al is a spammer. A nice guy, and he doesn't doit intentionally, but definetely not mod material. Brighteyes is barely ever here. Why don't we just make Monkey_Girl a moderator? What I'm getting at is, even if you like that person, they might not make very good moderators. And besides, the decision is not ours to make. It's the admins who decide. You can't force them to make someone an admin. Once again, I'm closing the thread. It's absolutely pointles, and there are still a lot of you that fail to accept the truth just because you don't like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.