darth_kuat Posted July 17, 2004 Share Posted July 17, 2004 The jerk has caused more damage to America than Clinton ever could. Any fool who supports this creep is a partisan stooge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Jones Posted July 17, 2004 Share Posted July 17, 2004 err.. pardon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Sitherino Posted July 17, 2004 Share Posted July 17, 2004 ... as much as I dislike Bush, this is just stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinWalker Posted July 17, 2004 Share Posted July 17, 2004 I don't necessarily disagree with your statement that Bush is an idiot if we're talking about the colloquial sense of the word and not the literal, since "idiot" refers to someone of less than 70 IQ. Clearly, Bush's IQ is higher than this. Perhaps as high as 90. However, I'd like to see why you think he's a colloquial "idiot." Wouldn't that make for a more interesting thread? Indeed, you might consider reading the to ensure that the topic hasn't already been covered ad nauseum or to elaborate on some point made there. Don't overlook the parent thread of that one either, George W. Bush: Pros & Cons (Part I). For this thread to continue, it'll need to focus on Bush as an "Idiot," or a person of subnormal intelligence. Counter-arguments are welcome, but first I would suggest that the initial statement that "Bush is an idiot" be supported. Ironically, the etymology of the word idiot is from the Greek expressions "a priest or an idiot" (layman), "a poet or an idiot" (prose-writer), and originally meant a private person or one not engaged in public office. So "Bush is an idiot" could be construed as an accurate assessment if one could demonstrate that he is not engaged appropriately in his elected position or that he is really a layman who's bitten off far more than he can chew. Moderator note: I deleted your (darth_kuat) other two posts for two reasons. 1) they were redundant and you started an entire thread on the subject; 2) at least one, if not both, didn't relate enough to the topic of the threads they were in. If you have a problem with this, please PM me. [align=right]-- SkinWalker[/align] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darth_kuat Posted July 18, 2004 Author Share Posted July 18, 2004 "There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says fool me once... shame on... shame on you. Uh... fool me, you can't get fooled again." -- George W. Bush You're right Dumbya, we won't be fooled again! KERRY/EDWARDS 2004! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toms Posted July 21, 2004 Share Posted July 21, 2004 did you just watch F9/11 by any chance? Don't underestimate bush, his advisors are a lot more intelligent than he may appear... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHobGoblin Posted July 24, 2004 Share Posted July 24, 2004 The phrase "Bush is an idiot" is no where near an arguement. Please raise the intelligence in your arguement above Whoopi Goldberg's level . Also He didn't cause any damage. Insane Terrorist did, and I'm not talking about physical damage. It set the economy out of whack. It's been having trouble recovering. But something I notice is how Kerry conviently supports the war when it helps him get votes, but later goes against it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C'jais Posted July 25, 2004 Share Posted July 25, 2004 I'm gonna close this puppy before it turns into yet another train wreck. Use the other existing "Bush vs Kerry" threads for slamming him. And do try to use more sound arguments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.