murta Posted February 5, 2003 Share Posted February 5, 2003 Yes, the innocence of childHOOD, something he never experienced since he was beaten by his dad and picked on by many people. Oh and he never said anywhere thathe'd kill himself if he couldn't be close to children. He said if all children had gone from the world he'd jump off a cliff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benihana14 Posted February 5, 2003 Share Posted February 5, 2003 All I have to say, is I wish I could dance like him... You guys wanna see freaky? Watch "Hedwig and the Angry Inch"......good cinematography....but freaky! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brighteyes Posted February 5, 2003 Share Posted February 5, 2003 I can see his point of view. The only reason we think of it as him being a pedofile is because there are some extremely disturbed twats out there. But then you should'nt go around flaunting the fact like he did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scabb Posted February 5, 2003 Share Posted February 5, 2003 Okay, Micheal Jackson could have easily featured in Tim Burton' Planet of the Apes without make up, but he can't blame that on his father taunting him. His father taunted the rest of his sons too, and they turned out fine. I agree that he may have dipped his face in wax because the adoring public wanted him perfect, but it's his mistake to deal with himself, and to place the blame on upbringing is all too fashionable nowadays - he never mentioned it before - although I'm not disputing that your parents or guardians are probably the biggest factor on how you yourself turn out. And two nosejobs? Please. He didn't develop patches of white on his skin like most sufferers of the disease he was supposed to have do, he basically transformed from black to white overnight. As for all the paedophilia hysteria - please. I agree with Lemonhead on this issue, it's nothing but The Sun playing with the words, spinning them round until they're confused and dizzy, and printing them in bold block capitals, alongside an extremely delicious pun. Nothing that comes out of the Sun should be taken for reality, especially the pictures on page 3. And big deal! He calls his daughter "Blanket" or whatever. Quite a lot of children have stupid nicknames. All of this may seem unacceptable to everyone out there who's trying to be politically correct, but there are things that are a lot worse than this in the world, they just aren't interesting enough to get the readers of the Sun excited. You shouldn't just accept that something is wrong because someone says it is, you should make up your own mind. It seems normal that Jacko would want a childhood, as he missed out on his. This could be why he makes friends with children, as they don't try to push him around like all his bodyguards and Public Relations managers etc, and they're not old enough to have experienced the whole 'Lets go crazy and scream at Micheal Jackson' fad. Ask the children who slept in his bed what they think of him before you accuse him of being a raging boy-hungry paedophile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemon Head Posted February 5, 2003 Share Posted February 5, 2003 hear hear! I can't think of anything else that needs to be added to the above post as it covers all the points of my argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HelenW Posted February 5, 2003 Share Posted February 5, 2003 Those of us in england are all too aware of the dangers of the sun and the news of the world and the hysteria they generated about paedophiles. For those that don't know, the news of the world (sunday version of the sun) had a name and shame campaign for known child sex offenders, as they believed everyone had the right to know if a paedophile was living in their street. All very well in theory, but this campaign saw vigilantes burning houses, trashing cars and beating people up. Some poor guy got his name on the list for being a paediatrician!!!! The guy was a doctor, but he was attacked because he had the prefix paed in his job title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemon Head Posted February 5, 2003 Share Posted February 5, 2003 Originally posted by HelenW Some poor guy got his name on the list for being a paediatrician!!!! The guy was a doctor, but he was attacked because he had the prefix paed in his job title. That was the particular occasion I had in mind when posting about the paedophile hysteria. It's stupid and dangerous, you'll have someone's eye out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natty Posted February 6, 2003 Author Share Posted February 6, 2003 He's still a chronic lier though. One min he said Prince Michael2 was conveived with an ex girlfriend (probably money Hungry Debbie Ho- I mean Row) and then the next he was saying he was conceived via artificial innsemination with a woman he never met. Even with all the other stuff my main concern is for his children Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.