keshire Posted May 20, 2004 Author Posted May 20, 2004 It was mentioned in his thread, but I believe he ignored me.
t3rr0r Posted May 21, 2004 Posted May 21, 2004 Originally posted by keshire It was mentioned in his thread, but I believe he ignored me. i'm sure had he been the one weighting his model he would have considered.
HapSlash Posted May 27, 2004 Posted May 27, 2004 Originally posted by keshire It was mentioned in his thread, but I believe he ignored me. Sorry if you felt ignored, but by the time you posted I had already started submitting the JO versions, and had finally received the JA glm's back from the guy who had been weighting the model. It was hard enough trying to get him to make the corrections I had originally asked for, so I felt that any other additions at this time would delay the model yet again. I have been thinking about releasing an updated version of the model with the holstered weapon tags, and other various fixes, but I'm still waiting on the Imperial Officer,...
keshire Posted May 27, 2004 Author Posted May 27, 2004 Ah, if thats the case then no problem and no hurt feelings. I'm usually not one thats ignored so I knew something was up. So I didn't push the issue.
ZBomber Posted May 27, 2004 Posted May 27, 2004 Now, if we wanna use this, Should we request in this thread? I ask because the OJP site said read "Using our Work" section, but I couldn't find it BTW, Its looking REALLY good.
razorace Posted May 27, 2004 Posted May 27, 2004 The Using our Work section is in the readme. I beleive that has been posted on the website.
keshire Posted May 28, 2004 Author Posted May 28, 2004 Well Strangely You really don't need to give credit for adding the tags. If you pull them straight out of the example tools you may say so. But otherwise I'd just list that the model is OJP compatible somewhere in your readme.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.