Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted November 2, 2001 Share Posted November 2, 2001 dinghy "pointed" (offended would have been a better word) to me taht this: By me: get the info and do the math. its 2nd grade math, but w decimals was insulting. i re read it, and it does seem a little offensive. im sorry, it wasnt my intention, i was just explaining wot i did, but i think i was mad w something else and etc. anyway sorry if u got offended, it wasnt my intention. btw dinghy: y do u hate me? geez your always complaining about me! and u said By Dinghy: You and that Al guy seem to do this way too often. and Next, all you do is complain. Blah, blah, blah u complained about me bringin old topics abotu 11 times (whos the hypocrite now ), and all 11 times i answered taht i only brought them back (only 2 actually <IMG SRC="http://www.escapemi.com/forums/smilies/cwm28.gif" border=0> ) because: By me: I am going to look for the oldest topic in the forum as brighty would say, "pull that stick out your arse." <IMG SRC="http://www.escapemi.com/forums/smilies/cwm23.gif" border=0> <IMG SRC="http://www.escapemi.com/forums/smilies/cwm22.gif" border=0> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natty Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Al I wasn't offended, although when was the last time I brought back an old topic? I haven't done it since I realized how annoying everyone got over it. It's cool though, no worries. I was just wondering where you came up with that sort of figure on the number of postings with NiKo compared to Griswold that's all, I just didn't think it was a fair comment, coz he's been here longer than Griswold so of course he'll have more posts which will make the average higher. Says me who isn't good at math, least I think I'm right ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://nattsy.homestead.com/files/smurfsig.gif" border=0> Natty Is Feeling Very <IMG SRC="http://www.imood.com/query.cgi?email=nattydevil@optushome.com.au&type=1&fg=CC33F&bg=66CCFF" border=0> At This Present Time (Note Subject To Change Without Warning!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COJ Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 im sorry for causing such a mess....im sorry it wasnt my day back then..personal resons ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.angelfire.com/ab6/griswold/M.gif" border=0> isnt he the coolest monkey??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted November 3, 2001 Author Share Posted November 3, 2001 Originally posted by Natty: he's been here longer than Griswold so of course he'll have more posts which will make the average higher. well not really natty. imagine this: a guy A posted here for 100 days, and have 200 posts another guy B has posted here for 10 days, and have 100 posts guy A = 200/100 = 2.0 per day guy B = 100/10 = 10. per day ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.angelfire.com/apes/mi/filme___al_back_from_the_big_whoop_03.gif" border=0> <IMG SRC="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomimage.cgi?user=bigwhoop" border=0> <SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomtext.cgi?user=bigwhoop"></SCRIPT><P align="RIGHT">(hit F5)<P/> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest grannen Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Griswold 14.0 per day Natty 9.0 Grannen 8.3 Storken 6.7 (he was quiet for a while! ) Al-back.. 4.5 ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.grannen.com/Calvin.gif" border=0> <IMG SRC="http://www.grannen.com/Hobbes.gif" border=0> and Grannen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtBlanc Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Originally posted by Griswold: im sorry for causing such a mess....im sorry it wasnt my day back then..personal resons Thanks for apologizing Griswold. Let's start out on the right foot this time okay? Now, Al, you're not on my good side. Sure, perhaps I offended you. Unfortunately, I feel no remorse for the minimal offensive comments I made towards you. I am sorry for having to have posted such things about Griswold. He has apologized for what he has done. I respect that. You, on the other hand, take my thoughtout request and turn it into some declaration of war. I was posting why I was angry with you. Should bear reading some more of your spam or sifting through some more old topics you brought up? No! I'm going to do something about it, and that was to type that post. Now to my list: This is why you're still on my bad side. 1. You're attacking me, when I was just trying to defend Natty. Nice one Al. Real noble of you. 2. You take quotes out of context! "You and that Al guy seem to do this way too often." That was about bringing up old topics!! Not about complaining. At least argue intelligently, if you have to argue at all. The "Next, all you do is complain. Blah, blah, blah" is not even a real quote of mine. Sure I said all those things, but not in that order. Don't manipulate quotes! That's the worst thing I've ever seen someone do. Secondly, that quote was about Griswold! Not about you!! What's wrong with you? I'm not even pointing out a flaw of YOURS here. Settle down. Sheesh. 4. I did not complain about you bringing up old topics. If I don't like something, I'm going to show my disgust for it. Should I keep my mouth shut? No! Should I let you keep bringing back utterly useless topics? No! This is annoying! Please stop it! Furthermore, there is a vast difference between complaining and showing disgust or anger. I can be angry with you and not complain about your actions. Didn't I ask you to stop bringing up those old topics? Such a request is not complaining, but merely a request. 5. Why did you bring this up again? NiKo closed this topic, and you started a continuation of it? Oh, I'm glad you have respect for NiKo. I feel bad about posting in this topic, because it's like going behind NiKo's back and not respecting him. However, I am going to defend myself. If you have the balls to try to reply to this intellligently and eloquently, go ahead. But I hate arguing with people about such incredibly petty topics. I have better things to be doing. However, I'm not going to let someone like you keep insulting me behind my back for non-existant reasons. Whatever you have, I can take and dish back out in multitudes you wouldn't believe. So please, don't argue with me. Quoting the popular banner I have seen many places, and recently posted by brief in another topic: "Arguing on the internet is like the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded." Arguing is useless, please stop. Unfortunately, I'm such a stubborn individual that I will argue with you if you provoke me to do it. But please, unless you want to shown your own ignorance and your lack of general intelligence, please stop b*tching. However, if you want to take a shot at me, do so in an intelligent manner. So, as Brighty would say, "pull that stick out of your arse". It'll probably take you awhile. And by the way, just to show that I'm clear and level headed, unlike you (nice use of those emoticons), I will apologize for any offensive remarks made in my previous post or this one. I'm sorry. However, making comments like those seem to be the only way to get you to listen to me. ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.seanet.com/~osborn/sig.jpg" border=0> Right now, Dinghy Dog is <a href="http://www.imood.com/query.cgi?email=greg@osborn.seanet.com"><img src="http://www.imood.com/query.cgi?email=greg@osborn.seanet.com&type=1&fg=FFFFFF&bg=330060" alt="The current mood of greg@osborn.seanet.com"]border="0"></a> [This message has been edited by Dinghy Dog (edited November 02, 2001).] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted November 3, 2001 Author Share Posted November 3, 2001 Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: He has apologized for what he has done. I respect that. You, on the other hand, take my thoughtout request and turn it into some declaration of war. wot r u talkin about?! declaration of war? havnt i politelly apolagized in the first 20 times u annoyed me?! yes i did! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: 1. You're attacking me, when I was just trying to defend Natty. Nice one Al. Real noble of you. taht didnt happen, and u know it! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: 2. You take quotes out of context! "You and that Al guy seem to do this way too often." That was about bringing up old topics!! i know, my bad, i cut the quote too short. but i meant to say that it was about old topics. i wanted to show how u said to him stop complaining 100 times, and said to me stop bringing old topics 100 times. u manage to post "Al brings old topics" in every single topic, in every single forum?!?!?! dont u have a slight clue that that might have pissed me of?!?! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Not about complaining. At least argue intelligently theres just no need to say this. this was offensive and outta the context Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: The "Next, all you do is complain. Blah, blah, blah" is not even a real quote of mine. Sure I said all those things, but not in that order. Don't manipulate quotes! That's the worst thing I've ever seen someone do. U DID SAY TAHT! GO CHECK IT YOURSELF. THERE WAS SOME STUFF IN THE MIDDLE (and i pointed that by the italic "and")BUT THIS IS ACCURATE! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Secondly, that quote was about Griswold! Not about you!! What's wrong with you? I'm not even pointing out a flaw of YOURS here. Settle down. Sheesh. as i said b4, this was to show ur hipocracy, maybe the language ddnt help me to express it, maybe u didnt help. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: 4. I did not complain about you bringing up old topics. If I don't like something, I'm going to show my disgust for it. Should I keep my mouth shut? No! . say it, but say it once or twice, only when i do it, for chrissake! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Should I let you keep bringing back utterly useless topics? No! This is annoying! Please stop it! i did stop it. i brought only 2, and ive explained y 10000 times! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Furthermore, there is a vast difference between complaining and showing disgust or anger. I can be angry with you and not complain about your actions. Didn't I ask you to stop bringing up those old topics? Such a request is not complaining, but merely a request. its a request or showing disgust once or twice. 1000 wo a context is a complaint! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: 5. Why did you bring this up again? NiKo closed this topic, and you started a continuation of it? i was saying sorry to natty. then i thought to myself "dinghy missunderstood my acts and my explanation. im gonna try to settle this down. then i went going, because im obviously PISSED OFF! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Oh, I'm glad you have respect for NiKo. I feel bad about posting in this topic, because it's like going behind NiKo's back and not respecting him. However, I am going to defend myself. its not disrespect, as i said b4. bsides, its really dirty to "ask for niko's help like that"! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: If you have the balls to try to reply to this intellligently and eloquently, go ahead. bla bla bla, saying hes got better things to do then discuss w me and etc. So please, don't argue with me. ok then... Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Quoting the popular banner I have seen many places, and recently posted by brief in another topic: "Arguing on the internet is like the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded." i saw that, its pretty funny. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Arguing is useless, please stop. Unfortunately, I'm such a stubborn individual that I will argue with you if you provoke me to do it. funny u say that, i think U provoked ME w the 1000 complaints about my 2 ressurrected posts Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: But please, unless you want to shown your own ignorance and your lack of general intelligence, please stop b*tching. However, if you want to take a shot at me, do so in an intelligent manner. dinghy, despite the fact that u said that a thousand times, i ll reply: u r better than calling me ignorant wo me calling u names. if u think u r winning this argument by far (which looks like u think) remeber that bannner Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: So, as Brighty would say, "pull that stick out of your arse". It'll probably take you awhile thats not funny, thats just plagiating me! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: And by the way, just to show that I'm clear and level headed, unlike you (nice use of those emoticons), I will apologize for any offensive remarks made in my previous post or this one. I'm sorry. However, making comments like those seem to be the only way to get you to listen to me. apoligies accepted (unlike u) and i was thinking in re re re re apolagizing (all this re's show how many times ive apolagized), but your last remark made me take that back. at first i didnt like then i started to hate u now, for some reason, i pity u and if u wanna ban me. sure, go ahead. if thats how u wanna win... ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.angelfire.com/apes/mi/filme___al_back_from_the_big_whoop_03.gif" border=0> <IMG SRC="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomimage.cgi?user=bigwhoop" border=0> <SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomtext.cgi?user=bigwhoop"></SCRIPT><P align="RIGHT">(hit F5)<P/> [This message has been edited by Al-back from the BigWhoop (edited November 03, 2001).] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natty Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 OK, seems to me there's a few misunderstandings here, lets see if we can sort them out 1. Griswold posts waaaaaay too much, I don't have an objection with him posting lots, just as long as it's relevent and to the topic, and also not bringing up old topics to say 'ok' or something equally pointless. 2. Thankyou Dinghy for sticking up for me 3. I still don't get the average, but oh well, I just don't think you could come to an accurate conclusion about the average number number of posts someone has posted unless a. both people joined on the exact same time on the exact same day or b. you kept an accurate accounts of each persons posts from a particular date to another particular date. Still I'm not strong at maths, but that seems more logical to me that's all. 4. My brain is getting confuzzled, I'm waaaaaaay losted, I think the rest of it I'll leave to Dinghy and Al to sort out coz I so don't get it, so I'll wander off back to my cubby house and come back later ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://nattsy.homestead.com/files/disco.gif" border=0> Natty Is Feeling Very <IMG SRC="http://www.imood.com/query.cgi?email=nattydevil@optushome.com.au&type=1&fg=CC33F&bg=66CCFF" border=0> At This Present Time (Note Subject To Change Without Warning!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COJ Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Originally posted by Natty: 1. Griswold posts waaaaaay too much, I don't have an objection with him posting lots, just as long as it's relevent and to the topic, and also not bringing up old topics to say 'ok' or something equally pointless. excuse me but i did that ONCE!!!..i guess just enough to make u guys freak out ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.angelfire.com/ab6/griswold/M.gif" border=0> isnt he the coolest monkey??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natty Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 You've done it at least 3times, and each time we asked you to stop and you didn't. You're lucky you weren't banned, usually spammers and annoying people such as yourself get banned, did you know that? People have been banned on here for a lot less, infact, NiKo was banned once coz he wanted to see Le Chuck and Elaine do the wild thing, so that goes to show what people can be banned for. Usually we don't protest like people did in NiKo's case. You respect us, and we'll respect you in return, annoy us and you get what you deserve, abuse us, and well I don't need to say anymore ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://nattsy.homestead.com/files/disco.gif" border=0> Natty Is Feeling Very <IMG SRC="http://www.imood.com/query.cgi?email=nattydevil@optushome.com.au&type=1&fg=CC33F&bg=66CCFF" border=0> At This Present Time (Note Subject To Change Without Warning!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COJ Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 alright...but ive been saying sorry for atleast a while now..but u keep on bringing the subject back...NOW sorry and lets move on... ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.angelfire.com/ab6/griswold/M.gif" border=0> isnt he the coolest monkey??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest grannen Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Originally posted by Natty: ...... 3. I still don't get the average, but oh well, I just don't think you could come to an accurate conclusion about the average number number of posts someone has posted unless a. both people joined on the exact same time on the exact same day or b. you kept an accurate accounts of each persons posts from a particular date to another particular date. Still I'm not strong at maths, but that seems more logical to me that's all. Griswold registered 11 days ago and he has made 154 postings. That makes 154/11 postings per day, or 14.0 You have made 2787 postings during your 309 days making it to 9.0 per day. Griswold 14.0 Natty 9.0 Grannen 8.3 Storken 6.7 You get the info from respective profile re date and postings Griswold is our worst Spammer right from the beginning! ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.grannen.com/Calvin.gif" border=0> <IMG SRC="http://www.grannen.com/Hobbes.gif" border=0> and Grannen [This message has been edited by Grannen (edited November 03, 2001).] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 check me too ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://members.home.com/newfoundgloryboy/jack.jpg" border=0> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtBlanc Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Before I defend myself once again to further accusations, let's get these facts clear. -Al did in fact bring up old topics, just for the sake of bringing it up. There was no point to this, other than showing the date of the oldest post here. -Al is known for spamming. The majority of his recent posts have been nothing more than one word responses, which appear as if they should be in a chat room, not in these forums. I think we can all agree on those points. Al, you may be offended by the last one, but take some repsonsiblity. It's true. Now, here's where my own opinons come in. I'll start by (uggh) once again defending my self to the childish accusations and responses of Al. Regarding the Declaration of War response. Look what you have done based on one of my responses that wasn't even about you. This orginally started because of Griswold. The post was only about you in a couple places and those were petty qualms which you have made into large ones. Please only refer to parts of that response that were about yourself, and not Griswold. About the fact you claim you are not attacking me: Why did you start this topic then? Why did you bring up topics to piss me off? I believe your exact wording was "this'll piss Dinghy off " Isn't this true? I was defending Natty, you claimed she couldn't do second grade math, and I stuck up for her. Why didn't you just apologize and have gotten that over with? You were at fault, not myself for sticking up for one of the best forum-goers around here. About how I supposedly have complained 100 times: I responded negatively to both you and Griswold's bad posting once or twice. You are off by 50 times. I did not say "Al brings old topics" in every single topic or in every single forum. Please don't lie, or falsely accuse me of things. Once again, I was trying to alert you to my anger of the situation. You were the one who hoped that "this'll piss Dinghy off ", not me. About the fact that you aren't arguing intelligently: you are falsely accusing me of things I did not commit. Be intelligent and stick to the truth. You also said that I would resort to banning you to solve this. I would not stoop to such levels to have you banned. I don't know if that is something that you would do to solve this, I certainly won't get you banned. Please be intellligent and think out your responses. About my claim that you manipulated by quotes: I did say that. That's not what I am saying. What you have done is this: you took two things that I said seperatly and put them together to try to achieve a stronger arguement and make me look bad. If you are going to take things from seperate parts of my post use an ellipsis (...). This clears up confusion, and solves misquoting. Please use that in any further posts. What I am talking about is the "Next all you do is complain. Blah, blah, blah" portion, not the two lines there. I did not say "Blah, blah, blah" after "Next all you do is complain". Please quote me correctly. About me being a hypocrite: This isn't about you here. Don't use it as an arguement. This is included in my argue intellligently request. And if I were you I'd look up hypocripsy in a dictionary. I don't quite know how you are trying to use it here. If it's about the "you complained 100 times" nonsense, that's not true. I don't post as frequently as you do, nor do I reply in the majority of topics as you do. You know this is not true. If you present to me 100 posts in which I complain about you bringing up old topics and spamming, then you have an arguement here. Unfortunately, I never posted about you even 1/10 of that much, so you have no arguement. Once again, stop falsely accusing me of things. I'd appreciate it. About me wishing Al wouldn't post so much and bringing up old topics (again): this is my opinion, I'm allowed to convey it in my posts. In fact, I did say it once or twice. In all of my replies to all of the posts of yours I had qualms with. About you stopping bringing back old topics: And when exactly did you stop? Extremely recently I believe. You should know better than to bring up old topics, not only in the Harbor, but in the other forums as well. Secondly, I am not directly accusing you of it in that post, just stating my train of thought there. I think that's easy to see. I'm not saying you've recently done it. Please don't try to use that as an arguement, it is not valid. About me not using context: When I did not approve of your spamming, insulting other posters, or bringing back old topics, I told you about it in those topics, which is in complete context. Once again, I did explain that in my previous posts I was showing you my state of mind. Not directly accusing you of it. I hope this is clear. They were all in context. About you only saying sorry to Natty: this is nonsense. You were not only apologizing to Natty. To quote yourself there: "(whos the hypocrite now )" and "as brighty would say, "pull that stick out your arse." How is this involved in your apology to Natty? Please tell me. If there is anything I want to hear from you, it is your response to this. And you better have a good response too. About me having better things to do than discuss with you: No offense, but you aren't a celebrity or important person on a world-wide scale. I have many, many more important things than arguing with you about this. Would you like me to list them? About me provoking you: You provoked me by spamming, bringing up old topics, and insulting Natty. Furthermore, instead of apologizing, you tried to come up with some rationale for all of that. That provokes me. Am I supposed to keep quiet while you do all of those things? About be being ignorant or something: "U r better than calling me ignorant wo me calling u names" Do you know what b*tching means? It means complaining. I'm not calling you a name here. Plz. And I also ask you to remember the banner. About me being a "plagiatist" (original spelling retained for comedic effect): That's not funny eh? That's exactly what I said when you told it to me. And besides it's impossible to plagarize a quote that is referenced to its original owner. About how I supposedly don't accept apologies: "Thanks for apologizing Griswold. Let's start out on the right foot this time okay?" -Dinghy Dog lol, what do you have to say about that? Furthermore, you have not yet made an apology to me, so I have nothing to accept from you. Clearly, I have accepted Griswold's apology, I'll accept yours when you make one. Please quote yourself where you made an apology to me. I'm expecting to see such a quote in your next response. Your worst accusation of them all: "its not disrespect, as i said b4. bsides, its really dirty to "ask for niko's help like that"!" I did not ask for NiKo's help. He closed that topic without talking to me. Don't blindly accuse me of such things. Please, in your next response, I'd like to see some facts. If you're going to accuse me of things, at least make sure they are factual. Your arguement up to now is structured around lies. Not one of your accusations can be backed up by fact. So please, I'll be waiting for that on your next post. Wrongfully accusing me of things is childish, and it's not intelligent in any way, shape or form. Can't you see now why I claimed you weren't arguing intelligently? I sure hope you end this soon. These forums are supposed to be fun. By insulting forum goers, bringing up old topics and spamming, (both of which you have been alerted to) you are being generally annoying. I wish these forums would be fun for us all. So, if you'd like to apologize, for insulting me, wrongfully accusing me of many, many things, bringing up old topics, insulting other forum-goers and your spamming, you can do so and I won't look down on you in any way. I am really trying to be respectful of you, but you must understand it is very hard with the ways you respond to my comments. Once again, if you are offended personally by any of these comments in this post, I apologize. ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.seanet.com/~osborn/sig.jpg" border=0> Right now, Dinghy Dog is <a href="http://www.imood.com/query.cgi?email=greg@osborn.seanet.com"><img src="http://www.imood.com/query.cgi?email=greg@osborn.seanet.com&type=1&fg=FFFFFF&bg=330060" alt="The current mood of greg@osborn.seanet.com"]border="0"></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brief Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Originally posted by Jack: check me too Just take a look at your own profile... You registered May 28, 2001. That means at the time of this posting, you've been here 159 days. You have 361 posts. So our division reveals: Jack -- 2.27 posts per day (average) Taking a look at my own, which, with this post, will make my post total 1099. Been registered here since Nov. 10, 2000. That makes 358 days. My average: 3.07 posts per day. ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.capcorphq.com/images/brief.gif" border=0> "He's looking at me like I'm a chicken! I'm not a chicken! Okay, I'm a chicken... but I'm not a chicken." --Rachel Leigh Cook, Celebrity Adventures Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HelenW Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 I only post half of a post a day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feral Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 Al, I think you should accept that you are in the wrong here. Dinghy is merely pointing out that sometimes youcan be annoying with your spam. Your rate is 4.5 posts a day; mine is only 2.3 posts a day, including this one. While that isn't a lot, you also have to remember that you were absent for two-three months. Taking this into account, your post rate is 5.8. While this still isn't much, about 4 a day are either incomprehensible or spam. Just look at your post amount; 1093 at the time of this post, wheras I, one of the longest standing board members, have 1110 including this post. While it's true that other have more than me despite having been registered a shorter peroid, most are people like Grannen who post in the Clues & Hints section. You just needlessly spam around The Harbour like a bumblebee with it's arse on fire. I believe that that is what Dinghy is getting at. ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://deparmentofdeath.homestead.com/files/Feralchicken.jpg" border=0> <IMG SRC="http://www.imood.com/query.cgi?email=the_feral_chicken@hotmail.com&type=1&fg=FFFFFF&bg=330066" border=0> Is it just me, or does 'Virgin Megastore' sound like a Porn Shop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiKo Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 just a little warning, keep this argument civilized! ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://deparmentofdeath.homestead.com/files/NiKlogo.JPG" border=0> Top 10 things men know about women. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Women have boobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
storken Posted November 3, 2001 Share Posted November 3, 2001 It's all my fault! ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://nattsy.homestead.com/files/storken2.jpg" border=0> "the storks are listening" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted November 3, 2001 Author Share Posted November 3, 2001 Originally posted by Feral: Al, I think you should accept that you are in the wrong here. Dinghy is merely pointing out that sometimes youcan be annoying with your spam. Your rate is 4.5 posts a day; mine is only 2.3 posts a day, including this one. While that isn't a lot, you also have to remember that you were absent for two-three months. Taking this into account, your post rate is 5.8. While this still isn't much, about 4 a day are either incomprehensible or spam. Just look at your post amount; 1093 at the time of this post, wheras I, one of the longest standing board members, have 1110 including this post. While it's true that other have more than me despite having been registered a shorter peroid, most are people like Grannen who post in the Clues & Hints section. You just needlessly spam around The Harbour like a bumblebee with it's arse on fire. I believe that that is what Dinghy is getting at. b4 replying, i must remind u that i have nothing against u. there, now let me defend mself: 1-i post in EVERY topic here 2-i far from veing one of the highest avarages here, i dont know how can u accuse that. griswold, niko, natty grannen, storken (that has been absent for a lot of days now), they all have higher avarages, sdo i dont see how u use that as proof. if u call me spammer, your calling all of them spammers too. 3-Dinghy managed to say "Al spamms" in everysingle topic there is. i dont see how tis is merelly point that sometimes i can annoy w spamm. 4-if u see my replies as usless spam, i dont. if i reply, its because i think its appropriate, im much more responsible than many ppl in this forum, starting from i dont live w my parents, so i think i need to b responsible right? ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.angelfire.com/apes/mi/filme___al_back_from_the_big_whoop_03.gif" border=0> <IMG SRC="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomimage.cgi?user=bigwhoop" border=0> <SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomtext.cgi?user=bigwhoop"></SCRIPT><P align="RIGHT">(hit F5)<P/> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted November 3, 2001 Author Share Posted November 3, 2001 holdon, im havig troubles replying (i get 404 or 500 errors) [This message has been edited by Al-back from the BigWhoop (edited November 03, 2001).] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted November 4, 2001 Author Share Posted November 4, 2001 Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Before I defend myself once again to further accusations, let's get these facts clear. -Al did in fact bring up old topics, just for the sake of bringing it up. There was no point to this, other than showing the date of the oldest post here. u cant say i brought them (2, i must remind u all)for the sake of bringing them up AND because i was looking for the oldest date. bsides, when i brought them, ppl said "cool"and "wow". u were the only one having a stroke. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: -Al is known for spamming. The majority of his recent posts have been nothing more than one word responses, which appear as if they should be in a chat room, not in these forums. as i said in the post b4, if i feel that my reply is appropriated, i ll post there. for chrissake, in my belief, my replies were appropriate. ill try to be more critic, but one can see you reply of "Al spamms" in every topic might be seen as spamming to! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: I think we can all agree on those points. Al, you may be offended by the last one, but take some repsonsiblity. It's true. i dont agree in those points ive said "sorry" and "ill try to b more critic" all the first 100 times u annoyed me. after all that, i exploded OBVIOUSLY! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Now, here's where my own opinons come in. I'll start by (uggh) once again defending my self to the childish accusations and responses of Al. funny u say my accusations are childish. I think UR accusations are childish. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Regarding the Declaration of War response. ive told u 100 times (i think ill have to get used ) its not a declaration of war for godsake! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Look what you have done based on one of my responses that wasn't even about you. if i has my name, its about me Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: This orginally started because of Griswold. The post was only about you in a couple places and those were petty qualms which you have made into large ones. Please only refer to parts of that response that were about yourself, and not Griswold. as i said b4, i was at first defendint griswold. then u took advantage of the situation to "remind" everyone of wot became your catch frase "Al spamms and brings old topics". i put your replies about griswold to SHOW YOUR HIPOCRACY. wot part of "show ur hipocracy" dont u understand? Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About the fact you claim you are not attacking me: Why did you start this topic then? *sigh*. im not gonna explain again. u go look in the other reply! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Why did you bring up topics to piss me off? I believe your exact wording was "this'll piss Dinghy off " let me put u apar of the happenings. this was b4 u post in every single topic "Al spams" so i didnt know we hated each other. i think it was Zero that said he had an older one. then i said "i coulnd find it. show us, it will be fun. bsides, this is gonna piss Dinghy off " must i say anything else Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Isn't this true? I was defending Natty, you claimed she couldn't do second grade math so i didnt. u missunderstood me. afraid of natty missunderstanding me too, i apologized to her. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: and I stuck up for her. Why didn't you just apologize and have gotten that over with? You were at fault, not myself for sticking up for one of the best forum-goers around here. U FUKING BROWN-NOSED COWARD! STOP ASKING FOR OTHER PPL HELP! first niko and now natty! wots wrong w u i said i was sorry to both already! ((((im having trouble to reply, so ill try replying in parts. part 2 is comming up)))) ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.angelfire.com/apes/mi/filme___al_back_from_the_big_whoop_03.gif" border=0> <IMG SRC="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomimage.cgi?user=bigwhoop" border=0> <SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomtext.cgi?user=bigwhoop"></SCRIPT><P align="RIGHT">(hit F5)<P/> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted November 4, 2001 Author Share Posted November 4, 2001 ((((heres part 2)))) Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About how I supposedly have complained 100 times: I responded negatively to both you and Griswold's bad posting once or twice. You are off by 50 times. dinghy, i wouldnt REPLY 50 times if u had said that only 2, because reply in the dictionary means: respond to or about one particula (emphasis on ONE PARTICULAR) question or point. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: I did not say "Al brings old topics" in every single topic or in every single forum. Please don't lie, or falsely accuse me of things. u said taht in many topics. everysingle topic is a way of saying, an expression, u poor thing u. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Once again, I was trying to alert you to my anger of the situation. You were the one who hoped that "this'll piss Dinghy off ", not me. ive replied to that 10000 times already. are u reading wot i write?!?! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About the fact that you aren't arguing intelligently: you are falsely accusing me of things I did not commit. Be intelligent and stick to the truth. ive ALSO replied that a 1000 times. sheesh! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: You also said that I would resort to banning you to solve this. I would not stoop to such levels to have you banned. I don't know if that is something that you would do to solve this, I certainly won't get you banned. Please be intellligent and think out your responses. i didnt say u WERE going to ban me. i was just reminding u how easy it would be to ban me, but how ugly. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About my claim that you manipulated by quotes: I did say that. That's not what I am saying. What you have done is this: you took two things that I said seperatly and put them together to try to achieve a stronger arguement and make me look bad. preciselly. let me put it this way: i say green is pretty. i say 100 lines of another thing i say green is pretty. if some quote everything it wouldnt be as ovious if someone quoted: green is ugly and green is pretty understand now? Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: If you are going to take things from seperate parts of my post use an ellipsis (...). and has the same effect Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: This clears up confusion, and solves misquoting. Please use that in any further posts. What I am talking about is the "Next all you do is complain. Blah, blah, blah" portion, not the two lines there. I did not say "Blah, blah, blah" after "Next all you do is complain". Please quote me correctly. im not gonna reply to that again ((((part 3 commming up)))) ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.angelfire.com/apes/mi/filme___al_back_from_the_big_whoop_03.gif" border=0> <IMG SRC="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomimage.cgi?user=bigwhoop" border=0> <SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript" SRC="http://members.hostedscripts.com/randomtext.cgi?user=bigwhoop"></SCRIPT><P align="RIGHT">(hit F5)<P/> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al-back from the BigWhoop Posted November 4, 2001 Author Share Posted November 4, 2001 ((((part 3)))) Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About me being a hypocrite: This isn't about you here. u said "Al is a hypocrite". suddenly its not about me anymore? anyone called al heere? dont think so. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: And if I were you I'd look up hypocripsy in a dictionary. i did. maybe U r the one that needs to look it in the dictionary Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: I don't quite know how you are trying to use it here. If it's about the "you complained 100 times" nonsense, that's not true. im using it like this: u said griswold complained 1000 times. then u complainted about me for the 1000th time. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: I don't post as frequently as you do, nor do I reply in the majority of topics as you do. You know this is not true. so u dont, but so wot? that doesnt make u sacred, nor stop u for being a hipocrite. please, U r the one that need to reply inteligently. have u noticed that many quotes in this reply were already answered or have no meaning? Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: If you present to me 100 posts in which I complain about you bringing up old topics and spamming, then you have an arguement here. Unfortunately, I never posted about you even 1/10 of that much, so you have no arguement. Once again, stop falsely accusing me of things. I'd appreciate it. ok, ill look for them. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About me wishing Al wouldn't post so much and bringing up old topics (again): this is my opinion, I'm allowed to convey it in my posts. In fact, I did say it once or twice. In all of my replies to all of the posts of yours I had qualms with. OH MY GOD, I REPLIED TO THAT ALREADY! OPEN YOUR EYES AND CLOSE YOUR MOUTH! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About you stopping bringing back old topics: And when exactly did you stop? Extremely recently I believe. i must remind u (again) that i brought 2 because i was looking for the oldest topic (and that a motive! go look for motive in the dictionary) Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: You should know better than to bring up old topics, not only in the Harbor, but in the other forums as well. link them, then u will have a point Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Secondly, I am not directly accusing you of it in that post, no, u were indirecly accusing me. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: I'm not saying you've recently done it.about bringing up old topics Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About you stopping bringing back old topics: And when exactly did you stop? Extremely recently I believe [chanting]careful dinghy, ur contradicting yourself[/c] Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About me not using context: this was for a part of your reply only Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About you only saying sorry to Natty: this is nonsense. You were not only apologizing to Natty. To quote yourself there: "(whos the hypocrite now )" and "as brighty would say, "pull that stick out your arse." How is this involved in your apology to Natty? Please tell me. If there is anything I want to hear from you, it is your response to this. And you better have a good response too. as i said b4 (again this sentence!!!)i was saying sorry for natty, then i started w u because i was extremelly annoyed. then i went crazy. i hate u, that was expected! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About me having better things to do than discuss with you: No offense, but you aren't a celebrity or important person on a world-wide scale. I have many, many more important things than arguing with you about this. Would you like me to list them? u R arguing w me... Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About me provoking you: You provoked me by spamming, bringing up old topics each of us has a diffrent view Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: and insulting Natty. who r u tring to fool, "honorable savior"? gimme a break ok? no ones falling for that Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Furthermore, instead of apologizing, you tried to come up with some rationale for all of that. That provokes me. Am I supposed to keep quiet while you do all of those things? ok, now i know. u DONT read wot i write Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About be being ignorant or something: "U r better than calling me ignorant wo me calling u names" Do you know what b*tching means? It means complaining. I'm not calling you a name here. YES U R! U ARE CALLING ME IGNORANT, DUMB, IRRESPONSABLE, AND ETC. NOW I THINK U DONT READ WHAT U WRITE! Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About me being a "plagiatist" (original spelling retained for comedic effect) and in relation to wot i said in the quote b4, now u r making fun of me not having english as a 1st language. Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About me being a "plagiatist" (original spelling retained for comedic effect): That's not funny eh? That's exactly what I said when you told it to me. And besides it's impossible to plagarize a quote that is referenced to its original owner.) u plagarized because u didnt even come up w a better comeback or quote. u fuking used the same QUOTE as i. wots wrog w u? Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: About how I supposedly don't accept apologies: "Thanks for apologizing Griswold. Let's start out on the right foot this time okay?" -Dinghy Dog lol, what do you have to say about that? i have to say that u accepet HIS appologies, not mine. that doesnt prove anythig <IMG SRC="http://www.escapemi.com/forums/smilies/cwm27.gif" border=0> Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Furthermore, you have not yet made an apology to me, only in the first 1000 complaints Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: so I have nothing to accept from you. Clearly, I have accepted Griswold's apology, I'll accept yours when you make one. Please quote yourself where you made an apology to me. I'm expecting to see such a quote in your next response. ill reply first, and look for those later, if its ok w u Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: your worst accusation of them all: "its not disrespect, as i said b4. bsides, its really dirty to "ask for niko's help like that"!" I did not ask for NiKo's help. He closed that topic without talking to me. Don't blindly accuse me of such things. u cleary asked for niko's help when u said :"u r disrespecting niko", expecting niko to b dumb enough to stand by u Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Please, in your next response, I'd like to see some facts. If you're going to accuse me of things, at least make sure they are factual. Your arguement up to now is structured around lies. Not one of your accusations can be backed up by fact. So please, I'll be waiting for that on your next post. u havnt showed me any more facts tehn i showed to u. thoguh i promised that ill look for the topics them Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: Wrongfully accusing me of things is childish, and it's not intelligent in any way, shape or form. Can't you see now why I claimed you weren't arguing intelligently? "im trying to see from your perspective, but i can put my head that far up in my arse"-Natty Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: I sure hope you end this soon. These forums are supposed to be fun. By insulting forum goers, bringing up old topics and spamming, (both of which you have been alerted to) you are being generally annoying. I wish these forums would be fun for us all. oh mighty savior. stop bul****ing! as i said b4, i dont think IM ruining the forum. i think U r ruining it. but tahts an opinion (although i see that u tend to think uour opinions are facts) Originally posted by Dinghy Dog: So, if you'd like to apologize, for insulting me, wrongfully accusing me of many, many things, bringing up old topics, insulting other forum-goers and your spamming, you can do so and I won't look down on you in any way. I am really trying to be respectful of you, but you must understand it is very hard with the ways you respond to my comments. Once again, if you are offended personally by any of these comments in this post, I apologize. sorry, i dont think u r tring to be respectfull and despite the fact that ive apoligized 1000 and i think im right, i apologize. ... ok, u know what: this is ridiculous. we r kicking the dead dog. lets try it like this, short and direct, wo any accusations: "dinghy, for reasosn ive already explaing, i brought 2 topics back. that seem to have annoyed u and u, in my point of view, started saying everywhere that i brought old topics and i spammed and etc. that in particular annoyed me. when u included me in a fight that wasnt even mine. i exploded. i tried to ignore, and i was saying sorry for natty, but i failed in holding myself. im sorry for all the annoyance i caused to u, as much as i hope u are for the the annoyance u caused to me, and im ready to start again." now u try: [This message has been edited by Al-back from the BigWhoop (edited November 03, 2001).] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtBlanc Posted November 4, 2001 Share Posted November 4, 2001 Obviously, you like contradicting me without adding any facts. All your argument is is a contradiction of mine. If I say "You spammed", you change it to "I didn't spam". Wow, very intelligent. Secondly, you claim I post 1000 times to every topic. I only posted once or twice asking you to stop. If I did post 1000 times about something you did. Show me. Please, for the love of God, show me. This is all I'm asking. I don't like arguing with you. You don't bring up anything new. Secondly, you only contradict me here. If you can find any evidence whatsoever to prove your side of the arguement, show me. That's what I asked for in my last post. I want to see evidence. Also, what do other people think about Al? Is he somewhat justified for his claims, or is he truly annoying and should he apologize to the whole forums? I started this argument at the request of others. Let's hear what everyone else has to say. We obviously know what Al has already repeated a total of 4 times. In the mean time, I'm still waiting on those posts you said you'd find for me Al. You better find them too, because as of now you are quite uncreditable. Please find them about me posting 1000 times about you. I'd like to see everyone of them. Also, please quote me in my post in the Habbo Hotel topic, if you'd like to make those allegations against me. In the mean time, I won't even consider apologizing to you. By the way, I don't hate you Al. Can't you see I am showing you respect by not insulting you, as you do to me? I love you Al. I wish you'd just see my side of the arguement. When you post those posts of mine Al, then I will continue, I'm still waiting on you. ------------------ <IMG SRC="http://www.seanet.com/~osborn/sig.jpg" border=0> Right now, Dinghy Dog is <a href="http://www.imood.com/query.cgi?email=greg@osborn.seanet.com"><img src="http://www.imood.com/query.cgi?email=greg@osborn.seanet.com&type=1&fg=FFFFFF&bg=330060" alt="The current mood of greg@osborn.seanet.com"]border="0"></a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.