Guest roach Posted December 12, 2001 Posted December 12, 2001 Surely it is a bit strange to be able to fit multiple AT-AT's in a transport about 1/5 the size of a single one...
duder Posted December 12, 2001 Posted December 12, 2001 you can only fit 5 men in a transport, yet you can fit 15 or so in a assault mech, and fit 5 assault mechs in a transport!!! therfore yo9u get get pretty muchan entire army into one transport, which as you sayis about 1/5 the size of an at-at! dumbass designers or wot?
Paragon_Leon Posted December 12, 2001 Posted December 12, 2001 If you take all things too literally, the size of ATAT's themselves are still off, too. The thing is, scaling can never be totally right with an RTS like this. You need to have a clear view of your army at all times, which demands some compromises in scaling.
Com Raven Posted December 12, 2001 Posted December 12, 2001 YOu can't put more than 5 units into one transport, so not even ONE AT-AT with troops on board will work ...
Chessack Posted December 12, 2001 Posted December 12, 2001 Originally posted by Paragon_Leon If you take all things too literally, the size of ATAT's themselves are still off, too. The thing is, scaling can never be totally right with an RTS like this. You need to have a clear view of your army at all times, which demands some compromises in scaling. Agreed. But it is kind of funny to watch AT-STs debarking an air transport. It puts me in mind of those clown acts where 15 or 20 clowns appear from inside a VW Bug. May the Force be with you.
Tie Guy Posted December 12, 2001 Posted December 12, 2001 Actually, landing bares are VERY large in "reality." Still, you woudn't be able to fit 5 ATATs in one, but they are much big than they look. Anotehr thing, units inside of other units shouldn't count towards the capacity. Its not like they are taking up more room than the transport could hold with the unloaded units anyways.
Guest Supreme Warlord Posted December 12, 2001 Posted December 12, 2001 Who cares about the size or loading troops in it is "unrealistic" .Star Wars is not relistic and yet we love it. ENJOY THE GAME! dont worry about the size...It is almost impossible to make it the right size in the game. kick back and move the mouse to kick somebody butt.
lord_adelgard Posted December 12, 2001 Posted December 12, 2001 I completely agree with thrawn...sorry supreme warlord: Just enjoy the game! In that case where do they come from all those soldiers in the troop center? Don't tell me that they make babies who grow up so quickly!!(besides...where are the mother )
Zygomaticus Posted December 13, 2001 Posted December 13, 2001 yeah rts games arent always realistic also does a unit eat food only for once when hes made and never eat food again? have u ever heard of arrows being able to fell a castle that is unrealistic stuff will be unrealistic if u want a realistic game where people eat all the time and there are mothers for the people, and arrows cant break walls or castles play STRONGHOLD
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.