TK-425 Posted December 9, 2004 Posted December 9, 2004 You know now that I think about it, it could have been a 17 MB card. Sorry my mistake:)(Still pretty good for a 17 MB card though) /edit: No, it was a 7 MB voodoo. I needed a 16 MB card to play a game back then. And I couldnt play it till I got my 32 MB radeon. So yeah, they did have 7 MB cards back in 1999.
teff Posted December 11, 2004 Author Posted December 11, 2004 Originally posted by TK42235 You know now that I think about it, it could have been a 17 MB card. Sorry my mistake:)(Still pretty good for a 17 MB card though) /edit: No, it was a 7 MB voodoo. I needed a 16 MB card to play a game back then. And I couldnt play it till I got my 32 MB radeon. So yeah, they did have 7 MB cards back in 1999. I see...........
teff Posted December 20, 2004 Author Posted December 20, 2004 Updated!!!!!! I have unzipped all the ".pk3" files!!!!! This improve the game speed a lot!!!!!!! Let see the sreenshots of the game after improved!!!!! And the LOD bias is remain "8"(sharpest)!!!!!!! The link: http://www.3dfxzone.it/enboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1443&whichpage=3
Maxstate Posted December 22, 2004 Posted December 22, 2004 I had a Daytona 8mb videocard without hardware acceleration:p Now i have an even crappier card : Geforce Fx5200 128mb And my pc looks a little like this: AMD athlon Thunderbird 1,4Ghz (1,8 intel+) About 300 mb ram Itachi Deskstar Hard drive 120 gb Dell 17 inch monitor:D
Fallen'VS Posted December 22, 2004 Posted December 22, 2004 Originally posted by TK42235 You know now that I think about it, it could have been a 17 MB card. Sorry my mistake:)(Still pretty good for a 17 MB card though) /edit: No, it was a 7 MB voodoo. I needed a 16 MB card to play a game back then. And I couldnt play it till I got my 32 MB radeon. So yeah, they did have 7 MB cards back in 1999. Lies. There never was a 7 mb or 17mb card of any kind. Chip makers have always kept to the multiples standard of doubling the previous chip. Hence, 2-4-8-16-32-64-128-256-512 Never any odd numbered video cards, and if you say otherwise PPOR (post proof or retract)
TK-425 Posted December 22, 2004 Posted December 22, 2004 Well,... it was probably an 8MB card. It was so long ago... I dont really remember very well. But it was a voodoo:D
teff Posted December 26, 2004 Author Posted December 26, 2004 Originally posted by TK42235 Well,... it was probably an 8MB card. It was so long ago... I dont really remember very well. But it was a voodoo:D Do you like Voodoo???????
TK-425 Posted December 26, 2004 Posted December 26, 2004 Originally posted by teff Do you like Voodoo??????? No,.. not really. But my first experiance was a bad one.
teff Posted December 30, 2004 Author Posted December 30, 2004 Originally posted by TK42235 No,.. not really. But my first experiance was a bad one. How bad is it???????
TK-425 Posted December 30, 2004 Posted December 30, 2004 Videos would display out of there windows and stuff like that. I hated it. Btw, in dxdiag it said my video card had 7 MB memory.
NewDigger Posted December 30, 2004 Posted December 30, 2004 I feel I should point out it would be impossible to have a 7 MB Graphics card. This is because of the way computers count. 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, etc... If you did have a 7 MB one, or 300 MB of RAM a computer would probably cease to work.
Darth Straker Posted January 7, 2005 Posted January 7, 2005 Amazing how it works pretty good, actually.
TK-425 Posted January 9, 2005 Posted January 9, 2005 What do you make of this picture then? I just want to point out that I am not saying that they make 31.0 MB video cards. I am saying this is what I see in DirectX diag, hense this is why I said I had a 7 MB video card:)
CaptainRAVE Posted January 12, 2005 Posted January 12, 2005 Neat. But JA only uses alot of memory when the graphics settings (mainly the textures) are set to high (or very high, cant remember).
NewDigger Posted January 13, 2005 Posted January 13, 2005 I have no idea, I'd just say it's faulty. I doubt it is actually 31 MB card, but actually 32 MB. Same with 7, I'd say it actually means 8 MB. It's subtracting one from what it actually is?
TK-425 Posted January 13, 2005 Posted January 13, 2005 Ok, well atleast you know why I thought what I thought:D
[HR]Knight Posted January 23, 2005 Posted January 23, 2005 I think what he's trying to prove is because his computer sucks (no offense) he can play JKA and look decent , and while playing on a 1024 x 768, Which is good, which encourages people with the same type of graphics card/memory, etc. situation to actually buy the game. I love this guy, he's so happy all the time, lol.
teff Posted January 24, 2005 Author Posted January 24, 2005 Originally posted by Knight I think what he's trying to prove is because his computer sucks (no offense) he can play JKA and look decent , and while playing on a 1024 x 768, Which is good, which encourages people with the same type of graphics card/memory, etc. situation to actually buy the game. I love this guy, he's so happy all the time, lol. Thank you very much!!!!!!!!!!
teff Posted January 24, 2005 Author Posted January 24, 2005 I have updated again!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D :p Here are some of them: More: http://www.3dfxzone.it/enboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1443&whichpage=5
lukeskywalker1 Posted January 24, 2005 Posted January 24, 2005 No, memory can't be odd. Its got something to do with the pins, right? I don't think it could fit in the slot properly without the right ammount of pins. Maybe not, thats just my guess. Your RAM/Video Memory is just leaked. Heat and stuff like that corrupt it a little bit so it only reads 7 MBs instead of 8 (I THINK). For example: My computer says it has 502 RAM. In reality it has 512. Its just not reading 10 MBs of the RAM. Jedi Academy says I have 503 RAM. It also says I am running Direct X 9.0A when the Direct X Diagnostic Tool says I am running 9.0C.
teff Posted January 25, 2005 Author Posted January 25, 2005 Originally posted by lukeskywalker1 No, memory can't be odd. Its got something to do with the pins, right? I don't think it could fit in the slot properly without the right ammount of pins. Maybe not, thats just my guess. Your RAM/Video Memory is just leaked. Heat and stuff like that corrupt it a little bit so it only reads 7 MBs instead of 8 (I THINK). For example: My computer says it has 502 RAM. In reality it has 512. Its just not reading 10 MBs of the RAM. Jedi Academy says I have 503 RAM. It also says I am running Direct X 9.0A when the Direct X Diagnostic Tool says I am running 9.0C. I see........
Guest Jed Posted February 23, 2005 Posted February 23, 2005 Hey TK42235 and teff, can we keep the chatting to Private Messaging? Thanks.
teff Posted February 24, 2005 Author Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by Knight I think what he's trying to prove is because his computer sucks (no offense) he can play JKA and look decent , and while playing on a 1024 x 768, Which is good, which encourages people with the same type of graphics card/memory, etc. situation to actually buy the game. I love this guy, he's so happy all the time, lol. In fact, I am trying to encourages people with 3dfx video cards!!!! 3dfx had not died!!!!!!!! 3dfx never died!!!!!!!!! I think.....
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.