Crazy_dog no.3 Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 Originally posted by --ZeeMan-- but i'm going to go out on a limb here Peter Jackson is the FIRST director i know that has made A SEQUEL[/b] better than the original AND HE DID IT TWICE so that's why i think RotK is the best one. [/b] James Cameron's done it twice too (Terminator 2, Aliens) and Godfather Part II (Francis Ford Coppola) is superior to Godfather (Also Francis Ford Coppola). The Good, the Bad and the Ugly is better than the other two "man with no name" films (Sergio Leone). OK, I'll shut up now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
narfblat Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 Some people complain that the ending for rotk was too long, but its short when you consider it the ending of a 9+ hour movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rccar328 Posted April 2, 2004 Share Posted April 2, 2004 Some people complain that the ending for rotk was too long, but its short when you consider it the ending of a 9+ hour movie. Not me. My complaint was that the ending of ROTK was much, much, much, much, much too short...they cut too much out that was in the book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
narfblat Posted April 3, 2004 Share Posted April 3, 2004 Maybe they'll include that stuff in the extended edition, which will probably come out in November 2004. I hear it'll add an hour and 5 minutes of footage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arán Posted April 6, 2004 Share Posted April 6, 2004 All the movies where great but ROTK was a tiny bit better. The most touching thing in the movie was Sam. Sam was so loyal even when Frodo left him he went after him again. He carried him gave him his food.... Sam is the most loyal hobbit of all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.