Emperor Devon Posted December 16, 2007 Posted December 16, 2007 aeroldoth said: Wow, many of the older games are ridiculously priced! Supply and demand. With Black Isle out of business copies of Torment are no longer made, and the few people who still want to play the game are willing to pay it. (With reason, I might add - Torment is worth every penny it will cost you.) Anyways, I'll join along with the crowd that's lauding Torment - it's a truly excellent game. (I mean, it's written by Chris Avellone and in the Planescape D&D setting - how could it not be an excellent game? ) Without spoiling much, it takes place in the bizarre city of Sigil in the Outer Planes (where belief dictates a consensus reality rather than the laws of physics). Your character awakens in a mortuary with his memories gone (it's actually much less cliche than it sounds, but that's a spoiler) to the slang-filled chattering of a floating skull with eyes who seems to be taking this whole situation as entirely normal. You see your body is covered in countless scars, and from what the skull reads to you has several paragraphs of text tattooed onto your back. (In addition to a variety of magical tattoos that provide you with protection - you're no knight in shining armor, you're what looks like a walking corpse killed ten times over with tattoos depicting suffering and torment.) Anyways, I can't say anything about the storyline (if you don't mind spoilers, major or minor) but it's all very-well done and your character's above mentioned appearance is there for plot reasons rather than simply making everything look dramatic. That's another thing I love about the game so much - it has the bizarrest of locales and characters, and they're all put in there solely for plot reasons than for adding atmosphere. Atmosphere is good, yes, but when you can weave the environment's atmosphere into the plot it makes things simply marvelous. And yes, that extends to everything from the giant pillar formed out of the rotting heads of people who were lying sages in life to the Brothel for Slaking Intellectual Lusts (where the 'prostitutes' are all trained to engage in debate/storytelling/verbal dueling/other ways that satisfy one's lust for mental pleasure). If you've not gathered already, Torment is not your typical fantasy game. There are no swords (well, actually just 3) present, but there are a variety of clubs, maces, and weapons formed from things like your own blood, a condensed chunk of reality from a Chaos-aligned plane of existence, or a guy's arm (does that count as a club?). There aren't any orcs, elves, or dwarves either, but there are plenty of shadows formed from the hateful spirits of slain men, demons, devils, angels, hags (a number of the former not being as close to their alignments as you might guess), golems and men who only exist because people think they do rather than from being born/forged... you get the picture. It's all very non-standard fantasy, and complements the plot perfectly. aeroldoth said: Other posters here constantly hint that K2 doesn't compare to K1. What are your thoughts? Completely untrue. I've never understood the source of the TSL-bashing around most places. Two constant gripes are bugs and the "unfinished" storyline - both of which I don't understand the source of either. I ran into a few bugs, sure, but honestly about as many as I did with K1. If you search the forums you'll come across a number of posts that make similar assertions, and very few that even name specific bugs people have run into when they criticize the game for them. Most of the criticism of the storyline is also unfounded. Amusingly enough, if you look far enough back in the forum's history you'll notice most of the bashing of TSL's storyline didn't start until around when all the cut content was found out and made known. 'The game isn't complete' has become more of an unexplained and universally accepted mantra most people repeat without considering than a legitimate opinion IMO. I mean, really - on the rare occasion anyone deigns to elaborate as to why the game actually isn't complete, they cite (I'll leave out spoilers since you've not played the game) one single line said by a character about a place you never get to visit. Yes, that one, completely possible to miss and non-plot critical line is one of the things that ruins the story. The other is in regards to the end of game, where a sequence between two of the characters has to be inferred through what happens at the end rather than a direct cutscene. All right, so you don't see those two characters interact with each other directly. I suppose that's only an issue if you like every detail of your game to be spoon-fed to you, as there are only two possible outcomes to that situation and the final cutscenes make what happened almost painfully obvious. Why anything thinks not seeing that situation in front of your eyes makes the game incomplete I can't begin to guess. The only truly legitimate critcism of the storyline is how some dialogue explaining a few plot-critical things is optional. Understandably, the last parts of the game can be confusing without knowing it. I, however, never found it to be a problem (first playthrough included) as I make it a habit to exhaust every dialogue option with all NPCs and explore every nook and cranny of the areas I go through in RPGs. Without spoiling much, the mentioned plot-critical dialogue can be heard at any time by talking to your party members. Unless you don't care at all about character interaction or any semblance of roleplaying, anyway... in which case I suppose whether the plot is well-written or not is no longer a problem. Anyways, that's my take on it. Personally I've yet to see any truly valid defense of the notion TSL has an awful/unfinished plot. I'd definitely encourage you to get it; it's a crime to play KotOR and miss out on its sequel! Achilles said: I will tell you that of the games I listed, NWN2 had the most nuanced story. Moral ambiguity, depth of character, etc, etc. Let's be sure we're on the same page... you were talking the MotB expansion and surely not the OC, right? Anyways, I've not seen any full-length reviews of MotB (Mask of the Betrayer) like I've provided for the previous two games, so I might as well do one more. MotB is the expansion pack, content and story-wise, from the original NWN2. The OC for that was kinda meh; it had some good moments, but all things considered it was an unoriginal 'save the world' fantasy story with antagonists that had as much character depth as brick walls, and party members who were equally unoriginal and felt like their cookie-cutter personalities were based off their classes rather than a desire of the developers to make them unique individuals in their own right. (A sneaky kleptomaniacal thief, a chivalrous paladin, a firey-tempered sorceress... oooh, original.) Still... don't let that dissuade you. It can be fun to play if you don't always want a masterful storyline and feel like playing through what's essentially your everyday 'save the world from an ancient evil' D&D campaign. And a break from excellent storytelling isn't always a bad thing; Wittgenstein liked to read cheap detective stories in his spare time after all. The expansion pack is a completely different story. (Oooh... I thought up an uncreative and not even groan-elicitating pun.) It starts with your character from the previous campaign waking up in a barrow below thousands of tons of earth, lying on the ground in what would've been a pool of his/her own blood if the giant wound hadn't been poorly stitched up. You've no idea why you're there, (no amnesia though) or why the morally ambiguous woman serving a morally unambiguous organization who frees you from the surrounding wards chooses to do so. You're promptly told you have to get the hell out of the barrow before the spirit animals come after you, and soon get caught up in an intrigue-filled plot involving supernatural curses, covens of hags, shadow parallels of your reality, the dead, spirits, people with insatiable hungers, the Witches of Rashemen and the Red Wizards of Thay. Again I can't got into too much detail without spoiling anything, but it's really all excellently done. It probably has some of the most thought-provoking concepts I've yet seen in a game; I was staring at my computer screen for an hourish thinking of what way to resolve a particular moral dilemma (moral ambiguity is not one of the game's main focuses however). Secularism vs. religion (well, sort of) is also a heavy concept in the game. Rather surprising considering how gods do exist and have walked the earth in the game's setting, but no one said that gods are automatically deserving of worship. Anyways, I've typed up a maelstrom... get Torment, TSL, NWN2 (the OC is worth playing), and of course the MotB expansion. You'll have a ton of fun with them all.
Arátoeldar Posted December 16, 2007 Posted December 16, 2007 aeroldoth said: Wow, many of the older games are ridiculously priced! Planescape: Torment, Daggerfall, Arcanum and Wizardry 8 are all around $50 each. That's quite pricey for old games. EDIT: Arátoeldar, some of the games you list appear twice on listings at Amazon. One version is listed as by Jowood, the other by Aspyr. Is there a difference (in the game) between the two publishers, do you know? Jowood = original publisher Aspyr = Mostly known for converting PC games to Mac.
Aeroldoth Posted December 16, 2007 Author Posted December 16, 2007 IIRC JoWood is in Germany. Do you suppose that means that Aspyr may have fixed some bugs, since they came later, or do you think they may have censored parts for US distribution? EDIT: What do people think of Jade Empire?
Achilles Posted December 16, 2007 Posted December 16, 2007 Emperor Devon said: and party members who were equally unoriginal and felt like their cookie-cutter personalities were based off their classes rather than a desire of the developers to make them unique individuals in their own right. (A sneaky kleptomaniacal thief, a chivalrous paladin, a firey-tempered sorceress... oooh, original.) A demon that had been kicked out of her world and raised by priests, a defender of the kingdom that had rejected his duty (incurring a bounty, IIRC) in order to serve what he considered to be "the greater good", a fiery sorceress with too much pride to admit that she can barely control her own power. I notice that you didn't mention the warlock or the other antagonist (but we both know that would have been spoilers galore). I guess it all comes down to how you want to look at the characters. I think you may have unfairly glossed over much of the depth that was there. But of course this is only my opinion. Take care, my friend.
Aeroldoth Posted December 16, 2007 Author Posted December 16, 2007 Emperor Devon said: (With reason, I might add - Torment is worth every penny it will cost you.)First, let me thank your Imperial Majesty for your post. It's always nice to see people take the time to share their thoughts; I appreciate the time you put into typing all that. Now, you say it's worth every penny. Did I mention that Ebay had it listed for as much as $100?! (Although, there were cheaper copies.) Emperor Devon said: Most of the criticism of the storyline is also unfounded. Amusingly enough, if you look far enough back in the forum's history you'll notice most of the bashing of TSL's storyline didn't start until around when all the cut content was found out and made known. Aah, that explains a lot, thank you.
Corinthian Posted December 16, 2007 Posted December 16, 2007 You gotta admit, though, Emperor, TSL's ending was both crap and felt rushed. You crash-land, everyone seems to get flung about a hundred klicks across Malachor's surface, and then you do something with Mira and the Remote, only one of which is significant in any way, shape, or form, and then you do another Assault on Sith Castle (Like we didn't do enough of those) kill Sion with Love and kill Traya with Lightsabers. It wasn't a particularly grand, climactic showdown.
Aeroldoth Posted December 16, 2007 Author Posted December 16, 2007 (C, I averted my eyes after getting the sense that your post above contains spoilers. Does it?) Well, I've placed an order with Amazon... prolly not too bright to be ordering during Christmas rush. Here's what I've selected: Gothic 3 - $7.99 - Deus Ex 2: Invisible War - $4.00 - Guild 1 1400 Gold Edition - $5.98 - Betrayal at Krondor (PC) - $7.95 - Thief Bundle: Thief 1 and 2 - $11.79 - Dark Messiah of Might & Magic - $10.99 - Fallout Collection (1, 2, & Tactics) - $12.95 - Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines - $9.99 - Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords - $19.99 - Not too bad for $115. Some of the games I was iffy about, but for about ten bucks a game, how can you go wrong? Some of the others mentioned here looked interesting, but were too pricey IMO. I'm not keen on spending ~ $50 for a ten year-old game. I won't buy them from Amazon but may check in on Ebay now and then to see if they're on sale. Suggestions still welcome.
Arátoeldar Posted December 16, 2007 Posted December 16, 2007 aeroldoth said: First, let me thank your Imperial Majesty for your post. It's always nice to see people take the time to share their thoughts; I appreciate the time you put into typing all that. Now, you say it's worth every penny. Did I mention that Ebay had it listed for as much as $100?! (Although, there were cheaper copies.) Aah, that explains a lot, thank you. I'd wait until after Christmas to see if price come down. It ll about supply and demand. For a long time the MS Natural Pro KBs were expensive. Now they are very reasonable.
Achilles Posted December 16, 2007 Posted December 16, 2007 LukeDavis93 said: I know what RPG is but what is a CRPG? Google/Wikipedia to the rescue
Balderdash Posted December 16, 2007 Posted December 16, 2007 Emperor Devon said: Without spoiling much, it takes place in the bizarre city of Sigil in the Outer Planes (where belief dictates a consensus reality rather than the laws of physics). Your character awakens in a mortuary with his memories gone (it's actually much less cliche than it sounds, but that's a spoiler) to the slang-filled chattering of a floating skull with eyes who seems to be taking this whole situation as entirely normal. You see your body is covered in countless scars, and from what the skull reads to you has several paragraphs of text tattooed onto your back. (In addition to a variety of magical tattoos that provide you with protection - you're no knight in shining armor, you're what looks like a walking corpse killed ten times over with tattoos depicting suffering and torment.) Anyways, I can't say anything about the storyline (if you don't mind spoilers, major or minor) but it's all very-well done and your character's above mentioned appearance is there for plot reasons rather than simply making everything look dramatic. That's another thing I love about the game so much - it has the bizarrest of locales and characters, and they're all put in there solely for plot reasons than for adding atmosphere. Atmosphere is good, yes, but when you can weave the environment's atmosphere into the plot it makes things simply marvelous. And yes, that extends to everything from the giant pillar formed out of the rotting heads of people who were lying sages in life to the Brothel for Slaking Intellectual Lusts (where the 'prostitutes' are all trained to engage in debate/storytelling/verbal dueling/other ways that satisfy one's lust for mental pleasure). If you've not gathered already, Torment is not your typical fantasy game. There are no swords (well, actually just 3) present, but there are a variety of clubs, maces, and weapons formed from things like your own blood, a condensed chunk of reality from a Chaos-aligned plane of existence, or a guy's arm (does that count as a club?). There aren't any orcs, elves, or dwarves either, but there are plenty of shadows formed from the hateful spirits of slain men, demons, devils, angels, hags (a number of the former not being as close to their alignments as you might guess), golems and men who only exist because people think they do rather than from being born/forged... you get the picture. It's all very non-standard fantasy, and complements the plot perfectly. Great synopsis. Everyone should play this game at some point or another. I should say that not everyone who has played Torment ends up loving the experience for ever and ever - you could even argue that it's an acquired taste - but it certainly is an experience like no other. Achilles said: A demon that had been kicked out of her world and raised by priests, a defender of the kingdom that had rejected his duty (incurring a bounty, IIRC) in order to serve what he considered to be "the greater good", a fiery sorceress with too much pride to admit that she can barely control her own power. I notice that you didn't mention the warlock or the other antagonist (but we both know that would have been spoilers galore). I guess it all comes down to how you want to look at the characters. I think you may have unfairly glossed over much of the depth that was there. But of course this is only my opinion. Take care, my friend. When it comes to NWN2's OC... I think it's fair to say that the developers themselves glossed over much of the potential depth of the characters when they made the game what it was. They could've made a great deal more out of the more interesting aspects that you just listed, but they never did. Untapped potential doesn't make a great game. On the other hand, Mask of the Betrayer's companions each have a great deal more to say to you (all of them have probably about twice as much interpersonal dialogue with the PC as everyone in the OC... except perhaps the warlock... and bear in mind, this is also all in a much shorter game). And everything your companions talk about is in some way elaborated on by the characters the further you play through the story, and there are more choices and consequences as a result, the further you advance the plot.
Achilles Posted December 16, 2007 Posted December 16, 2007 Balderdash said: When it comes to NWN2's OC... I think it's fair to say that the developers themselves glossed over much of the potential depth of the characters when they made the game what it was. They could've made a great deal more out of the more interesting aspects that you just listed, but they never did. Untapped potential doesn't make a great game.Certainly they could have put more time into each of the 11 companions' backstories, banter, etc. But at the expense of what? I'm sure we could pick any title you'd like and find "untapped potential". I don't think that automatically excluded a game from being good (and in some aspects, better than comparable games). Balderdash said: On the other hand, Mask of the Betrayer's companions each have a great deal more to say to you (all of them have probably about twice as much interpersonal dialogue with the PC as everyone in the OC... except perhaps the warlock... and bear in mind, this is also all in a much shorter game). And everything your companions talk about is in some way elaborated on by the characters the further you play through the story, and there are more choices and consequences as a result, the further you advance the plot. This is great info to have. I was already looking forward to playing MotB, as it was
Emperor Devon Posted December 16, 2007 Posted December 16, 2007 Achilles said: A demon that had been kicked out of her world and raised by priests, If you'd prefer to split hairs, Reveal hidden contents some of the dev comments in Mephasm's dialogue mention that she's his 'creation' so that would technically make her part-devil. But in any case, interesting a plot point as that may be, you don't get to see it anywhere in-game. Which is a definite pity, I think it could've saved Neeshka from having a character that looked like it was built entirely off her class. As-is she's far from original; a sneaky untrustworthy thief who's run afoul of the law and some past partners. No character development or consideration of her part-fiendish nature to speak of. Achilles said: a defender of the kingdom that had rejected his duty (incurring a bounty, IIRC) in order to serve what he considered to be "the greater good", All revealed in about twenty lines of dialogue. More untapped but squandered potential - Casavir tells you all about how little faith he has in Neverwinter when you first meet him, stays silent for the next several acts, and then if you're female confesses you've made him believe in Neverwinter again and asks to hit the sack. No transitional stages of thought, barely any dialogue for most of the game, and you only get to see his new opinion if you've picked the right gender. Achilles said: a fiery sorceress with too much pride to admit that she can barely control her own power. Which she never admits (or even pauses to consider), leaving her just as fiery and stuck-up at the end of the game as she was at the start of it. Again no character development to speak of, not even several lines. Unused potential unfortunately doesn't count. Achilles said: I notice that you didn't mention the warlock or the other antagonist (but we both know that would have been spoilers galore). Ja, can't really say anything about either without spoiling anything. But to address them... Reveal hidden contents Ammon, I concede, was a fairly well-developed character. One of the few in the game I can say that for. My only problem was that I couldn't empathize with his loss of Shandra, as I had stood up and let out a cheer when I saw him kill her. Slightly squandered potential with me, but I liked the rest of him. Someone who sells their soul to achieve a greater good isn't terribly original, yes, but there are so many opportunities for character development in it I suppose originality isn't that big a factor. Pity he got so nerfed in Mask of the Betrayer! Reveal hidden contents On the main villain, again squandered potential. The only lines regarding his past are seen in one area and completely irrelevant to the plot; I could've stuck my fingers in my ears, hummed loudly and shut my eyes during those dialogues and it wouldn't have left me even slightly confused later on in the game. Whether you know the KoS' backstory or not, he's basically just a big animal you need to put down. Perhaps if his past could've been brought up at least a few other times or factored into the final battle somehow I'd have liked him more. But as-is his backstory is an interesting yet irrelevant tidbit you can find out about him. Achilles said: This is great info to have. I was already looking forward to playing MotB, as it was Ohh, you definitely should. Your party consists of a Neutral-aligned and very secular Red Wizard, a handsome and witty hagspawn who claims to have been born from people's dreams, and an idealistic half-angel cleric who's worshiped several gods and struggles with issues with her faith. There's also two mutually exclusive ones depending on your alignment. The good one I can't say if you don't like minor spoilers, though the evil one is probably the most bizarre and original of the bunch; he/she/it/they are thousands of evil souls (murderers, rapists, thieves, liars, heretics, a few innocents) all bound together into a wraith-like form and called One of Many. (The One being the currently dominant soul that speaks for the Many.) Quote I'm not keen on spending ~ $50 for a ten year-old game. The site I was able to get it from had it for only $50, so it's not impossible to get for a reasonable price. Unfortunately I don't still have the link, though if you search enough you may be able to find it. Replies to Corinthian are below; unless you want the ending to TSL spoiled you should skim over it. Reveal hidden contents Quote Reveal hidden contents You crash-land, everyone seems to get flung about a hundred klicks across Malachor's surface, Not seeing any problems so far. Quote Reveal hidden contents and then you do something with Mira and the Remote, only one of which is significant in any way, shape, or form Untrue. The Hanharr confrontation resolves the subplot between him and Mira, and ultimately determines whether Mira values her integrity over her life. Should she left him live knowing she's held herself to a higher standard? Arguably she has truly defeated him by not allowing him to corrupt her moral code of never killing. Or does she decide to kill him, her life being worth more than his? It's not an uncommon dilemma, yes, but I love seeing it. So whether it was significant to the main plot or not, I don't think you dismiss it as worthless. Quote Reveal hidden contents and then you do another Assault on Sith Castle (Like we didn't do enough of those) Is there an alternative environment that would have helped make the ending more satisfying? I really don't see what the locale has to do with it. Quote Reveal hidden contents kill Sion with Love and kill Traya with Lightsabers. An almost plot-killingly brief summarization that makes no mention of any of the character development or answers to the game's many questions. Quote Reveal hidden contents It wasn't a particularly grand, climactic showdown. Don't see why you should find a lack of grand climaxes to be a problem, being a fan of Torment yourself. (Probably the most non-epic RPG there is.) All in all it looks like you simply took issue with where the ending took place, how you defeated the antagonists and that a non-plot-critical scene was put into a plot-critical sequence. You're welcome to criticizing those, but they bear no relevance at all towards how well the ending was done or whether the game was incomplete. If you'd like to mention why you think those criticisms are valid, however, I'd be happy to debate you over them.
Achilles Posted December 16, 2007 Posted December 16, 2007 Emperor Devon said: If you'd prefer to split hairs <snip> Considering the endorsement that you gave TSL (who's characters were equally developed if not less so), I can only conclude that you're applying some sort of double standard or are bashing NWN2 because you feel it's fashionable to do so. I don't mind having standards, but it sure would be nice to see them used consistently. Emperor Devon said: But in any case, interesting a plot point as that may be, you don't get to see it anywhere in-game. Which is a definite pity, I think it could've saved Neeshka from having a character that looked like it was built entirely off her class. As-is she's far from original; a sneaky untrustworthy thief who's run afoul of the law and some past partners. No character development or consideration of her part-fiendish nature to speak of. Aside from the whole "raised by priest/struggling against her nature" thing I mentioned earlier. Emperor Devon said: All revealed in about twenty lines of dialogue. More untapped but squandered potential - Casavir tells you all about how little faith he has in Neverwinter when you first meet him, stays silent for the next several acts, and then if you're female confesses you've made him believe in Neverwinter again and asks to hit the sack. No transitional stages of thought, barely any dialogue for most of the game, and you only get to see his new opinion if you've picked the right gender. Oh. How many lines of dialog are required to meet the "3 dimensional" character threshold? You can learn everything there is to know about Visas Marr or the Disciple in a single dialog. Crap characters too? I would venture to say maybe, but then again you were endorsing TSL a few posts ago. Emperor Devon said: Which she never admits (or even pauses to consider), leaving her just as fiery and stuck-up at the end of the game as she was at the start of it. Again no character development to speak of, not even several lines. Unused potential unfortunately doesn't count.So because *she* never talks about it, it can't be part of her character? I thought we were discussing nuanced games where not every detail is spoon-fed to us by devs that don't want to insult our intelligence. Did I wander into a different thread? Thanks for reading.
Emperor Devon Posted December 17, 2007 Posted December 17, 2007 Achilles said: Considering the endorsement that you gave TSL (who's characters were equally developed if not less so), I can only conclude that you're applying some sort of double standard or are bashing NWN2 because you feel it's fashionable to do so. I disagree; I found them all quite well-developed and non-cliche for the most part, though a critique of them all and a comparison to the NWN2 companions would take quite a while. Are there any specific instances you'd be willing to go into? Kudos for a response. Edit: Ooooh, I responded one minute too early and now it looks like I've gone blind or am intentionally ignoring points I don't like or something...
Achilles Posted December 17, 2007 Posted December 17, 2007 I fleshed out post #39. If I didn't address your points there, please let me know and I'll be happy to take another stab at it Take care.
Corinthian Posted December 17, 2007 Posted December 17, 2007 Admittedly, TSL wasn't as bad as I make it sound - I liked it. But you have no real choices throughout the game, and the Light Side/Dark Side choice not only is completely insigificant, but makes no sense. Malachor V should be destroyed whether you're Light or Dark, given that it's not your intervention that destroys it. It's just an annoying plot device. TSL needed an epic confrontation because the game was on an epic scale. Fate of the Galaxy and all that. On the other hand, Planescape mostly revolved around the fate of the Immortal's soul and mind.
Balderdash Posted December 17, 2007 Posted December 17, 2007 Achilles said: Certainly they could have put more time into each of the 11 companions' backstories, banter, etc. But at the expense of what?Obsidian could have afforded to to have fleshed out the characters to a greater extent at the expense of, for instance, most of the first act - which as I recall consisted of a lot of boring H&S that did not add a whole lot to the story. Achilles said: I'm sure we could pick any title you'd like and find "untapped potential". I don't think that automatically excluded a game from being good (and in some aspects, better than comparable games).True enough, and I liked the campaign enough to play it through three or four times, which does indeed place it above a lot of other games. I was responding solely to what I percieved as your misrepresentation of the characters' backstories when referring to "untapped potential" - I didn't mean to imply that this made the campaign as a whole a bad game. I just didn't ever experience a great game while playing the OC.
Emperor Devon Posted December 17, 2007 Posted December 17, 2007 Achilles said: Oh. How many lines of dialog are required to meet the "3 dimensional" character threshold? Perhaps you interpreted my complaint about the lack of dialogue as a complaint about the amount of dialogue itself rather than what it illustrated. My chief issue with Casavir was that while you know about his lack of faith in Neverwinter at the start of the game and how he's dealt with that at the end of it, there are no transitional stages of thought. Yes, I know, technically you could call him complete for it. He's faithless when you first meet him, and seeing CRK put together and the KoS resisted makes him believe once again in what Neverwinter can do - so obviously he underwent development, even if you weren't able to see most of it... but I'd have liked to have seen some transitional stages of thought, maybe a few dialogues where he starts to doubt his opinion. I suppose that meets the criterion for a 3-dimensional character if only technically. I'd still say a lot of his potential was squandered; any conversations the devs could've written about his re-emerging faith I think would have come out well. Achilles said: You can learn everything there is to know about Visas Marr or the Disciple in a single dialog. Crap characters too? I would venture to say maybe, but then again you were endorsing TSL a few posts ago. Never claimed them to be either. I've endorsed TSL and most of the characters, but never addressed them in particular. Achilles said: So because *she* never talks about it, it can't be part of her character? I thought we were discussing nuanced games where not every detail is spoon-fed to us by devs that don't want to insult our intelligence. Not spoon-feeding the details to us is one matter, a complete absence of any evidence of character development is another. There are literally no lines whatsoever where she displays any character development, or any that you can infer it from. By the time my character is fighting the KoS, how can I know whether she's actually thought about her inability to control her own power or is still completely oblivious to it? I'm all for having to infer details on your own without any lengthy expositions from the characters on how they feel, but when it gets to the point I have to start guessing (and with little evidence pointing towards either guess) whether their characters have changed, that crosses the line from realized to potential development on their part. Perhaps this could have been solved with the implementation of several of D&D's mind-reading spells, but unfortunately a lot of the non-combat-oriented ones never made it into the game. Reveal hidden contents Corinthian said: But you have no real choices throughout the game, A debatable issue in its own right, but unrelated to an incomplete plot. Corinthian said: the Light Side/Dark Side choice not only is completely insigificant, Still debatable, but irrelevant to your original point. Corinthian said: Malachor V should be destroyed whether you're Light or Dark, given that it's not your intervention that destroys it. So the primary thing that makes the game incomplete/poorly written is that a fight between Goto and the Remote gets resolved differently without your intervention depending on your alignment? Call it the will of the Force, call it luck; I think there was a pretty even chance of whether the Remote could activate the MSG or not before Goto destroyed him. Still, nitpicking about the realism of how a fight ended is what makes the storyline so awful? I suppose I can't account for your taste, but that seems a pretty weak thing to base your opinion off of to me. Corinthian said: TSL needed an epic confrontation because the game was on an epic scale. Fate of the Galaxy and all that. And here's why I think many people are disappointed about TSL; (apart from repeating a popular opinion) they expected it to be an epic game but it wasn't. It's really only half-epic; the Exile's actions impact the galaxy around her to an extent, yes, but the story is really about her and Kreia. Anyways, that's it? A not epic enough climax and fight sequence of dubious realism was enough to make the plot as awful as you've lambasted it for in so many threads? (I don't really see how that makes it 'rushed' as you put it either.)
Achilles Posted December 17, 2007 Posted December 17, 2007 Emperor Devon said: Perhaps you interpreted my complaint about the lack of dialogue as a complaint about the amount of dialogue itself rather than what it illustrated. Actually, I was simply trying to clarify the argument. Previously there seemed to be some significance assigned to the number of lines used. Emperor Devon said: My chief issue with Casavir was that while you know about his lack of faith in Neverwinter at the start of the game and how he's dealt with that at the end of it, there are no transitional stages of thought. Yes, I know, technically you could call him complete for it. He's faithless when you first meet him, and seeing CRK put together and the KoS resisted makes him believe once again in what Neverwinter can do - so obviously he underwent development, even if you weren't able to see most of it... but I'd have liked to have seen some transitional stages of thought, maybe a few dialogues where he starts to doubt his opinion.It's been a while, but IIRC, NWN2 really made you work for what you could get out of your companions. Perhaps there were parts that you missed (did you do unlock the romance dialogs)? Emperor Devon said: Never claimed them to be either. I've endorsed TSL and most of the characters, but never addressed them in particular. And I didn't say that you did. It was a question. You're free to answer however you'd like Emperor Devon said: Not spoon-feeding the details to us is one matter, a complete absence of any evidence of character development is another. There are literally no lines whatsoever where she displays any character development, or any that you can infer it from. By the time my character is fighting the KoS, how can I know whether she's actually thought about her inability to control her own power or is still completely oblivious to it? I'm all for having to infer details on your own without any lengthy expositions from the characters on how they feel, but when it gets to the point I have to start guessing (and with little evidence pointing towards either guess) whether their characters have changed, that crosses the line from realized to potential development on their part. Are we arguing depth of character or character development? I think my earlier arguments addressed the former while your points here attack the latter. Companion NPC don't need to undergo some great personality shift for me to consider them 3-dimensional. Plastering up a Johari Window on the character page isn't required. Emperor Devon said: Perhaps this could have been solved with the implementation of several of D&D's mind-reading spells, but unfortunately a lot of the non-combat-oriented ones never made it into the game. Again, yeah, if we're talking about some sort of character arc, that might be necessary, but we still appear to be wrestling with some sort of strawman that you've created (I think we hit a divergent path long about post #38). My original comments had to do with nuance and depth...not growth or change or eureka moment, epiphanies, enrollment in 12 step programs, etc.
SilentScope001 Posted December 18, 2007 Posted December 18, 2007 Quote Malachor V should be destroyed whether you're Light or Dark, given that it's not your intervention that destroys it. Reveal hidden contents Goto said in the game itself that it is up to The Exile to decide if he wants to blow up Malachor V or not. Not the Remote. So it is up to the Exile, if he wants to ally with the Remote or with Goto. If you are DS, you ally with Goto and try to unite the galaxy under the Sith Empire. If you are LS, you blow up Malachor V. ...As for TSL, well, in its favor, there are worse RPGs out there. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
Corinthian Posted December 18, 2007 Posted December 18, 2007 But the remote sets off the Mass Shadow Generator. Your choice has nothing to do with it.
SilentScope001 Posted December 18, 2007 Posted December 18, 2007 Quote But the remote sets off the Mass Shadow Generator. Your choice has nothing to do with it. Reveal hidden contents The remote was supposed to set it off, but Goto stopped him using his own remote-control commands. He wanted to protect Malachor V so that the Exile can use the resources to save the galaxy. He said that the choice belongs to the Exile, not to the Remote. If The Exile is LS, he would intervene on the side of the Remote and blow it up. The Exile himself knows about the Remote, he could say, "I can blow Malachor V and take us both of us" or "Malachor will live, but you will die". This again indicates that the Exile decides what will happen to Malachor V...save it, or kill it.
HappyMojo Posted December 20, 2007 Posted December 20, 2007 Just a copy paste from my closed thread... Jae got a darkside point *sniff* Quote I decided to give myself a Christmas present and bought "The Witcher" from Atari. And after I've been playing it almost non-stop (by my standards) since I got it, I must conclude that this game rocks. Sure the feel is a bit dodgy and the long loading times sometimes drive you insane, but... First of all it have mature story line, which means that it's not a game for minors *sho* *shoo*. But for an old geezer like me, it contains some of the things I've missed, like drinking contests, morale issues, a lot of twisting and turning the storyline, and other things... Secondly, the storyline isn't linear. Like in good old KOTOR you can choose to be a punk or a hero, but it isn't just the endings that changes from the choices you make. No, the entire game reacts to your decisions: The characters, the storyline and so on (a bit KOTOR2ish). This means when you've have finished the game after about 80 hours of gameplay, you can start all over and experience something quite different from what you just played. That is so cool in my book. Well, apart from playing KOTOR 1 and 2 without sound in vista (Stupid ATI card) what RPG's can you recommend?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.