Lord JayVizIon Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 leon, that blue thing is an imperial battle droid from ESB, if i'm not mistaken. i'm thinking either they are the imperial villagers/workers or as spies/scouts as they were in the movie........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paragon_Leon Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 yeah, now i'm looking at the picture and i see your avatar is a bit misformed.. it's supposed to be a bit broader, but there you have it.. what kind of techs do you people think an ATAT will have as upgrades ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthfergie Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 Well if you've seen my screenshot I just posted I think it upgrades to a full fledged At-At at one point. If you didn't see it go to... Unit deaths discussion... I think:atat: :atat: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord JayVizIon Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 a bit misinformed leon? geezzzzz:band: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paragon_Leon Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 hehe... that wasn't my question. So you have an ATAT. now what upgrades can you research for it ? think about it: Heavier lasers ? Armor ? be creative... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kvan Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 Originally posted by Paragon_Leon hehe... that wasn't my question. So you have an ATAT. now what upgrades can you research for it ? think about it: Heavier lasers ? Armor ? be creative... ....better sensors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthfergie Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 Why better sensors for the At-At? Why not for At-Pt or AT-St Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paragon_Leon Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 could be for all three. i'm just trying to stir up some thought about the actual tech tree.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kvan Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 Originally posted by darthfergie Why better sensors for the At-At? Why not for At-Pt or AT-St Cause.....the ATAT is taller and not as much stuff gets in the way of the sensors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord JayVizIon Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 i was just kidding leon. if i had to imagine, the upgrades for the AT'S would be as follows: better armor/shields sensors longer range for blasters probably more powerful blasters that's about it maybe. i doubt speed is b/c how can you increase the speed of something that big anyways...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paragon_Leon Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 i got the joke, Jay.. but i still wanted to know about the techs. i think of that mega-laser they used to destroy the shield-generator on Hoth.. that sounds like one to research.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthfergie Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 Hey, Lord JayVizIon Your aviator would look a bit better if it didn't show where the gun is through the entire ship. Luckly this is an early pic. by PcGamer or I would be worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tie Guy Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 And it doesn't have good resolution, as you see it very close, much closer than it was meant to be. If you saw it on screen i'm sure it would look better. You're right though, i think the screens in PC Gamer were from the pre-redesigned era of artwork. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darthfergie Posted August 5, 2001 Share Posted August 5, 2001 yes I have that PcGamer and they were deffinatly pre design. pre E3 actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.