If you get a double-bladed lighsaber will you be able to have just one end on?

[Wesia Daoke]

You know how Darth Maul fights Jynn on Tattonie but only used one side of his lightsaber. Will u be able to do that?

[Dark Dragon]

Yo

 

Good question, i really hope so, but it wouldn't suprise me either way.

 

:jango:English Guy:jango:

[jedi3112]

I'm pretty sure the devs already said this won't be possible, just as the tatoos. Please don't make two topics next time but put your two questions together in one topic.

[Jedi Apprentice]

Last thing I heard was that you couldn't ignite just one side.

 

Just use one saber if you want to do that, what would really be the difference?

 

Igniting one side then another right after would make you feel pretty bad though.

 

But I don't really care if they do or don't and it looks like they aren't. Especially since the devs said they weren't.

[Burrie]

Igniting one side then another right after would make you feel pretty bad though.

 

Agreed. that would've been a very nice feature. Seeing as how you probably CAN change between wielding one saber, and half-way through start attacking with a second, I'm definately gonna try and surprise(even though it prolly won't be scripted or anythin') Darth Malak that way. I think that we'll get to duel Malak before the final battle, and be utterly humiliated by him... if I'm wielding one blade at that time, my plan just might work.

 

Just think of it : First Malak manages to defeat me easily with one blade. Then I have a rematch with him, and I'm perfectly capable of holding out on my own with one blade... and suddenly, I grab my second saber and activate it. I'd definately would like to see the look on his face when that happens

[Jedi Apprentice]

I definitely see your point, Burrie.

 

It would be a nice little mixer and you could always change quickly to confuse your enemies.

 

Though I think with how the inventory is it will allow you to make changes extremely quick so you can almost do it anyways.

[tFighterPilot]

Darth Maul fights Jynn on Tattonie

First of all, it's Jin second of all it's tatooine third of all, it was in naboo.

 

Anyways, why would you want to use just one end?

[Burrie]

First of all, it's Jin second of all it's tatooine third of all, it was in naboo.

 

Am I the only one who sees a contradiction in those last two statements?

 

Anyways, why would you want to use just one end?

For dramatic purposes? Perhaps to avoid penalties that you might receive when wielding a double-bladed saber? To look cool or surprise your opponent when you suddenly activate your second blade? There are numerous reasons.

[tFighterPilot]

Am I the only one who sees a contradiction in those last two statements?

You know what I meant...

 

I meant that you wrote Tatooine worng and that the battle was in Naboo

[jedi3112]

To be precise it's Jinn, not Jin and there was a fight on Tatooine, where Maul had one side ignited, it was just before they took off. Jinn fought him twice remember.

[Wesia Daoke]

Originally posted by jedi3112

To be precise it's Jinn, not Jin and there was a fight on Tatooine, where Maul had one side ignited, it was just before they took off. Jinn fought him twice remember.

 

Thank you jediprobe for clearing that up.

[Hannibal]

Question was answered and arguments are going so...