Ramen

Thanks for your response! Beautiful map <3

I hope this is not too off topic, but can I ask what scanner you use and/or would recommend for scanning artwork and posters at home if you could choose?

1. I'm not a dude. 2. No one forced you to 'explain' or respond to anything (like you stated before you edited your post for the gazillionth time, like you do with every post, let us know when you are done next time). 3. Like I said, I'm out. Please let it go. You're acting completely nuts.

This is your statement to me. This is what I responded to. There is a button you can click to send an access request to the creator of a google form if they use the wrong link, like shown several times. So obviously there is A way to request access through the click of a single button. I never said the button on the google form was what was shown, I in fact have done the complete opposite the whole time. I'm not sure why you are so aggressive, or accuse me of ´trolling´, because from my side, you are acting completely bonkers. You do not seem like a very nice person. And I know perfectly well how a google doc functions. The whole point is that you were able to request access through a blue button, which I have stated the whole time. Why you keep insisting on grinding on about this is beyond my comprehension, but it feels like you are dead set on just being rude and mean and try to make me out to be some kind of it idiot. Knock yourself out. Have your little victory dance. I'm out.

This is your statement to me. This is the button you can click to send an access request to the creator of a google form if they use the wrong link. I agree that it's not worth talking about anymore, and that it is possible to send an access request with both a form using the wrong link and a google doc through the click of a button, notifying the creator. So I am unsure why you keep replying. 🤷‍♂️

Which would allow you to send an access request to the person who made the form. And this was the button on the page in question. And your screenshot is from a random website. So it was probably a goggle doc. and not a form.

How To Remove Request Edit Access Button On A Google Form If your users are seeing the request edit access button on your form, it is likely that you are sharing the incorrect link. When creating the form, if you just copy the link from your URL bar the copy of the form that your users will see will contain the request edit access button. If you want to share it without the request edit access button you need to use the “Send” button or add /viewform the end of your link.

Then this document was a regular Google Drive document, because it had a big, fat 'Request access' button when you tried to access it, and that screenshot is not a screenshot of the page in question. It looked like this: PS. It is seemingly possible to create this scenario with a google form as well, by sending out the wrong link to a public form (copying it directly from the address bar): How To Remove Request Edit Access Button On A Google Form If your users are seeing the request edit access button on your form, it is likely that you are sharing the incorrect link. When creating the form, if you just copy the link from your URL bar the copy of the form that your users will see will contain the request edit access button. If you want to share it without the request edit access button you need to use the “Send” button or add /viewform the end of your link.

Why not share the art files, like Laserschwert has done with his work? That way, anyone who would like to make their own box could just do it themselves.

The google form is accessible, you have to request access from the owner is all, nothing wrong with that. What a totally uncool thing to do with the hard work of somebody else.

Sure, I think the music sounds great, and I hope the writing is still as good as it used to be! I don't respond to commands though, so I will just wish you a nice Friday as well

A lot of people do agree. The part after that was added by you. I think a discussion of semantic truth vs. scientific fact is a digression, and a bit besides the point. I am simply saying what I think, as everyone else. The word fan is derived from fanatic. It's not so much your tone, but what you actually write, and the words you chose to do so. It seems you are trying to start a fight, while at the same time putting a lot of words in my mouth and telling me what I should do and think, but I am not really interested in one I hope you enjoy the rest of your Friday!

Well, to be fair, you did crop out my next sentence, which was "I don't know." And the sentiment that it was simply not a good movie was shared by many others. Even the main actors admitted they did not understand it. And it does not disqualify the two former options, it is still entirely possible they are the reason. You are making a whole lot of assumptions about what I think, that I have not even said anything about. I don't feel like anyone has failed me personally, I have said what I think, like everyone else does. You obviously do not agree with me, and that is fine, but I think it's a bit rude to use words like miserable, bitter and spiteful, and screaming, entitled child. If anything, that is how your message comes across to me, without me feeling a need to use that kind of language. I don't think I have acted like that, so I don't really think you are reacting the same way as me. I'm also here because I'm interested in (and love) Monkey Island. That doesn't mean any critical thought is not allowed. That seems a bit intolerant, honestly. I haven't said you should change your mind, but it does seem that you think you can and should tell me what to do. Feel free to not respond, that is everyones right, of course

I'm sorry, I'm not sure i understand what you mean? ??

This reminds me of when Tenet came out. I'm a huge fan of Christopher Nolan movies (The Prestige, The Dark Knight, Inception and Interstellar are some of my all time favourites), so when I first heard about Tenet, I was ecstatic. I waited in painful anticipation, and since it came out in theatres during the pandemic, and he hadn't made anything like those movies since 2014, I was overjoyed. I remember the feeling I had after coming out of the theatre (after 3(!) hours). I felt confused and cheated, like someone had tricked me, at the same time. At first I thought that maybe it was just so great and complex that I didn't get it. But as days passed, and I discussed it with other people I knew that had seen it, I realised that my initial reaction was correct. It was just bad. Maybe he lost it, maybe he grew too old, like many people do. I don't know. But I think the people in other forums are just voicing their truthful opinion, where they won't be attacked for it. I can't see why anyone would go out of their way to find something negative to criticise, because at the end of the day, I think those people have also been waiting for years to experience something as great as their earlier experiences again, too. It also reminds me of a Stephen Fry quote; “It's now very common to hear people say, 'I'm rather offended by that.' As if that gives them certain rights. It's actually nothing more... than a whine. 'I find that offensive.' It has no meaning; it has no purpose; it has no reason to be respected as a phrase. 'I am offended by that.' Well, so fucking what." [I saw hate in a graveyard -- Stephen Fry, The Guardian, 5 June 2005]”

Yes, I do agree! And as you can see, I do engage with it, I am not the one unwilling to talk about it That doesn't mean I agree it is technically or stylistically good. Are you Dan Lee, btw? The header image reminds me of his work. Kudos on it!

I didn't call them facts, I said they were true. Which they are to most people I know, and according to the internet, a whole lot of people I don't know as well. And I said compared to MI2 and MI3, not compared to the special editions. But if you feel the need to twist words to put others down, feel free. Is what you are doing art criticism? Is it you who defines what that is? I have a bachelors in art history, and also know a lot (too many) artists. I don't pretend to hold some kind of higher standard because of it, but I am used to engage in discourse over technique and style. Something I can tell the people in this forum is not. I'm not wounded anyone refuses to engage with me, I'm just pointing out that you are chasing away anyone who disagrees with your rose tinted view of what this is, and then parading around thinking you have changed peoples mind. Which you haven't. They just don't engage with you anymore, because you are gatekeeping and being aggressive towards them. And I did not miss your sarcasm. I just don't engage with passive aggressiveness in the same manner you opt to do when my world view is challenged.

Thanks for the concern, I'm just enjoying my spritzer in the sun, watching the beautiful people passe me by I'm not really interested in your article, but the art on the header image is great! Wish they had done something like that for ReMI!

Still doesn't change the fact that they are true. But you are welcome to make any counterarguments, since you invited an edifying discussion.

I'm glad to see you are open to discussion. I disagree. Looks like a jumbled mess to me. Compared to the hand drawn art of Peter Chan and Bill Tiller in MI2 and MI3, it’s not much better than the horrible special editions they put out. Anyone who has even visited an art class knows that you can critique technique and style in a debate, without depending entirely on your feelings and subjective experience. Guybrushes nose looks like a penis, he has a bobble head, animation looks like cutout puppets with limbs pivoting around the joints, colors are grossly oversaturated, backgrounds look like a mess and have several focal points making it hard to discern characters and points of interest, characters have black soulless pinpoint eyes and generally look like they are lifted from an abstract painting or childrens iPad novel. Kinda reminds me of Hamlet, except that looked better and had technically better art direction.

Thanks for proving my point. I'm not a boy, btw.

It's It's not so much that people are getting used to it, as they are tired of getting attacked by fanatics. The art/animation still looks awful and cheap.