Docter_Aap Posted December 27, 2006 Posted December 27, 2006 I personally think it sucks. I mean the Consortium doesnt have to do anything hard. Just pay the money and blow up a 1-build-limit battle station, the surrounding fleet, and the planet below it. That's just unfair.
Darth Anarch Posted December 28, 2006 Posted December 28, 2006 But then again, can't the Empire just build another Death Star? And IG-88 is gone forever after he blows up the first one, correct?
YertyL Posted December 28, 2006 Posted December 28, 2006 No, they cannot - which btw. makes sense since else an Imp player could just say "Here comes my second DS - GG ZC player "
jedi jim 1989 Posted December 29, 2006 Posted December 29, 2006 also in cannon (i no this game isnt exactly cannon) i believe that the death star nearly bankrupt the empire or something (not 100% but im sure i herd that or read it somewhere)
Docter_Aap Posted December 29, 2006 Author Posted December 29, 2006 It also destroyed Naboo. it had an expensive base and it was full of expensive units (DT III, ATATs)
JoesGuy Posted January 9, 2007 Posted January 9, 2007 Aw what's wrong? Baby's widdle Empire is being threatened by a single droid? This is why I enjoyed the Zann Consortium Campaign. It gives the Empire (and you Empire enthusiasts) something to really worry about. But then, you can always build another, right? Not that I've ever used this feature, I really like IG-88.
JoesGuy Posted January 9, 2007 Posted January 9, 2007 It also destroyed Naboo. it had an expensive base and it was full of expensive units (DT III, ATATs) Sorry for the double post, but when you say destroyed you don't mean physically "blown up" do you? If so, I believe the second Death Star only destroyed one planet and it wasn't Naboo.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.