Giant Graffiti Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 What you were saying is that if someone wanted to include a planet that had already "appeared" in one of the games, they shouldn't. So then if they had wanted to do M4-78 they should stretch the story to fit a different setting? Or cut it and have everyone promote it again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCarter426 Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 What you were saying is that if someone wanted to include a planet that had already "appeared" in one of the games, they shouldn't. No, I said they shouldn't have it appear just for the sake of having it appear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giant Graffiti Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 ^^^ Let's say we're looking for Rimrods in K3, but suppose I have to go to Manaan again because there's a Rimrod there. Would you say they should've done a different planet?Yes. I wouldn't say that would be putting it in there just for it to appear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Foley Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 No, I said they shouldn't have it appear just for the sake of having it appear. But what he's saying is that it's not a bad thing to use the same planet again if you have a legitimate reason to go to the planet again, ie, if Selkath themselves are part of the K3 story, you should go to Manaan. I do agree with you on the point that they shouldn't reuse planets just because they can, but there's nothing wrong with seeing a familiar place or two. It makes the series feel more connected, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts