King Dando Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 Actually I would think that it would improve the movie as more villians means more Spider-Man and more Spider-Man means more action overall. So I still think this movie would be awesome even if they did have a large number of villians. But they'd have to make the movie much longer, and spend more money I'm thinking... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SithRevan Posted January 5, 2007 Author Share Posted January 5, 2007 But they'd have to make the movie much longer, and spend more money I'm thinking... Yes but then it becomes a win-win deal for all of us as the more money they spend on it and the more time they put into it the better the movie will be (or so I think.) I think overall we will have to wait and see what they do to really be able to judge if this movie is going to be good or not but my bet is it is going to be a good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Negative Sun Posted January 5, 2007 Share Posted January 5, 2007 The full trailer and much better quality than youtube can be found here, you might want to put that in your first post there SithRevan... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SithRevan Posted January 5, 2007 Author Share Posted January 5, 2007 The full trailer and much better quality than youtube can be found here, you might want to put that in your first post there SithRevan... Thanks Negative Sun I just added that in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedHawke Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Actually I would think that it would improve the movie as more villians means more Spider-Man and more Spider-Man means more action overall. So I still think this movie would be awesome even if they did have a large number of villians. I'm glad you don't make movies then. The more villians/characters you add the less time you have for any sort of development of them. Tis a sad fact. (The Batman movies 2-4 are prime examples of this.) There is now way in 90-120 minutes that you can flesh out the Sandman, Venom, and the son of the Goblin into one movie and not cut some of their development. When is Spidy/Parker supposed to be in the film? Far too much! Hence I sense a bad movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SithRevan Posted January 6, 2007 Author Share Posted January 6, 2007 I'm glad you don't make movies then. The more villians/characters you add the less time you have for any sort of development of them. Tis a sad fact. (The Batman movies 2-4 are prime examples of this.) There is now way in 90-120 minutes that you can flesh out the Sandman, Venom, and the son of the Goblin into one movie and not cut some of their development. When is Spidy/Parker supposed to be in the film? Far too much! Hence I sense a bad movie. Well I guess you are right but I just thought if you had more time in a movie you could do more with it you know. Ah but still I am not the one who is making the movie so it is not my call. Overall I think they will do a great job making this movie like they did the other two and I am sure that all of us spidy fans will love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.