Steg Posted June 15, 2002 Share Posted June 15, 2002 XP is a right bitch when it comes to tweaking ur hardware i got so pissed off with XP Pro for taking away all my control and doing it automaticly and it is so incredebly slow comapred 2 98 that i went bac 2 98 after less than a week Steg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuietSith Posted June 15, 2002 Share Posted June 15, 2002 Originally posted by Steg XP is a right bitch when it comes to tweaking ur hardware i got so pissed off with XP Pro for taking away all my control and doing it automaticly and it is so incredebly slow comapred 2 98 that i went bac 2 98 after less than a week Steg You went from a very stable platform to one that is generally not supported anymore. Sounds like you needed some hardware upgrades if you needed to do 'that much' tweaking - imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedantic Posted June 15, 2002 Share Posted June 15, 2002 Originally posted by normal You guys complain waaay too much, I get 10-25 FPS in 640x480. Do I complain about that? No, because it really dosn't bother me. You guys should learn to appreciate what you do have. Where'd ya dig up that old fossil? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
normal Posted June 15, 2002 Share Posted June 15, 2002 Originally posted by Pedantic Where'd ya dig up that old fossil? If you mean my video card, it's an on-board piece of ****.. If you mean anything else, what are you referring to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedantic Posted June 15, 2002 Share Posted June 15, 2002 Yeah, I was talking about the video card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ah Boon Posted June 15, 2002 Share Posted June 15, 2002 i just got that nvidia refresh rate fix ver 1.12e. so, how do i use it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ah Boon Posted June 16, 2002 Share Posted June 16, 2002 ^bump^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ah Boon Posted June 16, 2002 Share Posted June 16, 2002 ^bump^ again for one last time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daver Hacker Posted June 18, 2002 Author Share Posted June 18, 2002 Originally posted by normal If you mean my video card, it's an on-board piece of ****.. If you mean anything else, what are you referring to? You cant really moan, your onboard video card was made for displaying games like Solitare and Minesweeper, not JediKnight 2. I am not complaining, just comparing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C'jais Posted June 18, 2002 Share Posted June 18, 2002 Just a question: Why do everyone prefer to have an enormous resolution? I run in 640X480 for multi and 800X600 for singleplayer, but I can't really understand these "resolution-junkies" who insist on running in the highest possible resolution. To *me*, the difference is negligible and I can't be bothered to raise my res., just to see a decrease in FPS. Extremely silly IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ah Boon Posted June 18, 2002 Share Posted June 18, 2002 i dun like tiny looking graphics neither so, i ran jk2 on 800x600 because it feels good. btw, call me a wuss but i actually enjoy playing jk2 in window mode so that my mom couldnt see me playing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi wannabe Posted June 18, 2002 Share Posted June 18, 2002 I get 20-25 no enemies and got to 5 with enemies and then 10 when outside 1 enemy I get 1 and you get the point. This is on the fastest setting and I have a GeForce2 MX400, It was the best I could get at the time and I only had little money at the time. I'm 13 live in the UK and was in a rush to get a new graphics card because i got JK2 the very first day it was out at a bout 9:30 am and I realised I did not have a sutible graphics card to play it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ah Boon Posted June 18, 2002 Share Posted June 18, 2002 jedi wannabe, u are lying arent u? its impossible to get fps of 5 with enemies. i have geforce2 mx 400 too and i get fps around 25 with 30 desanns or tavions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mInk3nine Posted June 18, 2002 Share Posted June 18, 2002 p4 1.6@2.4Ghz, 256MB MushkinDDR CAS222, geForce3 ti200 128MB i just ran a timedemo using the JK2FFA demo with , 32bit color-depth, 32bit textures, trilinear filtering, and shaders on, and anti-aliasing off. 1280x1024 - 99.1 1024x768 - 120.5 800x600 - 122.7 and thats with mirc and trillian logged onto aim, icq and yahoo msger, and 3 internet explorer windows open... heres what i got when i shut everything down... 1280x1024 - 101.5 1024x768 - 121.5 800x600 - 123.1 not a very noticable difference. so only if you have something under 1 gig i'd say close everything down before you play, otherwise its really not necessary... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deaded Posted June 18, 2002 Share Posted June 18, 2002 GeForce 4 4600 Asus A7m266-D with dual Athlon 1800+ MP processors SB Audigy Platinum EX 1 gig ECC DDR 2100 RAM Running multiplayer at 1280x1024 with V-sync on and hosting 2 or 3 players I'm getting FPS's in the high 90's on most maps. I've seen it drop down to the 80's but not below that. Everything is turned on except EAX and trails. Usually there are a few things going on in the background and I often leave some browser windows open, and an email client but I think that the other processor keeps those under control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reiver Posted June 19, 2002 Share Posted June 19, 2002 Originally posted by cjais Just a question: Why do everyone prefer to have an enormous resolution? I run in 640X480 for multi and 800X600 for singleplayer, but I can't really understand these "resolution-junkies" who insist on running in the highest possible resolution. To *me*, the difference is negligible and I can't be bothered to raise my res., just to see a decrease in FPS. Extremely silly IMHO. I for one, use higher resolutions, because since I got a big monitor, at higher resolutions, the game runs faster than in lower due to the refresh rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-=[M@ximus]=- Posted June 19, 2002 Share Posted June 19, 2002 T/bird 1gig 640 Meg ram 133 GeForce 2 MX400 (64meg) KT7 M/B 1024x768 Win XP i get on average 20-40 but i would love too boost this if you can help if anyone knows where to find that thing, where you can alocate Ram to JO, or anything else please let me know i have Sync off, Colour set at 16 and Texture set at 32 i just done the seta com_maxfps "100" just too make sure umm cant think of anything else give us a hand i would like if poss too make it too at least 40-50 i would be happy at that, never mind those 90+ gits cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deetox187 Posted June 19, 2002 Share Posted June 19, 2002 Originally posted by Reiver I for one, use higher resolutions, because since I got a big monitor, at higher resolutions, the game runs faster than in lower due to the refresh rate. No game runs better in high resolutions than it does in lower resolutions, the higher you go the more video bandwidth you use up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtrixman Posted June 19, 2002 Share Posted June 19, 2002 where can i download 3d mark? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ah Boon Posted June 19, 2002 Share Posted June 19, 2002 Originally posted by -=[M@ximus]=- T/bird 1gig 640 Meg ram 133 GeForce 2 MX400 (64meg) KT7 M/B 1024x768 Win XP i get on average 20-40 but i would love too boost this if you can help hello max! I hope wut i am gonna tell u soon might help. look at my sig and u will know that my system is similiar to urs except the RAM and the processor. I get and fps around 60-80 fps averagely on MP and 80-100fps in single player. Here are my configs:- Video Config 800x600 res 16 bit colours 32 bit textures TRILINEAR Shades On and the rest set to high More video Config VSync Off The rest on. thats all for my system config and btw, i turned on EAX too. Originally posted by mtrixman where can i download 3d mark? Ya can get it from madonions.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mInk3nine Posted June 19, 2002 Share Posted June 19, 2002 http://gamershq.madonion.com/download/?3dmark2001.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi wannabe Posted June 19, 2002 Share Posted June 19, 2002 Don't beleive me. I'll get some screenshots as soon as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtrixman Posted June 19, 2002 Share Posted June 19, 2002 what was the command to show fps again? i forgot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homosexual Ewok Posted June 19, 2002 Share Posted June 19, 2002 For those of you who did not play Quake 3 or are not too familiar with the Quake 3 console I suggest going here for the basics: http://keen.gameadmins.com/variables.html And here: http://keen.gameadmins.com/commands.html For tweaking and high performance go here: http://keen.gameadmins.com/tweaking.html 99% of that stuff still applies to Jedi Outcast. Even though I run a high performance machine, I still do a little tweaking so that when I do end up in a server with 30 guys running around blasting everything in sight I maintain a high frame rate with 0 slow down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ah Boon Posted June 19, 2002 Share Posted June 19, 2002 Originally posted by mtrixman what was the command to show fps again? i forgot the command is cg_drawfps 1 and jedi, read my last past cause it says sumthing about configuring ur res and stuff like that so that ur gf3 can get kick a.s.s. fps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.