TK-425 Posted December 9, 2004 Share Posted December 9, 2004 You know now that I think about it, it could have been a 17 MB card. Sorry my mistake:)(Still pretty good for a 17 MB card though) /edit: No, it was a 7 MB voodoo. I needed a 16 MB card to play a game back then. And I couldnt play it till I got my 32 MB radeon. So yeah, they did have 7 MB cards back in 1999. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teff Posted December 11, 2004 Author Share Posted December 11, 2004 Originally posted by TK42235 You know now that I think about it, it could have been a 17 MB card. Sorry my mistake:)(Still pretty good for a 17 MB card though) /edit: No, it was a 7 MB voodoo. I needed a 16 MB card to play a game back then. And I couldnt play it till I got my 32 MB radeon. So yeah, they did have 7 MB cards back in 1999. I see........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teff Posted December 20, 2004 Author Share Posted December 20, 2004 Updated!!!!!! I have unzipped all the ".pk3" files!!!!! This improve the game speed a lot!!!!!!! Let see the sreenshots of the game after improved!!!!! And the LOD bias is remain "8"(sharpest)!!!!!!! The link: http://www.3dfxzone.it/enboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1443&whichpage=3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxstate Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 I had a Daytona 8mb videocard without hardware acceleration:p Now i have an even crappier card : Geforce Fx5200 128mb And my pc looks a little like this: AMD athlon Thunderbird 1,4Ghz (1,8 intel+) About 300 mb ram Itachi Deskstar Hard drive 120 gb Dell 17 inch monitor:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fallen'VS Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Originally posted by TK42235 You know now that I think about it, it could have been a 17 MB card. Sorry my mistake:)(Still pretty good for a 17 MB card though) /edit: No, it was a 7 MB voodoo. I needed a 16 MB card to play a game back then. And I couldnt play it till I got my 32 MB radeon. So yeah, they did have 7 MB cards back in 1999. Lies. There never was a 7 mb or 17mb card of any kind. Chip makers have always kept to the multiples standard of doubling the previous chip. Hence, 2-4-8-16-32-64-128-256-512 Never any odd numbered video cards, and if you say otherwise PPOR (post proof or retract) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-425 Posted December 22, 2004 Share Posted December 22, 2004 Well,... it was probably an 8MB card. It was so long ago... I dont really remember very well. But it was a voodoo:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teff Posted December 26, 2004 Author Share Posted December 26, 2004 Originally posted by TK42235 Well,... it was probably an 8MB card. It was so long ago... I dont really remember very well. But it was a voodoo:D Do you like Voodoo??????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-425 Posted December 26, 2004 Share Posted December 26, 2004 Originally posted by teff Do you like Voodoo??????? No,.. not really. But my first experiance was a bad one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teff Posted December 30, 2004 Author Share Posted December 30, 2004 Originally posted by TK42235 No,.. not really. But my first experiance was a bad one. How bad is it??????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-425 Posted December 30, 2004 Share Posted December 30, 2004 Videos would display out of there windows and stuff like that. I hated it. Btw, in dxdiag it said my video card had 7 MB memory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewDigger Posted December 30, 2004 Share Posted December 30, 2004 I feel I should point out it would be impossible to have a 7 MB Graphics card. This is because of the way computers count. 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, etc... If you did have a 7 MB one, or 300 MB of RAM a computer would probably cease to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Straker Posted January 7, 2005 Share Posted January 7, 2005 Amazing how it works pretty good, actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-425 Posted January 9, 2005 Share Posted January 9, 2005 What do you make of this picture then? I just want to point out that I am not saying that they make 31.0 MB video cards. I am saying this is what I see in DirectX diag, hense this is why I said I had a 7 MB video card:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainRAVE Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 Neat. But JA only uses alot of memory when the graphics settings (mainly the textures) are set to high (or very high, cant remember). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewDigger Posted January 13, 2005 Share Posted January 13, 2005 I have no idea, I'd just say it's faulty. I doubt it is actually 31 MB card, but actually 32 MB. Same with 7, I'd say it actually means 8 MB. It's subtracting one from what it actually is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-425 Posted January 13, 2005 Share Posted January 13, 2005 Ok, well atleast you know why I thought what I thought:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teff Posted January 15, 2005 Author Share Posted January 15, 2005 Oh!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[HR]Knight Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 I think what he's trying to prove is because his computer sucks (no offense) he can play JKA and look decent , and while playing on a 1024 x 768, Which is good, which encourages people with the same type of graphics card/memory, etc. situation to actually buy the game. I love this guy, he's so happy all the time, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teff Posted January 24, 2005 Author Share Posted January 24, 2005 Originally posted by Knight I think what he's trying to prove is because his computer sucks (no offense) he can play JKA and look decent , and while playing on a 1024 x 768, Which is good, which encourages people with the same type of graphics card/memory, etc. situation to actually buy the game. I love this guy, he's so happy all the time, lol. Thank you very much!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teff Posted January 24, 2005 Author Share Posted January 24, 2005 I have updated again!!!!!!!!!!! :D :D :p Here are some of them: More: http://www.3dfxzone.it/enboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1443&whichpage=5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukeskywalker1 Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 No, memory can't be odd. Its got something to do with the pins, right? I don't think it could fit in the slot properly without the right ammount of pins. Maybe not, thats just my guess. Your RAM/Video Memory is just leaked. Heat and stuff like that corrupt it a little bit so it only reads 7 MBs instead of 8 (I THINK). For example: My computer says it has 502 RAM. In reality it has 512. Its just not reading 10 MBs of the RAM. Jedi Academy says I have 503 RAM. It also says I am running Direct X 9.0A when the Direct X Diagnostic Tool says I am running 9.0C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teff Posted January 25, 2005 Author Share Posted January 25, 2005 Originally posted by lukeskywalker1 No, memory can't be odd. Its got something to do with the pins, right? I don't think it could fit in the slot properly without the right ammount of pins. Maybe not, thats just my guess. Your RAM/Video Memory is just leaked. Heat and stuff like that corrupt it a little bit so it only reads 7 MBs instead of 8 (I THINK). For example: My computer says it has 502 RAM. In reality it has 512. Its just not reading 10 MBs of the RAM. Jedi Academy says I have 503 RAM. It also says I am running Direct X 9.0A when the Direct X Diagnostic Tool says I am running 9.0C. I see........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Smaug Posted February 22, 2005 Share Posted February 22, 2005 srry but they are not that good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jed Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 Hey TK42235 and teff, can we keep the chatting to Private Messaging? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teff Posted February 24, 2005 Author Share Posted February 24, 2005 Originally posted by Knight I think what he's trying to prove is because his computer sucks (no offense) he can play JKA and look decent , and while playing on a 1024 x 768, Which is good, which encourages people with the same type of graphics card/memory, etc. situation to actually buy the game. I love this guy, he's so happy all the time, lol. In fact, I am trying to encourages people with 3dfx video cards!!!! 3dfx had not died!!!!!!!! 3dfx never died!!!!!!!!! I think..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.